Production potential and economic viability of bed planted wheat (Triticum aestivum) as influenced by different intercropping systems and levels of nutrients applied to intercrops
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v63i1.5369Keywords:
Bed-planted wheat, Intercropping systems, System productivity, Wheat-equivalent yieldAbstract
A field experiment was conducted at the Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, during the winter (rabi) seasons of 2012–13 and 2013–14 in a split-plot design with 3 replications. The main plots treatments involved 5 intercropping systems, viz. wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) + spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.), wheat + fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graccum L.), wheat + fodder oats (Avena sativa L.), wheat + canola (Brassica napus L.) and wheat + linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.). Each main plot was divided into 4 subplots to allocate the different levels of recommended dose of nutrients, i.e. 0, 50, 75 and 100% of recommended dose of nutrients to intercrops. Higher biological, straw and grain yields of wheat were observed in wheat + spinach (12.17, 6.77, 5.40 t/ha) intercropping system which was statistically at par with wheat + fenugreek (12.01, 6.72, 5.29 t/ha) and wheat + fodder oats (11.74, 6.61, 5.12 t/ha), but significantly higher than wheat + linseed (11.37, 6.29, 5.07 t/ha) and wheat + canola (10.39, 5.64, 4.75 t/ha) intercropping system. Significantly lowest values biological, straw and grain yield were observed in wheat + canola intercropping system than the rest of the intercropping systems. Wheat + fodder oats intercropping system exhibited significantly higher wheat-equivalent yield, system productivity and the economic returns followed by the wheat + spinach intercropping system compared with the other intercropping systems. With the increased dose of nutrients from 0 to 100% applied to intercrops on area basis, there was progressive increase in yield of intercrops. The application of 100% recommended dose of nutrients to the intercrops resulted in significantly higher value of wheat-equivalent yield, system productivity and economic returns than the other recommended dose of nutrients applied to the intercrops.
References
Chapagain, T. and Riseman, A. 2014. Intercropping wheat and
beans: effects on agronomic performance and land productivity. Crop Sciences 54: 2,285–2,293.
Crews, T.E. and Peoples, M.B. 2005. Can the synchrony of nitrogen
supply and crop demand be improved in legume and fertilizer-based agro-ecosystems? Nutrient Cycling in Agor-ecosystems 72: 101–120.
Eskandari, H. 2011. Intercropping of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
and bean (Vicia faba): Effects of complementarity and competition of intercrop components in resource consumption on
dry matter production and weed growth. African Journal of
Biotechnology 10: 17,755–17,762.
Imran, M., Ali, A., Waseem, M., Tahir, M., Mohsin, A.U., Shehzad,
M., Ghaffari, M. and Rehman, H. 2011. Bio-economic assessment of sunflower mungbean intercropping system at
different planting geometry. International Research Journal of Agricultural and Soil Sciences 1: 126–36.
Khan, M., Khan, R.U., Wahab, A. and Rashid, A. 2005. Yield and
yield components of wheat as influenced by intercropping of
chickpea, lentil and rapeseed in different proportions. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 42: 3–4.
Kumar, M. 2008. Studies on intercropping of mustard/safflower with
chickpea and wheat. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Agricultural
Sciences, Dharwad, India.
Lithourgidis, A.S., Dordas, C.A., Damalas, C.A. and Vlachostergios,
D.N. 2011. Annual intercrops: an alternative pathway for
sustainable agriculture. Australian Journal of Crop Sciences
: 396–410.
