Effect of different planting geometry of transplanted pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) as an intercrop in young arecanut (Areca catechu) garden at Southern Transitional Zone of Karnataka, India

Authors

  • H.G. SANNATHIMAAPPA AHRS, Kathalagere, Davanagere Dist., Karnataka 577 219
  • A.H. KUMAR NAIK AICRP on Groundnut, ZAHRS, Babbur Farm, Hiriyur, Chitradurga Dist., Karnataka 577 598
  • MHANUMANTHAPPA University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur, Karnataka 584 104

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v68i4.5459

Keywords:

Nutrient, Pigeonpea, Transplanting, Yield, Uptake

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2017–18, 2018–19 and 2019–20, to study the influence of planting methods on growth and productivity of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design with 8 treatment combinations and replicated thrice. Pooled data indicated that transplanted pigeonpea at 60 cm × 30 cm geometry gave significantly higher pigeonpea seed and stalk yield (2,353 and 6,533 kg/ha respectively), and it was followed by 60 cm × 60 cm spacing (2,072 and 5,852 kg/ha respectively). The above-mentioned treatments also recorded significantly higher total uptake of nitrogen (129.18 and 123.39 kg/ha respectively), phosphorus (36.84 and 32.40 kg/ha respectively) and potassium (62.57 and 57.58 kg/ha respectively), whereas, higher available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (246.64, 35.87 and 155.65 kg/ ha respectively) were recorded in 180 cm × 30 cm. Further higher nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content in arecanut leaf (Areca catechu L.) was observed in 60 cm × 60 cm (1.72 %), 120 cm × 30 cm (0.260 and 1.20 %) as compared to other planting geometry in young arecanut garden.

References

Bansal, Amrit Kaur. 2011. Effect of organic, inorganic and bio-fertilizer in soil fertility under double cropping system in rainfed red soils. Indian Journal Agronomy 45(2): 242–247.

Bhriguvanshi, S.R. 1988. Long term effect of high doses of farm yard manure on soil properties and crop yield. Journal of Indian Society of Soil Science 36: 787–790.

Dong, H., Li, W., Enejia, A.E. and Zhang, D. 2012. Nitrogen rate and plant density effects on yield and late-season leaf senescence of cotton raised on a saline field. Field Crops Research 126: 137–144.

Handayanto E., Giller, K.R. and Cadisch, G. 1997. Regulating N release from legume tree prunings by mixing residues of different quality. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 29: 1,417–1,426.

Kumar, S. and Singh, B.P. 2011. Response of pigeonpea genotypes to level of phosphorus and sulphur. Annals of Plant and Soil Research 13(1): 53–55.

Lal, T. and Singh, D. 2007. Effect of preceding crops and nitrogen levels on drymatter accumulation and nitrogen use efficiency in wheat. Journal of Research, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 44(1): 1–5.

Legha, P.K. and Dhingra, K.K. 1992. Phenology and yield potential of arhar cv. T-21 as influenced by planting pattern and time of sowing. Crop Research 5(1): 157–159.

Mohite, A.A., Pol, P.S. and Umarani, N.K. 1993. Response of rainy season pigeonpea to spacing and fertilizer. Indian Journal of Agronomy 38(2): 314–315.

Mula, M.G., Saxena, K.B., Kumar, R.V. and Rathore, A. 2011. Influence of spacing and irrigation on the seed yield of a CMS line ‘ICPA 2043’ of hybrid pigeonpea. Journal of Food legumes 24(3): 202–206.

Murali, K., Sheshadri, T. and Byregowda, M. 2014. Effect of pigeonpea transplanting on growth, yield and economics in sole and finger millet intercropping system under late sown conditions. Journal of Food legumes 27: 28–31.

Nagamani, G., Rao. P.G. and Rao, D.S.K. 1995. Response of pigeonpea cultivars to plant densities in post-rainy season. Journal of Maharashtra Agricultural Universities 20(1): 125–126.

Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. 1967. Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers pp. 167–174. Indian council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.

Parameswari, K., Vanagamudi, K. and Kavitha, S. 2003. Effect of spacing on hybrid seed yield of pigeonpea hybrid CoPH-2. Madras Agricultural Journal 90(10–12): 691–696.

Pavan, A.S, Nagalikar, V.P, Pujari, B.T. and Halepyati, A.S. 2009. Influence of planting geometry on the growth characters, seed yield and economics of transplanted pigeonpea. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 24(3): 390–392.

Sakala, W.D., Cadisch, G. and Giller, K.E. 2000. Interactions between residues of maize and pigeonpea and mineral N fertilizers during decomposition and N mineralization. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32: 699–706

Shaik, Mohammed. 1997. Relative performance of pigeonpea genotypes and their response to row spacing. Indian Journal Pulses Research 10(1): 14–18.

Sharma, A.R. and Behera, U.K. 2009. Nitrogen contribution through sesbania green manure and dual-purpose legumes in maize–wheat cropping system: Agronomic and economic considerations. Plant and Soil 325: 289–304.

Sharma, N., Murty, N.S., Mall, P. and Bhardwaj, S.B. 2018. Ananalysis on the yield and yield contributing characters of ricein tarai region of Uttarakhand. International Journal of Chemical Study 6(3): 42–47.

Sujatha, S. and Bhat, Ravi. 2015. Resource use and benefits of mixed farming approach in arecanut ecosystem in India. Agricultural Systems 141: 126–137.

Willey R.W., Rao, M.R. and Natarajn, M. 1980. Traditional cropping systems with pigeonpea and their improvement. (In) Proceedings of International Workshop on Pigeonpea, held on 15 December 1980 at the International Crops Research insti tute3 for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, Hyderabad, India, pp. 11–25

Downloads

Published

2024-02-09

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

Effect of different planting geometry of transplanted pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) as an intercrop in young arecanut (Areca catechu) garden at Southern Transitional Zone of Karnataka, India. (2024). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 68(4), 386-391. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v68i4.5459