Production efficiency, forage yield, nutrient uptake and quality of sorghum sudan grass hybrid (Sorghum bicolor × Sorghum sudanense) + cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) intercropping system as influenced by sowing methods and varying seed rates of cowpea
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v63i2.5397Keywords:
Broadcast sowing, Green fodder yield, Intercropping system, Nutrient uptake, Sorghum sudan grass hybridAbstract
A field experiment was carried out at Palampur, Himachal Pradesh, during the rainy (kharif) seasons of 2012 and 2013, to study the effect of sowing methods and varying seed rates of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] on forage yield of sorghum sudan grass hybrid [Sorghum bicolour (L.) Moench. × Sorghum sudanense (Piper) Stapf.] and cowpea. Broadcast sowing of sorghum sudan grass hybrid (SSGH) with 75% recommended seed rate of cowpea (33.75 kg/ha) realized significantly higher plant height, shoot number, SSGH and cowpea dry-matter accumulation, total green forage yield (34.18 t/ha), dry forage yield (10.08 t/ha) and production efficiency. Broadcast sowing of SSGH with recommended seed rate of cowpea resulted in significantly higher N (195.17 kg/ha), P (21.52 kg/ha) and K (56.86 kg/ha) uptake. Further, broadcast sowing of SSGH with 75% recommended seed rate of cowpea gave highest net returns ( 32,001/ha), benefit: cost ratio (1.57), SSGH-equivalent yield (SSGHEY) and was followed by broadcast sowing of SSGH with recommended seed rate of cowpea.
References
Allen, L.H. 1974. Model of light penetration into a wide row crop.
Agronomy Journal 66 (1): 41–47.
Babu, R., Gumaste, S., Jayanne, M., Patil, J.C., Prabhakar, A.S. and
Meli, S.S. 1994. Effect of mixing cowpea with maize genotypes on forage yield and quality. Forage Research 20(4):
–249.
Barik, A.K. and Tiwari, D.P. 1996. Growth and herbage yield of
maize, sweet sudan and cowpea when grown solely and cereals together with cowpea. Forage Research 22(2 and 3):
–82.
Dhar, S., Das, S.K., Kumar, S. and Tripathi, S.B. 2006. Response offodder sorghum to different weed management techniques
and nitrogen levels. Indian Journal of Agronomy 51(4):
–313.
Grof, B.L. 1981. The performance of Andropo gongayanus–legume
associations in Colombia. Journal of Agricultural Science
(1): 233–237.
Krishna, A., Raikhakhar, and Reddy, A.S. 1998. Effect of planting
pattern and nitrogen on fodder maize (Zea mays) intercropped with cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Indian Journal of
Agronomy 43(2): 237–240.
Kumar, A. 2006. Effect of date and method of sowing on the green
forage yield of sorghum sudan grass under alkali water using irrigation. Forage Research 31(4): 247–250.
Kumar, R.K. and Bhanumurthy, V.B. 2001. Effect of staggered sowing and relative proportion of cowpea on the performance of
maize + cowpea. Forage Research 27(2): 105–110.
Sharma, R.P., Raman, K.P., Singh, A.K., Poddar, B.K. and Kumar,
R. 2009. Production potential and economics of multicut
fodder sorghum (Sorghum sudanense) with legumes intercropping under various row proportions. Range Management and Agroforestry 30(1): 67–69.
Sheoran, P., Sardana, V., Singh, S. and Bhushan, B. 2010.
Bioeconomic evaluation of rainfed maize (Zea mays)-based
intercropping systems with blackgram (Vigna mungo) under
different spatial arrangements. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 80(3): 244–247.
Surve, V.H., Arvadia, M.K. and Tandel, B.B. 2012. Effect of row
ratio in cereal–legume fodder under intercropping systems
on biomass production and economics. International Journal of Agriculture: Research and Review 2(1): 34–35.
Thomas, C.G. 2003. Forage Crop Production in the Tropics. (In)
Ground Legumes, edn 2, 149 pp. Kalyani Publishers, New
Delhi.
Wahua, T.A.T. 1983. Nutrient uptake by intercropped maize and
cowpea and a concept of nutrient supplementation index
(NSI). Experimental Agriculture 19(1): 263–275.
