70(1) Special Issue of IJA Optimizing agronomic practices for enhancing yield, quality and energy efficiency in perennial forage moringa (Moringa oleifera) production

Authors

  • Mohd Arif Scientist, ICAR-IIFSR, Modipuram -250110
  • RAVINDRA KUMAR
  • ARVIND KUMAR2
  • B. RAI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v70i.6007

Keywords:

Crude protein yield, Cutting height, Energy intensity, Energy productivity, Perennial moringa.

Abstract

Experiments were conducted at ICAR-CIRG, Makhdoom from 2021 to 2023 to optimize agronomic practices for cultivating Moringa oleifera as a perennial forage crop. The study focused on evaluating the effects of three crop geometries (30 cm × 15 cm, 45 cm × 15 cm, and 60 cm × 15 cm) and four cutting heights (15, 30, 45, and 60 cm) on dry fodder yield, fodder quality and energy use efficiency. The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design with three replications. Results showed that among the crop geometries, the 30 cm × 15 cm spacing produced the highest dry fodder yield (44.75 t ha⁻¹), total crude protein yield (8356 kg ha⁻¹), net energy returns (605146 MJ ha⁻¹), energy productivity (0.79 kg MJ⁻¹) and energy profitability (10.66). Among the cutting heights, harvesting at 30 cm from ground level resulted in the highest dry fodder yield (43.01 t ha⁻¹), total crude protein yield (7567 kg ha⁻¹), net energy returns (579828 MJ ha⁻¹), energy productivity (0.76 kg MJ⁻¹) and energy profitability (10.28). However, the values for 30 cm and 45 cm cutting heights were statistically comparable across these parameters. This suggests that both cutting heights are equally effective for optimizing yield and energy efficiency in moringa forage production.

References

Adegun, M. K. and Ayodele, O. J. 2015. Growth and yield of Moringa oleifera as influenced by spacing and organic manures in South-Western Nigeria. International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research 6(6): 30-37.

Chen, Y., Zheng, H., Wang, W. and Tang, Q. 2023. Cutting time and height improve carbon and energy use efficiency of the forage–food dual-purpose ratoon rice cropping. Heliyon 9: e14042.

Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F. N. and Leip, A. 2021. Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Nature Food 2: 198-209.

Erdal, G., Esengun, K., Erdal, H. and Gunduz, O. 2007. Energy use and economical analysis of sugar beet production in Tokat province of Turkey. Energy 32: 35-41.

Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. International Rice Research Institute, John Wiley and Sons. New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore.

Lorzadeh, S. H., Mahdavidamghani, A. and Mohammad Yousefi, M. R. 2011. Energy input-output analysis for maize production systems in Shooshtar, Iran. Advances in Environmental Biology 5(11): 3641-3644.

Mabapa, M. P., Ayisi, K. K. and Mariga, I. K. 2017. Effect of planting density and harvest interval on the leaf yield and quality of moringa (Moringa oleifera) under diverse agroecological conditions of Northern South Africa. International Journal of Agronomy 17: 1-9.

Mangal, M. Q., Hemat, M., Hamayoun, L. H. H., Ghafari, S. R. and Jalali, M. N. 2017. Response of maize varieties under variable planting geometry in Kandahar semi-arid situation. International Journal of Applied Research 3(10): 74-78.

Manoj, K. N., Shekara, B. G., Sridhara, S., Mudalagiriyappa, Chikkarugi, N. M., Gopakkali, P., Jha, P. K. and Vara Prasad, P. V. 2022. Carbon footprint assessment and energy budgeting of different annual and perennial forage cropping systems: A study from the semi-arid region of Karnataka, India. Agronomy 12: 1783.

Meena, O. P., Sammauria, R., Gupta, A. K. and Gupta, K. C. 2022. Energy-carbon footprint vis-à-vis system productivity and profitability of diversified crop rotations in semi-arid plains of North-West India. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 22: 2026-2041.

Priya, R. R., Krishnan, R., Srinivasan, K. and Shanmugasundaram, S. 2019. Energy production, consumption and yield of maize under different planting density and fertilizer levels. Environment and Ecology 37(3A): 881-885.

Rosa, L., Rulli, M. C., Ali, S., Chiarelli, D. D., Dell’Angelo, J., Mueller, N. D., Scheidel, A., Siciliano, G. and D’Odorico, P. 2021. Energy implications of the 21st century agrarian transition. Nature Communications 12: 2319.

Sidhdharth, G., Nageswari, K., Balakumbahan, R., Kavitha, M. P. and Uma Maheswari, M. 2022. Interventions of plant geometry and harvesting heights on growth and leaf yield parameters in moringa (Moringa oleifera Lam.). Journal of Current Crop Science and Technology 109 (Special): 155-159.

Tuti, M. D., Prakash, V., Pandey, B. M., Bhattacharya, R., Mahanta, D., Bisht, J. K., Mina, M. K., Mina, B. L., Kumar, N., Bhatt, J. C. and Srivastva, A. K. 2012. Energy budgeting of colocasia-based cropping systems in the Indian sub-Himalayas. Energy 45: 986-993.

Velayudham, K., Babu, C., Iyanar, K. and Kalamai, A. 2011. Impact of plant geometry and fertilizer levels on Bajra Napier hybrid grass. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 81(6): 575-577.

Yadav, M. R., Kumar, S., Behera, B., Yadav, V. P., Khrub, A. S., Yadav, L. R., Gupta, K. C., Meena, O. P., Baloda, A. S. and Raza, M. B. 2023. Energy-carbon footprint, productivity and profitability of barley cultivars under contrasting tillage-residue managements in semi-arid plains of North-West India. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 23: 1109-1124.

Zheng, Y., Zhang, Y. and Wu, J. 2016. Yield and quality of Moringa oleifera under different planting densities and cutting heights in southwest China. Industrial Crops and Products 91: 88-96.

Published

2026-04-13

How to Cite

Mohd Arif, RAVINDRA KUMAR, ARVIND KUMAR2, & B. RAI. (2026). 70(1) Special Issue of IJA Optimizing agronomic practices for enhancing yield, quality and energy efficiency in perennial forage moringa (Moringa oleifera) production. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 70. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v70i.6007