Characterizing the diversity of tribal farming systems for preparing the apt interventions: A case study of the Western Himalayan Region

Authors

  • NISHA VERMA Scientist, ICAR-Indian Institute of Farming Systems Research, Modipuram, Meerut, 250 110
  • A K PRUSTY Principal Scientist, ICAR-Indian Institute of Farming Systems Research, Modipuram, Meerut, 250 110
  • CHANDRA BHANU Principal Scientist, ICAR-Indian Institute of Farming Systems Research, Modipuram, Meerut, 250 110
  • N RAVISANKAR Principal Scientist, ICAR-Indian Institute of Farming Systems Research, Modipuram, Meerut, 250 110
  • V P CHAUDHARY Principal Scientist, ICAR-Indian Institute of Farming Systems Research, Modipuram, Meerut, 250 110
  • ALKA VERMA Junior Research Officer, GBPUAT, Pantnagar,
  • DINESH KUMAR Junior Research Officer, GBPUAT, Pantnagar,
  • P C JAT Principal Scientist, ICAR-Indian Institute of Farming Systems Research, Modipuram, Meerut, 250 110
  • SUNIL KUMAR Director ICAR-Indian Institute of Farming Systems Research, Modipuram, Meerut, 250 110

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v70i.6281

Keywords:

Farm type, Heterogeneous, Sustainability, Tribal farming systems, Uttarakhand

Abstract

Smallholding farmers’ responses to integrated farming systems interventions were diverse due to their heterogeneous nature. To achieve the desired impact on productivity, profitability, and sustainability of tribal farming systems, there is an urgent need to understand the heterogeneity and classify them into homogenous groups. In the present study, the diversity of tribal farms was assessed using crop, livestock, and income-related characteristics. Using principal component analysis and cluster analysis for 100 farm households, 4 farm types were identified i.e. crop (rice-wheat) intensive farming system (26%), crop + dairy + off farm-based farming system (7%), resource- efficient, crop cum dairy based farming system (30%), off-farm dependent resource-poor farming system (35%). The findings of the study provide insights for planning appropriate integrated farming systems for nutrition security and sustainability.

References

Bingham, B.S.A., Gill, C., Welch, A., Day, K., Cassidy, A., Khaw, K.T., Sneyd, M.J., Key., T.J.A, Roe, L. and Day, N.E. 1994. Comparison of dietary assessment methods in nutritional epidemiology: weighed records v. 24 h recalls, food-frequency questionnaires and estimated-diet records ICMR Nutritive value of Indian foods, National Institute of Nutrition. Hyderabad: (2012). Indian Council of Medical Research. British Journal of Nutrition 72: 619–643.

Census 2011. Scheduled tribes in India. https://ruralindiaonline.org/en/library/resource/scheduled-tribes-in-india-as-revealed-incensus-2011/

Desai, L.J., Patel, K.M., Patel, P.K. and Patel, V.K. 2022. Productivity, profitability and soil sustainability of small-holding farming system through suitable cropping systems. Indian Journal of Agronomy 312–315. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v67i3.34

Eshetae, M. A., Abera, W., Tamene, L., Mulatu, K. and Tesfaye, A. 2024. Understanding farm typology for targeting agricultural development in mixed crop-livestock farming systems of Ethiopia. Farming System 2(3): 100088.

Goswami, R., Chatterjee, S. and Prasad, B. 2014. Farm types and their economic characterization in complex agro-ecosystems for informed extension intervention: study from coastal West Bengal, India. Agricultural and Food Economics 2: 1–24.

Innazent, A., Jacob, D., Bindhu, J. S., Joseph, B., Anith, K. N., Ravisankar, N., Prusty A. K., Paramesh V. and Panwar A. S.2022. Farm typology of smallholders integrated farming systems in Southern Coastal Plains of Kerala, India. Scientific Reports 12(1): 333.

Kaur, J., Prusty, A. K., Ravisankar, N., Panwar, A. S., Shamim, M., Walia, S. S., Chatterjee, S., Pasha, M. L., Babu Subhash, Jat M. L., López-Ridaura, S., Groot, J.C. J., Toorop, R.A., Barba-Escoto L, Noopur K and Kashyap P. 2021. Farm typology for planning targeted farming systems interventions for smallholders in Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. Scientific reports 11(1): 20,978.

Kumar, S., Bhatt, B.P., Dey, A., Shivani, S., Kumar, U., Idris, M.D. et al 2018. Integrated farming system in India: Current status, scope and future prospects in changing agricultural scenario. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 88(11): 1,661–1,675.

Kumar, S., Craufurd, P., Haileslassie, A., Ramilan, T., Rathore, A., and Whitbread, A. 2019. Farm typology analysis and technology assessment: An application in an arid region of South Asia. Land use policy 88: 104,149.

Raghav, S., and Srivastava, S.K. 2014. Socio-economic status of tribal farm households under different farming systems in the plain region of Uttarakhand, India. International Journal of Basic and Applied Agricultural Research 12(2): 160–166.

Sinha, A., Basu, D., Priyadarshi, P., Ghosh, A., and Sohane, R. K. 2022. Farm typology for targeting extension interventions among smallholders in tribal villages in Jharkhand state of India. Frontiers in Environmental Science 10: 823,338.

Thompson, F.E. and Subar, A.F. 2017 Dietary assessment methodology. Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease. 5–48. doi:: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802928-2.00001-1.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-11

How to Cite

NISHA VERMA, A K PRUSTY, CHANDRA BHANU, N RAVISANKAR, V P CHAUDHARY, ALKA VERMA, DINESH KUMAR, P C JAT, & SUNIL KUMAR. (2025). Characterizing the diversity of tribal farming systems for preparing the apt interventions: A case study of the Western Himalayan Region. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 70, 62-67. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v70i.6281