Influence of mulching on productivity, root growth and weed dynamics of maize (Zea mays)–based cropping systems

Authors

  • V.K. CHOUDHARY National Institute of Biotic Stress Management, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 493 225
  • P. SURESH KUMAR National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management, Baramati, Pune, Maharashtra 413 115

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v59i3.5609

Keywords:

Crop production, Cropping systems, Maize, Mulch, Root characteristics, Soil moisture, Weed dynamics

Abstract

An experiment was conducted at Basar, during 2008–11 on maize (Zea mays L.)–based cropping systems, to evaluate the production, root growth and weed dynamics with and without mulch. The productivity of sequential crops was 18–35% higher with mulch application than no mulch. However, the highest maize yield (4.25 t/ha) was obtained with maize–groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cropping system, followed by maize–pea (Pisum sativum L.; 4.24 t/ha). Similarly, yield of sequence crop was the highest with Frenchbean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.; 4.91 t/ha). Maize–equivalent yield and production efficiency were the highest with maize–Frenchbean system (10.1 t/ha and 42.4 kg/ha/day respectively). Land-use efficiency was found maximum with maize–Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. & Cosson] system (71.9%) followed by maize–groundnut system. Root length, dry weight, volume number and density were recorded higher with groundnut (50.2 cm, 6.9 g/plant, 43.3 cc, 20.8 and 160.5 mg/ cc respectively) followed by Indian mustard and lowest with Frenchbean. However, specific root length was highest with pea (12.0 cc/g). Density, dry weight, index and persistency of weed were the highest with maize–fallow, followed by maize–Frenchbean system. However, weed-smothering efficiency was the maximum with maize–groundnut (59.4 %), followed by maize–Indian mustard system (58.6%). Mulched plot registered the least said weed parameters with 65% weed-smothering efficiency. Soil-moisture content 30, 60 and 90 days after sowing (DAS) was higher with maize–groundnut system, followed by maize–Indian mustard system, and between the mulch, no mulched plot had considerably lower soil moisture than the mulched ones.

References

Angas, P., Lampurlanes, J. and Cantero-Martinez, C. 2006. Tillage and N fertilization effect on N dynamics and barley yield under semiarid Mediterranean conditions. Soil and Tillage Research 87: 59–71.

Arif, M., Khan, M.A., Akbar, H., Sajjad and Ali, S. 2006. Prospects of wheat as a dual-purpose crop and its impact on weeds. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research 12(1–2): 13–17.

Azam, M.G., Zoebisch, M.A. and Wickramarachchi, K.S. 2008. Effect of cropping system on selected soil structural properties and crop yields in the Lam Phra Phloeng watershed-Northeast Thailand. Agronomy Journal 7(1): 56–62.

Benjamin, J.G. and Nielsen, D.C. 2006. Water deficit effects on root distribution of soybean, field pea, and chickpea. Field Crops Research 97: 248–53.

Bu, Y.S., Shao, H.L. and Wang, J.C. 2002. Effects of different mulch materials on corn seeding growth and soil nutrients' contents and distributions. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 16(3): 40–42.

Cantero-Martinez, C., Angas, P. and Lampurlanes, J. 2003. Growth, yield, and water productivity of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) affected by tillage and N fertilization in Mediterranean semiarid, rainfed conditions of Spain. Field Crops Research 84: 341–57.

Choudhary, V.K., Kumar, P.S., Sarkar, S.K. and Yadav, J.S. 2013. Production potential, economic analysis and energy auditing for maize (Zea mays)-vegetable-based cropping systems in Eastern Himalayan Region, Arunachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 83(1): 110–15.

Gan, Y., Campbell, C.A., Liu, L., Basnyat, P. and McDonald, C.L., 2009. Water use and distribution profile under pulse and oilseed crops in semiarid northern high latitude area. Agricultural Water Management 96: 337–48.

Ghosh, P.K., Dayal, D., Bandyopadhyay, K.K. and Mohanty, M. 2006. Evaluation of straw and polythene mulch for enhancing productivity of irrigated summer groundnut. Field Crops Research 99: 76–86.

Hiltbrunner, J., Jeanneret, P., Liedgens, M., Stamp, P. and Streit, B. 2007. Response of weed communities to legume living mulches in winter wheat. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 193: 93–102.

Kaneko, S., Tanaka, K., Toyota, T. and Managi, S. 2004. Water use efficiency of agricultural production in China: Regional comparison from 1999 to 2002. Agriculture Journal of Science, China 72: 95–104.

Khan, I., Hassan, G., Khan, M.I. and Khan, I.A. 2004. Efficacy of some new herbicidal molecules on grassy and broadleaf weeds in wheat. II. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research 10(1–2): 33–38.

Korir, N.K., Aguyoh, J.N. and Gaoqiong, L. 2006. Enhanced growth and yield of greenhouse-produced cucumber under high altitude areas of Kenya. Agricultura Tropica et Subtropica 39(4): 249–54.

Merrill, S.D., Tanaka, D.L. and Hanson, J.D. 2002. Root length growth of eight crop species in Haplustoll soils. Soil Science Society of American Journal 66: 913–23.

Moonen, A.C. and Barberi, P. 2004. Size and composition of the weed seed bank after 7 years of different cover-crop–maize management systems. Weed Research 44: 163–77.

Mukherjee, Dhiman. 2010. Productivity profitability and apparent nutrient balance under different crop sequences in mid-hill conditions. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 80(5): 420–22.

Patel, D.B., Patel, R.H. and Patel, R.B. 2009. Effect of drip irrigation, mulches and nitrogen fertigation on yield and yield attributes of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 79(1): 12–15.

Saha, R. and Ghosh, P.K. 2010. Effect of land configuration on water economy, crop yield and profitability under rice (Oryza sativa)-based cropping system in northeast India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 80(1): 16–20.

Sarkar, S. and Goswami, S.B. 2007. Soil temperature, water use efficiency and yield of yellow sarson (Brassica napus L.) in relation to tillage intensity and mulch management under rainfed lowland ecosystem in eastern India. Soil and Tillage Research 46: 153–63.

Kumar, P.S., Choudhary, V.K., and Bhagawati, R. 2012. Influence of mulching and irrigation level on water-use efficiency, plant growth, and quality of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 82(2): 127–33.

Tomar, S.S. and Tiwari, A.S. 1990. Production potential and economics of different cropping sequences. Indian Journal of Agronomy 35(1–2): 30–35.

Yang, Y., Liu, X., Li, W. and Li, C. 2006. Effect of different mulch materials on winter wheat production in desalinized soil in Heilonggang region of North China. Journal of Zhejiang University Sciences B. 7(11): 858–67.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-30

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

V.K. CHOUDHARY, & P. SURESH KUMAR. (2024). Influence of mulching on productivity, root growth and weed dynamics of maize (Zea mays)–based cropping systems. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 59(3), 364-370. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v59i3.5609