Performance of Bt. (Bacillus thuringiensis) cotton–A real time crop evapotranspiration based fertigation approach

Authors

  • JITENDER KUMAR Assistant Scientist, CCS HAU, Regional Research Station, Bawal (Rewari), Haryana 123 501
  • DHARAM BIR YADAV Principal Scientist (Agronomy) and Regional Director; CCS HAU, Regional Research Station, Bawal (Rewari), Haryana 123 501
  • PARMOD KUMAR YADAV Principal Scientist (Agronomy) and Regional Director; CCS HAU, Regional Research Station, Bawal (Rewari), Haryana 123 501
  • AMARJEET NIBHORIA Senior Scientist, CCS HAU, Regional Research Station, Bawal (Rewari), Haryana 123 501
  • SATYAJEET Senior Scientist (Agronomy); CCS HAU, Regional Research Station, Bawal (Rewari), Haryana 123 501

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v70.i3.5624

Keywords:

Cotton, Drip fertigation, Evapotranspiration, Productivity, Profitability, Water use efficiency

Abstract

Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) cotton hybrid was used as test material to conduct an experiment during kharif 2020 and 2021 in split plot design with three replications to evaluate the fertigation levels. Four irrigation levels, viz. drip irrigation at 1.0, 0.8 and 0.6 Crop Evapotranspiration (ETc), and Conventional Method (CM) of irrigation as main plot while, sub-plot treatments consisted four nutrient levels, viz. Recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) 175:60:60 (N:P:K), 75% of RDF, 50% of RDF and Control. Significantly higher seed cotton yield was recorded under drip irrigation at 1.0 ETc (2.42 and 1.42 t/ha) and 0.8 ETc (2.38 and 1.40 t/ha) over conventional method (CM) of irrigation (2.23 and 1.27 t/ha) during 2020 and 2021, respectively. The highest bolls per plant (36.5) were produced under drip irrigation at 1.0 ETc which were statistically similar to drip irrigation at 0.8 ETc and CM; which were significantly higher than at 0.6 ETc during 2020. Seed cotton yield produced at RDF (2.60 and 1.62 t/ha) and 75 % of RDF (2.53 and 1.59 t/ha) were statistically similar but significantly higher than 50% RDF (2.33 and 1.35 t/ ha) and control (1.72 and 0.72 t/ha) during 2020 and 2021. The total irrigation water use in Bt. cotton was reduced by 13.8-15.1 and 8.6-9.5 per cent while WUE increased by 24.7 and 18.6 percent under drip irrigation at 0.8 and 1.0 ETc, respectively, in comparison to CM. The highest net returns were recorded under nutrient levels @ 75% of RDF under drip irrigation at 1.0 ETc followed by 0.8 ETc.

References

Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D. and Smith, M. 1998. Crop Evapotranspiration, Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirement. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, Rome.

Anonymous, 2023. https://desagri.gov.in/document-report-category/agriculture-statistics-at-a-glance/

Bhaskar, K.S. 2004. Soil and water conservation under rainfed situation for sustainable cotton production. Recent Advances in Cotton Research and Development in India. Lead paper presented at the National Symposium on “Changing worldorder cotton research, development and policy in context” at Acharya N.G. Ranga. Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad. August 10-12, 2004. Proceeding, PP. 93–103.

Cetin, O. and Akalp, E. 2019. Efficient use of water and fertilizers in irrigated agriculture, drip irrigation and fertigation. Acta Horticulturaeet Regiotecturae 2: 97.

Cochran, W.G and Cox, G.M. 1959. Experimental Designs. John Wiley Pub., New York, USA.

COCPC. 2021. Area, production and yield of cotton. In meeting of Committee on Cotton Production and Consumption (COCPC) held on 22.03.2022 (2021). https://cotcorp.org.in/national_cotton.aspx

Flore, J.H.N., Faria, L.C., Neto, O.R., Diotto, A.V. and Colombo, A. 2021. Methodology for determining the emitter local head loss in drip irrigation systems.Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 147: 06020014. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001516

Fukai, S. and Mitchell, J. 2022. Factors determining water use efficiency in aerobic rice. Crop. Crop and Environment 1: 24–40. DOI:10.1016/j.crope.2022.03.008

Gawali, J., Dhamak, A. and Waikar, S. 2020. Effect of Water-Soluble fertilizers through fertigation on growth, yield component and yield of Bt cotton. International Journal of Chemical Studies 8(5): 2,635–2,638. DOI: 10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i5aj.10716

IWMI. 2006. Promoting micro-irrigation technologies that reduce poverty. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). (In) IWMI Water Policy Briefing 23,PP 6.

