Poplar based agroforestry system: Symmetry to maximize productivity and optimized nutrient acquisition in fodder sorghum–wheat rotation in semiarid region of Haryana

Authors

  • Mohammad Hasanain ICAR-IARI, RS, Pusa, Samastipur (Bihar)
  • Shabnam CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar
  • K.K Bhardwaj CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar
  • Amit Kumar ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Sikkim Centre, Tadong Sikkim
  • Priyanka Sanwal CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v69i3.5525

Keywords:

Nutrient content, Nutrient uptake, poplar spacing, Yield

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the kharif and rabi season of 2 years (2022–24) at the farm of agroforestry of Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar to evaluate the impact of different geometry of poplar on the yield and nutrient uptake of sorghum and wheat under poplar-based agroforestry sys- tems. The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with 3 replications. The sorghum and wheat were sown as per the treatment comprising different spacing of poplar i.e. 3 m × 3 m, 4 m × 3 m, 5 m × 3 m, 6 m × 3 m, 7 m × 3 m, 8 m × 3 m and control (sole crops without trees). The results showed that sorghum (14.02 and 14.48 t/ ha) dry fodder yield and wheat grain yield (5.14 and 5.30 t/ha) and straw yield (7.17 and 7.28 t/ha) were maximum under control in 2022–23 and 2023–24, respectively. The yield of sorghum (13.62 and 15.54%), wheat grain (44.55 and 45.66%) and wheat straw (39.05 and 39.15%) were lower at 3 m × 3 m spacing compared to control in 2022–23 and 2023–24, respectively. The increase in spacing of poplar increase the yield of sorghum and wheat during both the years of study i.e. least yields at 3 m × 3 m popular spacing and highest under 8 m × 3 m spacing. However, popular based system yields of sorghum (8.01 and 8.42%), wheat grain (50.18 and 50.00%) and wheat straw (42.56 and 42.44%) were higher under 8 m × 3 m than 3 m × 3 m spacing in 2022–23 and 2023–24, respec- tively. Similar significant results were obtained in case of nutrient uptake N, P and K as yield of sorghum (143.9, 147.2, 18.3, 19.9 and 31.4, 29.2 kg/ha) and wheat in grain (81.8, 83.4, 13.7, 14.3 and 13.3 14.4 kg/ha) and straw (26.8, 28.4, 7.5, 8.7 and 64.2, 66.3 kg/ha) under 8 m × 3 m during 2022–23 and 2023–24, respectively. Hence, control has significant effect on the yield and nutrient uptake of crops than under agroforestry systems. While, among all the treatments of poplar-based alley crop systems, spacing of 8 × 3 m the significantly higher green for- age, and grain yields and nutrient uptake.

References

Chaturvedi, O.P., Sikka, A.K., Handa, A.K. and Bajpai, C.K. (2016) Agroforestry Technologies for Different Agro-climatic zones of the Country. All India Coordinated Research project on Agroforestry, ICAR-Central Agroforestry Research Institute, Jhansi (UP).

Chauhan, S.K., Nanda, R.K. and Brar, M.S. 2009. Adoption of poplar-based agroforestry as an approach for diversified agriculture in Punjab. Indian Forester, 135(5), 671.

Christensen, B.T. 2001. Physical fractionation of soil and structural and functional complexity in organic matter turnover. European Journal of Soil Science, 52(3):345–353.

Devi, S., Bhardwaj, K.K., Dahiya, G. and Sharma, M.K. 2020. Assessment of yield and nutrient uptake of wheat in agri-silvi-horticulture system under semi-arid region of Haryana. Indian Journal of Ecology, 47(3), 866-868.

Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd edn, p 680. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

Gupta, G.S. 2019. Land degradation and challenges of food security. Review of European Studies, 11, 63.

Gurmessa, B., Ashworth, A.J., Yang, Y., Adhikari, K., Savin, M., Owens, P. and Corti, G. 2021. Soil bacterial diversity based on management and topography in a silvopastoral system. Applied Soil Ecology, 163, 103918.

