Effect of weed control on weed competition, soil microbial activity and rice productivity in conservation agriculture-based direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa)– wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v63i2.5392Keywords:
Conservation agriculture, Dehydrogenase activity, Direct-seeded rice, Microbial biomass carbon, Weed, YieldAbstract
A field experiment was carried out during 2012–13 and 2013–14 at New Delhi, to evaluate the effects of weedcontrol options on weed interference, microbial activity and direct-seeded rice (DSR) productivity in a conservation agriculture (CA)-based rice (Oryza sativa L.)–wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori et Paol) cropping system. The CA practices such as brown manuring, mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek] residue (MR) and rice-residue (RR) retention, zero tillage (ZT) significantly influenced weed density, microbial activity and crop yield. Grassy weeds were more dominant among the weeds. The DSR practices encountered more weed infestations than transplanted rice (TPR). The sequential applications of pendimethalin @ 1.5 kg/ha as pre-emergence, and bispyribac-Na @ 25 g/ha at 25 days after sowing/ transplanting (DAS/ DAT) as post-emergence resulted in better control of weeds and higher weed-control efficiency (WCE), but this combination plus 1 hand-weeding (HW) at 45 DAS was the best weed-control option in DSR. Higher WCE of 50% and 52% obtained from this treatment respectively, in 2012 and 2013. These herbicides applications slightly reduced microbial activity at 40 DAS. Soil microbial activity positively responded to CA practices. Soil-dehydrogenase activity (DHA) and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) were significantly higher in DSR than TPR. The rice yields were comparable between the TPR – ZTW and DSR + MR – ZTW + RR – SMB + wheat residue (WR) systems, but higher than in other CA-based DSR-wheat systems. Treatment DSR + MR – ZTW + RR – SMB + WR provided higher grain yield 4.41 t/ha and 4.53 t/ha in 2012 and 2013, respectively.
References
Bhattacharyya, R., Das, T.K., Sudhishri, S., Dudwal, B., Sharma,
A.R., Bhatia, A. and Singh, G. 2015. Conservation agriculture effects on soil organic carbon accumulation and crop
productivity under a rice–wheat cropping system in the western Indo-Gangetic Plains. European Journal of Agronomy
: 11–21.
Buhler, D.D., Stoltenberg, D.E., Becker, R.L. and Gunsolus, J.L.
Perennial weed populations after 14 years of variable
tillage and cropping practices. Weed Science 42: 205–209.
Chauhan, B.S., Yadav, A. and Malik, R.K. 2002. Zero tillage and its
impact on soil properties: a brief review. (In) Herbicide Resistance Management and Zero Tillage in Rice–Wheat System. (Eds) Malik, R.K., Balyan, R.S., Yadav, A., Pahwa,
S.K. 4–6 March, 2002. Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana
Agricultural University, Hisar, India, 109–114p.
Das, T.K. 2008. Weed Science- Basics and Applications, pp 901.
Jain Brothers, New Delhi, India.
Das, T.K. and Yaduraju, N.T. 2012. The effects of combining modified sowing methods with herbicide mixtures on weed interference in wheat. International Journal of Pest Management
(4): 311–320.
Das, T.K., Sakhuja, P.K. and Zelleke, H. 2010. Herbicide efficacy
and non-target toxicity in highland rainfed maize of Eastern
Ethiopia. International Journal of Pest Management 56(4):
–325.
Gill, M.S., Kumar, A. and Kumar, P. 2006. Growth and yield of rice cultivars under various methods and time of sowing. Indian
Journal of Agronomy 51: 123–127.
Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for
Agricultural Research, edn 2, pp. 591. Johns & Sons, New
York.
Kumar, V. and Ladha, J.K. 2011. Direct-seeding of rice: recent developments and future research needs. Advances in
Agronomy 111: 297–413.
Mishra, J.S. and Singh, V.P. 2012. Tillage and weed control effects
on productivity of a dry seeded rice–wheat system on a
Vertisol in Central India. Soil and Tillage Research 12: 11–
Paul, S., Prasanna, R., Lata and Wattal, Dhar D. 2009. A Manual for
Agricultural Microbiologists. Division of Microbiology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110 012,
pp. 27–28.
Sebiomo, A., Ogundero V.W. and Bankole, S.A. 2011. Effect of four
herbicides on microbial population, soil organic matter and
dehydrogenase activity. African Journal of Biotechnology
(5): 770–778.
Singh, S., Bhushan., L., Ladha, J.K., Gupta, R.K., Rao, A.N. and
Sivaprasad, B. 2006. Weed management in dry-seeded rice
(Oryza sativa) cultivated in the furrow-irrigated raised-bed
planting system. Crop Protection 25: 487–49.
Susha, V.S., Das, T.K., Sharma, A.R. and Nath, C.P. 2014. Carryover effect of weed-management practices of maize (Zea
mays) on weed dynamics and productivity of succeeding
zero and conventional till wheat (Triticum aestivum). Indian
Journal of Agronomy 59(1): 41–47.
Tuti, M.D. and Das, T.K. 2011. Carry-over effect of metribuzin applied to soybean (Glycine max) on weeds and wheat (Triticum aestivum) under zero and conventional tillage. Indian
Journal of Agronomy 56(2): 121–126.
Unger, I.M., Kennedy, A.C. and Muzika, R.M. 2009. Flooding effects on soil microbial communities. Applied Soil Ecology
: 1–8.
Wardle, D.A., Yeates, G.W., Nicholson, K.S., Bonner, K.I. and
Watson, R.N. 1999. Response of soil microbial biomass dynamics, activity and plant litter decomposition to agricultural
intensification over a seven-year period. Soil Biology and
Biochemistry 31(12): 1,707–1,720.
