Effect of plant spacing and weed-management practices on growth, biomass and steviol glycosides of candyleaf under western Himalayas

Authors

  • SWATI WALIA
  • RAKESH KUMAR

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v64i3.5287

Keywords:

Candyleaf, Plant spacing, Steviol glycoside, Weed-management, Yield

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2015 and 2016 to study the effect of plant spacing and weed-man- agement practices on development, yield and steviol glycosides of candyleaf [Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni) Bertoni] in the western Himalayas. Treatments included 2 plant spacings (45 cm 45 cm and 60 cm 45 cm) and 5 weed- management practices [weedy check, weed-free, hand-weeding, pendimethalin at 1.5 kg/ha followed by 1 hand- weeding (HW) at 40 days after spray (DAS) and oxyfluorfen at 0.25 kg/ha followed by 1 HW at 40 DAS]. Weed population and weed dry biomass under different plant spacing remained unaffected during both the years. Num- ber of leaves (1792.58), dry leaf biomass (1481.32 kg/ha) and total dry biomass (3914.65 kg/ha) were significantly high under narrow spacing. However, total steviol glycosides (%) were significantly high (11.05%) under wider row spacing. Weed population (9.39/m2) and dry biomass of weeds (11.53 g/m2) were significantly reduced by the ap- plication of oxyfluorfen. Significantly higher number of leaves (2010.83), dry leaf biomass (1498.90 kg/ha) and to- tal dry biomass (4256.45 kg/ha) were obtained with oxyfluorfen during both the years. Steviol glycoside content (12.05%) was significantly higher in hand-weeded plots. A spacing of 45 cm 45 cm with application of oxyfluorfen could manage weeds efficiently for the perennial crop of candyleaf a natural sweetner under western Himalayas.

References

Amador-Ramirez, M.D., Mojarro-Davila, F. and Velasquez-Valle, R. 2007. Efficacy and economics of weed control for dry chile

pepper. Crop Protection 26(4): 677682.

Angelini, L.G., Martini, A., Passera, B. and Tavarini, S. 2018. Cultivation of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni and associated challenges. (In:) Sweeteners Series in Phytochemistry. Mrillon, J.M. and Ramawat, K. (Eds). Springer, Cham.

Azimah, A.K., Ismail, B.S. and Juraimi, A.S. 2018. Critical period for weed control in Stevia rebaudiana (Bert.) Bertoni. Journal of Tropical Agriculture and Food Science 46(2): 9198.

Harrington, K.C., Southward, R.C., Kitchen, K.L. and He, X.Z. 2011. Investigation of herbicides tolerated by Stevia rebaudiana crops. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 39(1): 2133.

Jadhav, P.B., Singh, R. and Kamble, D.R. 2015. Effect of weed control methods on growth and yield of groundnut. Advance Research Journal of Crop Improvement 6(2): 151157.

Kumar, R., Sood, S., Sharma, S., Kasana, R.C., Pathania, V.L.,

Singh, B. and Singh, R.D. 2014. Effect of plant spacing and organic mulch on growth, yield and quality of natural sweetener plant Stevia and soil fertility in western Himalayas. International Journal of Plant Production 8(3): 311334.

Kumar, V., Dhankhar, S.K., Vilas, C.A. and Yadav, N. 2016. Effect of spacing on growth and yield parameters of two varieties of okra, Abelmoschus esculantus (L.) Moench. International Journal of Farm Sciences 6: 163168.

Pandey, A.K., Prakash, V., Singh, R.D. and Mani, V.P. 2001. Integrated weed management in maize (Zea mays). Indian Jour

nal of Agronomy 46(2): 260265.

Sharma, S., Walia, S., Singh, B. and Kumar, R. 2016. Comprehensive review on agro technologies of low-calorie natural sweetener Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni): a boon to diabetic patients. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 96(6): 1,8671,879.

Singh, S.K., Singh, U., Maurya, D.K., Dwivedi, A.P. and Dev, J. 2017. Integrated weed management practices in turmeric (Curcuma longa). Indian Journal of Agronomy 6(23): 354

Downloads

Published

2001-10-10

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

SWATI WALIA, & RAKESH KUMAR. (2001). Effect of plant spacing and weed-management practices on growth, biomass and steviol glycosides of candyleaf under western Himalayas. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 64(3), 378-385. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v64i3.5287