Effect of weed management on sisal (Agave sisalana) nursery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v59i3.5629Keywords:
Crop protection, Chemical and ecological weed management, Nursery, Sisal, Soil microbesAbstract
A field experiment was conducted during June–December of 2009 and 2010 at Bamra, Sambalpur, Odisha, to study the effects of weed-management methods on the weeds of sisal (Agave sisalana Perrine ex Engelm.) nursery and their effect on the growth of sisal plants in nursery and also on soil microbes. The dominant grass weeds were Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers., Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn., Dactyloctenium aegyptium (L.) P. Beauv., and Digitaria sangunalis (L.) Scop. The important broad-leaf weeds were Solanum nigrum L., Amaranthus spinosus L., Physalis minima L. and Phyllanthus niruri L. The only sedge weed was Cyperus rotundus L. in the experimental plots. At 15 days after planting (DAP), the highest weed-control efficiency (WCE) of 89.2% was recorded with smetolachlor and at 30 DAP, the highest WCE was obtained from manual weeding (90–93%), followed by smetolachlor (87.1%). However, at 45 DAP and beyond only 2 manual weeding showed the highest WEC of 92.3 (45 DAP) and 71.8% (60 DAP). Hand-weeding twice produced the most robust type of sisal plantlets (13.9 g/plant), followed by sisal waste (13.3 g/plant). All the tested herbicides reduced the biomass production by sisal bulbils as compared to hand weeding in the order of trifluralin (14.7%) > pretilachlor (22.1%) > s-metolachlor (35.9%) > quizalofop ethyl (39.2%). At the maturity stage of sisal bulbils in the primary nursery, there was little effect of trifluralin and quizalofop ethyl on the total bacteria count. In contrast, the total bacteria population remained depressed in pretilachlor (41.7%) and s-metolachor (42.1%)-treated plots. The total actinomycetes population could not reach to the normal level (57.79 × 104 CFU/g) in case of s-metolachlor (–50.2%), pretilachlor (–46.1%) and quizalofop ethyl (–38.6%). At this stage, the total fungi population was more or less same in all the treatments except in quizalofop ethyl which increased the population by 2.5 folds.
References
Alemán Ruiz, P., and Flores Lópes, H.E. 2002. Períodos críticos de competencia entre Agave tequilero y maleza (Critical period of competition between weeds and Agave tequilana). In: Agro-ecological analysis of Agave tequilana with emphasis on phytosanitary problems, Special Publication No. 1, pp. 141–47. National Institute for Forestry, Agriculture and Livestock, Regional Research Centre of the Pacific, Jalisco, Mexico.
Bickerton, D.C. 2006. Using herbicide to control century plant (Agave americana): implications for management. In: Proceedings of 15th Australian Weed Conference, held during 24–28 September 2006 at Adelaide, South Australia, pp. 219–22.
Majumdar, B., Sarkar, S., Saha, A.R., Maitra, D.N., and Maji, B. 2008. Effect of herbicides and fungicides applied to jute (Corchorus olitorius L.) on fibre yield and nutrient uptake by jute and changes in microbial dynamics of soil. Environment and Ecology 26(4): 1613–18.
Martin, J.P. 1950. Use of acid, rose Bengal and streptomycin in the plate method for estimating soil fungi. Soil Science 69: 215–32.
Pramer, D., and Schmidt, E.L. 1966. Experimental Soil Microbiology. 106 pp. Burges Publication Co., Minneapolis, MN., USA.
Salgado, A.L.B., Deuber, R., and Forster, R. 1980. Herbicidas no transplante de mudas de sisal (Agave sisalana Perr.). Bragantia 39(1): 7–14.
Sarkar, S., and Abdullah, S.K. 2010. Weed management in primary nursery of sisal. Jaf News 8(2): 22.
Sarkar, S., Bhattacharjee, A.K., and Mitra, S. 2005. Weed management in jute by trifluralin (48% EC) in the early jute-weed competition phase. Journal of Crop and Weed 2(1): 30–33.
Sarkar, S., Kar, C.S., Sinha, M.K., and Mahapatra, B.S. 2010. Improved production technology of sisal. Indian Farming 59(12): 17–21.
Thornton, H.G. 1922. On the development of a standardized agar medium for counting soil bacteria with special regards to the repression of spreading of colonies. Annals of Applied Biology 2: 241–74.
