Effect of weed-management practices on yield and economics of sesame (Sesamum indicum)-based intercropping systems

Authors

  • GAUTAM VEER CHAUHAN
  • RAM PYARE
  • ARVIND KUMAR
  • ASHOK KUMAR
  • JAIBIR TOMAR
  • RANBIR SINGH

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v64i2.5252

Keywords:

Economics, Equivalent yield, Intercropping, Sesame, Weed management

Abstract

The present investigation was conducted during the rainy (kharif) season of 2015 and 2016 at Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, to study the effect of weed management on yield and economics of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.)- based intercropping system. The experiment comprising 12 treatments was laid out in a factorial randomized block design, replicated 4 times. Sesame + blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] intercropping system in 8 : 2 ra- tio (7.17) had the lowest weed population during both the years and on an average, recorded significantly lowest fresh (11.01) and dry weight (3.71) of weeds. The grain yield of sesame was found significantly in the sesame + blackgram (8 : 2) intercropping system during 2015 and 2016. The grain yield of maize (Zea mays L.) and blackgram was maximum in sesame + maize/blackgram under 8 : 2 row ratio and reduced drastically in intercrop- ping sesame + maize and blackgram under 4 : 1 ratio in the 2 years of study. The sesame-equivalent yield was significantly higher under intercropping of sesame + blackgram (8 : 2) over rest of the intercropping treatments. The sesame + blackgram (8 : 2) intercropping treatment was found significantly superior in terms of economics, viz. gross income ( 48.80 103/ha), net returns ( 26.82 103/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.22) on mean basis compared to the remaining intercropping systems, during both years. Among the weed-management practices, hand-weeding reduced the total weeds significantly compared to chemical weed-management practices, followed by alachlor (0.375 kg/ha) and pendimethalin (1.0 kg/ha) respectively. Significant reduction in fresh and dry weight of weeds/m2 was recorded with the hand-weeding. Among the chemical weed-management practices, alachlor treatment resulted in significantly lower fresh and dry-weight of weeds/m2 compared to pendimethalin treatment in both the years. The hand-weeding had a positive effect on grain of sesame with maize and blackgram, sesame equivalent yield, gross income, net income and B: C ratio, which was noted significant response over pendimethalin and alachlor weeding in both years of study. In chemical weed management, post-emergence appliciton of alachlor was found significantly superior over pre-emergence pendimethalin in the 2 years of study.

References

Ashoka, P., Setty, T.K.P., Krishnamurthy, N. and Sreeramulu, K.R

Effect of intercrops and crop geometry on productivity and economics of maize (Zea mays L.)-based intercropping. Mysore Journal of Agricultural Sciences 47(1): 199201

DAC. 2017. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department ofAgriculture and Cooperation, New Delhi

Hailu, Gebru. 2015. A review on the comparative advantages of intercropping to mono-cropping system. Journal of Biology,Agriculture and Healthcare 5(9): 113

Ijoyah, M.O., Idoko, J.A. and Iorlamen, T. 2015. Effects of intra-rowspacing of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) and frequency ofweeding on yields of maizesesame intercrop in Makurdi,Nigeria. International Letters of Natural Sciences 38: 1626

Mathukia, R.K., Sagarka, B.K. and Jadav, C.N. 2015. Integratedweed management in summer sesame. Indian Journal ofWeed Science 47(2): 150152

Moody, K. and Shetty, S.V.R. 1981. Weed-management in intercropping systems. (In) Proceedings of the International Workshop on Intercropping, 1013 January 1979, InternationalCrops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics,Hyderabad, pp. 229237

Mruthul, T., Halepyati, A.S. and Chittapur, B.M. 2015. Chemicalweed management in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.)

Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Science 28(2): 151154

CHAUHAN ET AL

Prasad, K., Singh, R.K. and Pyare, R. 2006. Studies on intercropping of mustard varieties with chickpeas. Indian Journal ofPulses Research 19(1): 7375

Prajapat, K., Shivran, A.C., Choudhary, G.L. and Choudhary, H.R

Influence of planting pattern and sulphur onmungbean (Vigna radiata) and sesame (Sesamum indicum)intercropping under semi-arid region of Rajasthan. IndianJournal of Agronomy 57(1): 8991

Pyare, R., Prasad, K., Kumar, S., Tiwari, R.K. and Sonkar, T.C

Production potential and economics of lentil and mustard in mixed and intercropping system. Plant Archives 8(1):[Vol. 64, No. 2233236

Singh, S., Bawa, S.S., Singh, S. and Sharma, S.C. 2015. Evaluationof maize (Zea mays)-based intercropping for productivity,resource-use efficiency and competition indices in the rainfed foothills of northwest Himalayas. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 85(5): 614621

SPORE (TA). 2006. Sesame: Past and Future. SPORE. (CTA),Netherland, Nigeria, p. 1

Tavella, L.B., Silva, P.S.L., Monteiro, A.L., Oliveira, V.R. andSiqueira, P.L. 2015. Weed control in maize with Gliricidiaintercropping. Planta Daninha 33(2): 249258

Downloads

Published

2001-10-10

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

GAUTAM VEER CHAUHAN, RAM PYARE, ARVIND KUMAR, ASHOK KUMAR, JAIBIR TOMAR, & RANBIR SINGH. (2001). Effect of weed-management practices on yield and economics of sesame (Sesamum indicum)-based intercropping systems. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 64(2), 186-190. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v64i2.5252