Effect of herbicide and varying rates of straw mulching on weed dynamics, productivity and profitability of rice

Authors

  • SUBHAPRADA DASH Associate Professor, Department of Agronomy, M.S. Swaminathan School of Agriculture, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Parlakhemundi, Odisha 761 211
  • ANKITA PRIYADARSHINI Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan, Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751 030
  • JAGADISH JENA Assistant Professor,Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan, Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751 030
  • STUTI DEBAPRIYA BEHERA Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan, Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751 030
  • TANMOY SHANKAR Department of Agronomy, M.S. Swaminathan School of Agriculture, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Parlakhemundi, Odisha 761 211
  • JNANA BHARATI PALAI Department of Agronomy, M.S. Swaminathan School of Agriculture, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Parlakhemundi, Odisha 761 211
  • BASUDEV BEHERA Department of Agronomy, M.S. Swaminathan School of Agriculture, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Parlakhemundi, Odisha 761 211

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v69i4.5537

Keywords:

Direct-seeded rice, Integrated weed management, Mulching, Rice straw, Weed

Abstract

In kharif 2022 and 2023 a field study was conducted in randomized complete block design with three replications for evaluating eleven treatments comprised of sole application of pendimethalin (750 g/ha) and bispyribac- Na (25 g/ha), rice straw mulch (RSM) (4, 6 and 8 t/ha), combination of pendimethalin along with variable rates of RSM, sequential application of pendimethalin fb bispyribac-Na and compared with weed free and weedy check. The study revealed that among the herbicidal and straw mulching treatments, the application of pendimethalin fb RSM 8 t/ha registered significantly the minimum density and biomass of total and all categories of weeds, except broad leaved weeds (BLWs) at 45 DAS. However, it was followed by the application of pendimethalin fb RSW 6 t/ha and pendimethalin fb bispyribac-Na application. The weed-free treatment registered the maximum weed control efficiency (WCE) and the minimum density and biomass of broad-leaved weeds, which was at par with pendimethalin fb bispyribac-Na treatment. Weed-free plot produced the maximum grain yield of 3.98 t/ha, which was at par with the application of pendimethalin fb straw mulching at 8t/ha (3.86 t/ha), pendimethalin fb bispyribac-Na (3.77 t/ha) and pendimethalin fb straw mulching at 6 t/ha (3.74 t/ha) treatments. Further, economic analysis revealed that the sequential application pendimethalin 750 g/ha (Pre) fb bispyribac-Na 25 g/ha (Post) fetch maximum net return (Rs.45,282/ha), which was followed by the integration of pendimethalin 750 g/ha fb RSM 6 t/ha (Rs.31,056/ha) in DSR. These treatments could manage the diverse weed flora and obtain higher grain yield and more significant profit in direct-seeded rice.

References

Chakraborti, M., Duary, B. and Datta, M. 2017. Integrated weed management in direct-seeded upland rice under Tripura condition, Indian Journal Weed Science 49(2): 123–127.

Chowdhury, R., Dash, S. and Pradhan, A. 2021. Weed Management in Direct Seeded Rice-Mustard-Sesame Crop Sequence in Lateritic Soil of Birbhum, West Bengal. Pesticide Research Journal 33(2): 43–51.

Dash, S., Duary, B. and Sar, K. 2021. Efficacy of fenoxaprop-pethyl and penoxsulam for weed management with special emphasis on Echinochloa spp. in transplanted summer rice. Indian Journal Weed Science 53(1): 78–80.

Dash, S., Malik, G.C., Banerjee, M. and Sethi, D. 2016a. Effect of different weed management practices in Boro rice cultivation. Advance of Life Science 5(4): 1,351–1,355.

Dash, S., Malik, G.C., Banerjee, M. and Sethi, D. 2016b. Weed management in summer rice and their residual effect on black gram. International Journal of Farm Sciences 6(2): 19–23.

Kumar, V., Mahajan, G., Sheng, Q. and Chauhan, B.S. 2023. Weed management in wet direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.): Issues and opportunities. Advances in Agronomy 179: 91–133.

Nath, S., Dhyani, V.C., Singh, V.P., Chaturvedi, S., Praharaj, S. and Sarvadamana, A.K. 2020. Biochar and herbicide application affect weed dynamics and yield of dry direct-seeded rice. Indian Journal Weed Science 52(3): 280–282.

Sangramsingh, P.K. and Dash, S. 2021. Sole and sequential application of herbicide and straw mulch on weed growth and productivity of direct seeded rainfed rice

(Oryza sativa L.). Bangladesh Journal of Botany 50(3): 671–677.

Sangramsingh, P.K., Dash, S., Chowdhury, M.R., Nanda, S.S., Sar, K., Behera, B. and Gulati, J.M.L. 2022. Effect of integrated application of herbicides and straw mulch on productivity and profitability of rainfed upland rice (Oryza sativa). Indian Journal of Agronomy 67(3): 316–319.

Saravanane P. 2020. Effect of different weed management options on weed flora, rice grain yield and economics in dry direct-seeded rice, Indian Journal Weed Science 52(2):

–106.

Singh, M.K. and Saini S.S. 2008. Planting date, mulch, and herbicide rate effects on the growth, yield, and physicochemical properties of menthol mint (Mentha arvensis L.). Weed Technology 22(4): 691698.

Singh, M.K., Mishra, A., Khanal, N. and Prasad, S.K. 2019. Effects of sowing dates and mulching on growth and yield of wheat and weeds (Phalaris minor Retz.). Bangladesh Journal of Botany 48(1): 1 9.

Teja, K.C., Duary, B. and Dash, S. 2017. Efficacy of herbicides and their combination on weed management in transplanted kharif rice. Journal of Crop and Weed 13(2): 175–179.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-28

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

SUBHAPRADA DASH, ANKITA PRIYADARSHINI, JAGADISH JENA, STUTI DEBAPRIYA BEHERA, TANMOY SHANKAR, JNANA BHARATI PALAI, & BASUDEV BEHERA. (2024). Effect of herbicide and varying rates of straw mulching on weed dynamics, productivity and profitability of rice. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 69(4), 364-368. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v69i4.5537