Productivity and profitability of tropical sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) varieties under various land configurations in Vertisols
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v64i2.5270Keywords:
Benefit cost ratio, Flat bed, Net realization, Raised bed, Ridge furrow, Root biomass, Sugar beetAbstract
A field experiment was conducted during the winter (rabi) season of 201516 at Navsari, Gujarat to study the response of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) varieties to land configuration under south Gujarat climatic conditions. Nine treatment combinations, comprising 3 land configurations, viz. L , flat bed; L , ridge furrow; and L , raised 1 2 3 bed, in main plots and 3 varieties, viz. V , SV 887; V , SV 889 and V , SV 892 in subplots were evaluated in 1 2 3 split-plot design with 4 replications. Significantly the maximum values for fresh foliage, root and total biomass of sugarbeet were observed in raised bed (23.36, 68.36 and 91.72 t/ha), being 40.3, 22.3 and 26.5% higher, respec- tively, over flat bed. Similarly, raised bed also resulted in the maximum net realization ( 127.6 103/ha) and ben- efit: cost ratio (2.32). Sugar beet showed the highest fresh foliage, root and total biomass (21.53, 64.63 and 86.16 t/ha) in variety SV 887, with increased magnitude of fresh foliage, root and total biomass to the tune of 27.5, 10.6 and 14.4%, respectively, over variety SV 889. Similarly, variety SV 887 also exhibited the maximum net re- alization ( 118.2 103/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.18). The treatment combination involving raised bed with vari- ety SV 887 accrued the maximum net realization ( 131.4 103/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.39) and proved sig- nificantly superior to all the other treatment combinations except raised bed with all varieties and ridge furrow with variety SV 887. The results revealed that planting all the 3 varieties of sugar beet on raised beds and cv. SV 887 under ridge and furrow method performed equally well in heavy black soil of south Gujarat with the maximum pro- ductivity and profitability.References
Ahlawat, I.P.S., Prakash, O. and Saini, G.S. 2002. Scientific CropProduction in India, pp. 576. Aman Publishing House,Meerut, Uttar Pradesh
Ahmad, Z., Shah, P., Kakar, K.M., Sharkawi, H.E., Gama, P.B.S.,Khan, E.A., Honna, T. and Yamamoto, S. 2010. Sugar beet(Beta vulgaris L.) response to different planting methods androw geometries. II. Effect on plant growth and quality. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment 8(2): 785791
Ardeshna, R.B., Arvadia, M.K., Patil, R.G. and Savani, N.G. 2013
Effect of land configuration and soil conditioners on growthand yield of turmeric (Curcuma longa). Indian Journal ofAgronomy 58(3): 412415
Bairagi, A., Paul, S.K., Kader, M.A. and Hossain, M.S. 2013. Yieldof tropical sugar beet as influenced by variety and rate offertilizer application. Pakistan Sugar Journal 28(4): 1320
Bhullar, M.S., Uppal, S.K. and Kapur, M.L. 2009. Effect of agronomic practices and varieties on productivity of sugar beet(Beta vulgaris L.) in semi-arid region of Punjab. Journal ofResearch, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 46(1and 2): 68
Brar, N.S., Dhillon, B.S., Saini, K.S. and Sharma, P.K. 2015
BEHERA AND ARVADIAAgronomy of sugar beet cultivationA review. AgriculturalReviews 36(3): 184197
Deshpande, H.H., Nadagouda, B.T. and Hunshal, C.S. 2015. Sugarbeet response to planting methods and dates of sowing indeccan plateau of peninsular India. International ResearchJournal of Agricultural Economics and Statistics 6(1): 8388
Ferdous, H.M., Khaliq, Q.A. and Karim, A. 2015. Effect of sowingdates on growth and yield of tropical sugar beet. International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research 7(1):5360
Ganapati, R.K., Rahman, M.M., Kabiraj, R.C., Sen, R. and Islam,M.S. 2016. Screening of water stress tolerant sugar beet(Beta vulgaris L.) genotypes. International Journal of Sustainable Crop Production 11(3): 2935
Kaloi, G.M., Mari, A.H., Zubair, M., Panhwar, R.N., Bughio, N.,[Vol. 64, No. 2Junejo, S., Unar, G.S. and Bhutto, M.A. 2014. Performanceof exotic sugar beet varieties under agro-climatic conditionsof lower Sindh. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences24(4): 1,1351,140
Kamble, A.S., Waghmode, B.D., Sagvekar, V.V., Navhale, V.C. andMahadkar,U.V. 2016. Effect of land configuration andmulching on productivity and energy use in groundnut. Indian Journal of Agronomy 61(4): 489494
Marey, S.A. 2015. Affecting each of ridger furrow opener parameters and planting methods on water use efficiency and sugarbeet yield. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 21(6):1,3041,311
Schlinker, G., Sander, G., Decker, M., Schillings, W.K., Burcky, K
and Koch, H.J. 2007. Ridge cultivation of sugar beet recentexperiences and experimental results from Germany. SugarIndustry 132(12): 920924