Effect of tillage and precision nutrient placement on growth and productivity of maize (Zea mays L.)

Authors

  • Teekam Singh ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute
  • Prakash Sonnad Division of Agronomy, ICAR-IARI, New Delhi 110012
  • Sanket G.D. Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012
  • Tanmay Das Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012
  • Dr. Ramanjit Kaur Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012
  • Dr. Raj Singh Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v69i2.5477

Abstract

In the rainy season of 2022–23 at ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, a field study was explored on the effect of tillage and precise nutrient placement on maize (Zea mays L.) growth. Employing a split-plot design with 3-tillage methods in main plots viz.,  T1 (conventional tillage); T2 (once rotavator as minimum tillage) and T3 (zero tillage) and 4- precision nutrient application options N1 50% RDF as point placement; N2 75% RDF as band placement; N3 100% RDF as band placement and N4 100% RDF as broadcasting were tested in subplots. Results indicated that tillage and precision nutrient placement practices improved the  plant height and LAI of maize. Minimum tillage recorded significantly higher crop growth indices, viz., CGR (1.92 g/m2/day), RGR (26.80g/g/day) and dry matter accumulation (204.58g/plant) over other tillage practices at 60 to 90 Days after sowing (DAS). Root attributes also improved under minimum tillage. The grain yield was significantly higher with minimum tillage (6.22 t/ha) over other tillage practices. Among the precision nutrient application options, 100% RDF as band placement recorded significantly higher grain yield (6.20 t/ha) over N2 and N4 but remained statistically at par with 50% RDF point placement (6.06 t/ha). The findings suggested that adopting minimum tillage and precise nutrient point placement could significantly enhance maize growth and yield in kharif seasons, offering 50% reduction in fertilizer consumption.

References

Asija, G.L. and Subbiah, B.V. 1956. A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Current science 25: 259–260.

Bamboriya, S.D., Shivadhar, Upadhyay, P.K., Dass, A., Meena, R.P. and Garg, K. 2023. Evaluation of maize (Zea mays) genotypes under different nitrogen levels in a Trans-Gangetic Plains region. Indian Journal of Agronomy 68(4): 368-372

Chen, Z., Wang, H., Liu, X., Liu, Y., Gao, S. and Zhou, J. 2016. The effect of N fertilizer placement on the fate of urea-15N and yield of winter wheat in southeast China. PLoS One 11(4): 153701.

Choudhary, M., Rana, K. S., Meena, M. C., Bana, R. S., Jakhar, P., Ghasal, P. C. and Verma, R. K. 2019. Changes in physicochemical and biological properties of soil under conservation agriculture-based pearl millet–mustard cropping system in rainfed semi-arid region. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 65: 911–927.

Dass A, Suri V K and Choudhary A K. 2014. Site specific nutrient management approaches for enhanced nutrient-use efficiency in agricultural crops. Research Review Journal Crop Science Technology 3(3): 1–6.

Irizar, A., Andriulo, A. and Mary, B. 2013. Long-term impact of no tillage in two intensified crop rotations on different soil organic matter fractions in Argentine rolling Pampa. Open Agriculture Journal 7: 22-31.

Jackson, M.L. 1973. Soil Chemical Analysis (II Ed.). Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, pp. 498

Karami, A., Homaee, M. and Afzalina, S. H. S. 2012. Organic resource management impact of soil aggregate stability and soil physic-Chemi Properties. Agriculture Environment 148: 22-14.

Mashingaidze, A. B., Lotz, L. A., Van der Werf, W., Chipomho, J., Kropff, M. J., Nabwami, J. 2010. The influence of fertilizer placement on maize yield and growth of weeds. In Proceedings of the 2010 Jkuat Scientific Technological and Industrialization Conference, Nairobi, Kenya, 17–19 November 2010.

Nayaka G V, Reddy G P and Kumar R M. 2021. Dry matter production and partitioning in different plant parts of rice cultivars under irrigation regimes and systems of cultivation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research 55(3): 347–52.

Nayak, H. S., Parihar, C. M., Mandal, B. N., Patra, K., Jat, S. L., Singh, R., Abdallah, A. M. 2022. Point placement of late vegetative stage nitrogen splits increase the productivity, N-use efficiency and profitability of tropical maize under decade long conservation agriculture. European Journal of Agronomy 133:126417.

Nkebiwe, P. M., Weinmann, M., Bar-Tal, A., Müller, T. 2016. Fertilizer placement to improve crop nutrient acquisition and yield: A review and meta-analysis. Field Crops Research 196:389-401

Olsen, S. R. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate (No. 939). US Department of Agriculture.

Rana, K. S., Choudhary, A. K., Sepat, S., Bana, R. S. and Dass, A. 2014. Methodological and Analytical Agronomy, pp 276. Post Graduate School, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India

Sepat, S., Phogat, B., Bana, R.S., Kumar, D. and Meena, S.L. 2023. Assessment of precise nutrient management through nutrient expert on productivity and profitability of zero-till maize. Indian Journal of Agronomy 68(4): 379-385.

Watson, D. J. 1952. The physiological basis of variation in yield. Advances in Agronomy 4: 101–45

Yankov, P. and Drumeva, M. 2017. Effect of the soil tillage system on the root development of maize. Romanian Agricultural Research 34:113-119.

Published

2026-04-13

Issue

Section

Research Communication

How to Cite

Teekam Singh, Sonnad, P., G.D., S. ., Das, T., Kaur, R. ., & Singh, R. (2026). Effect of tillage and precision nutrient placement on growth and productivity of maize (Zea mays L.). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 69(2). https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v69i2.5477