Handa, A.K., Dev, I., Rizvi, R.H., Naresh, K., Ram, A., Dheeraj, K., Anil, K., Bhaskar, S., Dhyani, S.K., and Javed, R. 2019. Successful Agroforestry Models for Different Agro-Ecological Regions in India. Published by ICAR- Central Agroforestry Research Institute, Jhansi and World Agroforestry Centre.

Jackson, M.L. 1973. Soil chemical analysis. Printice hall of India Limited, New Delhi, p 372.

Jose, S. 2009. Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview (pp. 1-10). Springer, Dordrecht.

Kumar, S., Agrawal, R.K., Dixit, A.K., Rai, Arvind, K., Singh, J.B. and Rai, S.K. 2012a. Forage Production Technology for Arable Lands. Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi. Pp 62.

Kumar, S., Agrawal, R.K., Dixit, A.K., Rai, Arvind, K., Singh, J.B. and Rai, S.K. 2012b. Forage Production Technology for Arable Lands. Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi. Pp 62

Lamerre, J., Schwarz, K.U., Langhof, M., von Wühlisch, G. and Greef, J.M. 2015. Productivity of poplar short rotation coppice in an alley-cropping agroforestry system. Agroforestry Systems, 89(5): 933-942.

Lindsay, W.L. and Norvell, W. 1978. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil science society of America journal, 42(3), 421-428.

Mallikarjun, R.H., Kumar, R., Meena, R.K. and Ginwal, D. 2018. Yield and chemical composition of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) fodder as affected by tillage practices and nitrogen management. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition, 35(3): 333–338.

Prasad, R., Shivay, Y.S., Kumar, D. and Sharma, S.N. 2006. Learning by doing exercise in soil fertility (A practical manual for soil fertility), Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, pp. 68

Qiao, X., Sai, L., Chen, X., Xue, L. and Lei, J. 2019. Impact of fruit-tree shade intensity on the growth, yield, and quality of intercropped wheat. PLoS One, 14(4), e0203238.

Rana, K.S., Choudhary, A.K., Sepat, S., Bana, R.S. and Dass, A. (2014). Methodological and analytical agronomy: Post Graduate School. IARI, New Delhi, p 276

Rizvi, R.H., Handa, A.K., Sridhar, K.B., Singh, R.K., Dhyani, S.K., Rizvi, J. and Dongre, G. 2020. Spatial analysis of area and carbon stocks under Populus deltoides based agroforestry systems in Punjab and Haryana states of Indo-Gangetic Plains. Agroforestry Systems, 94(6), 2185-2197.

Sharma, N.K., Singh, R.J. and Kumar, K. 2012. Dry matter accumulation and nutrient uptake by wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under poplar (Populus deltoides) based agroforestry system. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2012(1), 359673.

Sirohi, C. and Bangarwa, K.S. 2017. Effect of different spacings of poplar-based agroforestry system on soil chemical properties and nutrient status in Haryana, India. Current Science, 1403-1407.

Sirohi, C., Dhillon, R.S., Handa, A.K., Kumar, P., Bhardwaj, K.K., Kumari, S. and Chavan, S.B. 2020. Promising wheat cultivars for poplar (Populus deltoides) based agroforestry system in semi-arid ecosystem of Northern India. Indian Journal of Agroforestry, 22(1), 31-37.

Yadav, R. S., Yadav, B. L., Chhipa, B. R. and Keshwa, G. L. 2005. Nutrient removal and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum Linn.) as influenced by different tree species in agroforestry under semi-arid condition of Rajasthan. Indian Journal of Agroforestry, 7(1).

Downloads

Published

2024-10-02

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

Hasanain, M., Shabnam, K.K Bhardwaj, Amit Kumar, & Priyanka Sanwal. (2024). Poplar based agroforestry system: Symmetry to maximize productivity and optimized nutrient acquisition in fodder sorghum–wheat rotation in semiarid region of Haryana. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 69(3). https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v69i3.5525