Magare, P.N., Katkar, R.N. and Jadhao, S.D. 2018. Effect of fertigation on yield, quality and soil fertility status under cotton grown in Vertisol. International Journal of Chemical Studies 6(2): 42–46.

Mussaddak, J. and George, S. 2001. Performance of cotton crop grown under surface irrigation and drip fertigation. I. Seed cotton yield, dry matter production, and lint properties. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 32: 3,045–3,061. DOI: 10.1081/CSS-120001106

Nalayini, P., Raj, S.P. and Sankarranarayanan, K. 2012. Drip fertigation of major, secondary and micronutrients for enhancing the productivity of extra long staple Bt. cotton. Journal of Cotton Research and Development 26(2): 186–189.

Pawar, N., Bishnoi, D., Singh, M. and Dhillon, A. 2015. Comparative economic analysis of drip irrigation vis-a-vis flood irrigation system on productivity of Bt. cotton in Haryana. Agricultural Science Digest - A Research Journal 35(4): 300–303. DOI: 35. 10.18805/asd.v35i4.6863.

Prajapati, G.V. and Subbaiah, R. 2018. Combined response of irrigation system regimes and mulching on productivity of Bt cotton. Journal of Agrometeorology 20: 47–51.

Sheoran, O.P., Tonk, D.S, Kaushik, L.S., Hasija, R.C. and Pannu, R.S. 1998. Statistical Software Package for Agricultural Research Workers. In Recent Advances in Information Theory, Statistics & Computer Applications (Hooda, DS, Hasija, RC, eds.). CCS HAU, Hisar, 1998, pp 139–143.

Singh, K., Rathore, P., Brar, A.S. and Mishra, S. K. 2021. Drip Fertigation Improves Seed Cotton Yield, Water Productivity and Profitability of Cotton Raised under High Density Planting System in Semi-Arid Environment. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture 33(9): 781–793 doi:10.9755/ejfa.2021.v33.i9.2751

Singh, K., Singh, P., Singh, M., Mishra, S.K., Iqbal, R., Al-Ashkar, I., Habib-ur-Rahman, M. and El Sabagh, A. 2022. Sub-surface drip fertigation improves seed cotton yield and monetary returns. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:1038163. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.1038163

Tandel, B.B., Usadadiya, U.P. Parmar, S.K. and Kaswala, A.R. 2022. Effect of fertigation on growth and yield of Bt. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) The Pharma Innovation Journal 11(12): 357–359.

Tian, D., Hou, C., Ren, J., Hao, L. and Li, Z. 2022. Effects of different irrigation methods and fertilizer amount on wheat yield and utilization of water, fertilizer and medicine. Water Saving Irrigation 10: 100–104, (In Chinese with English abstract).

Toonsiri, P., Del Grosso, S.J., Sukor, A. and Davis, J.G. 2016. Greenhouse gas emissions from solid and liquid organic fertilizers applied to lettuce. Journal of Environmental Quality 45: 1,812–1,821.

Uzen, N. and Cetin, O. 2016. Effects of nitrogen fertigation frequency on yield and nitrogen retention in drip-irrigated cotton. Journal of Plant Nutrition 39(14): 2,126.

Vaddula, Y. And Singh, K. 2023. Progression of drip irrigation and fertigation in cotton across the globe and its future perspectives for sustainable agriculture: an overview. Applied Water Science 13: 177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-023-01986-3

Yang, P., Wu, L., Cheng, M., Fan, J., Li, S., Wang, H. and Qian, L. 2023. Review on Drip Irrigation: Impact on Crop Yield, Quality, and Water Productivity in China. Water 15: 1,733.https://doi.org/10.3390/w15091733

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

JITENDER KUMAR, DHARAM BIR YADAV, PARMOD KUMAR YADAV, AMARJEET NIBHORIA, & SATYAJEET. (2025). Performance of Bt. (Bacillus thuringiensis) cotton–A real time crop evapotranspiration based fertigation approach. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 70(3), 325-331. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v70.i3.5624