Enhancing crop and water productivity of spring maize (Zea mays) through drip fertigation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v64i1.5238Keywords:
Drip fertigation, ETc, Spring maize, Water productivityAbstract
A field experiment was conducted during the spring seasons of 2014 and 2015 at Ludhiana, Punjab, to find out the water and nutrient-efficient drip-fertigation schedule for higher productivity of spring maize (Zea mays L.). The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete-block design and treatment comprise combinations of 3 drip ir- rigation levels [60, 80 and 100% crop evapotranspiration (ETc)] and 4 fertigation levels [100, 80, 60% recom- mended dose of fertilizers (RDF) and soil application of RDF i.e. 125 kg N and 62.5 kg P O /ha]. Drip irrigation at 2 5 100% ETc resulted in the maximum grain yield which was statistically at par with that obtained with 80% ETc but significantly better than 60% ETc. Drip irrigation at 80 and 100% ETc registered 11.9 and 15.8% higher grain yield than 60% ETc because of significantly better growth and yield attributes resulting from adequate supply of mois- ture. However, irrigation water productivity (WP ) was significantly higher in 60% ETc than 80 and 100% ETc, but I total water productivity (WP ) remained statistically at par between 60 and 80% ETc. Net returns and benefit: cost T were also the highest from crop drip irrigated at 100% ETc and least from that drip irrigated at 60% ETc. Similarly, drip fertigation at 80% RDF while being statistically at par with drip fertigation at 100% RDF recorded significantly higher grain yield than drip fertigation at 60% RDF and soil application at 100% RDF. Hence spring maize should be drip fertigated at 80% ETc. with 80% RDF to save 20% nutrients and irrigation water with higher net returns and benefit: cost.References
Abd El-Wahed, M.H. and Ali, E.A. 2013. Effects of irrigation system, amounts of irrigation water and mulching on corn yield,water use efficiency and net profit. Agricultural Water Management 120: 6471
Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Roes, D. and Smith, M. 1998. Crop[Vol. 64, No. 1evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop waterrequirements. FAO No. 56. Food and AgricultureOrganication of United Nations, Rome, Italy
Brar, A.S., Buttar, G.S. and Sharma, R. 2018. Water and energy productivity of rice as influenced by duration of cultivars, datesof transplanting and irrigation regime in north-western India
Paddy and Water Environment 16: 655663
Brar, S.K., Mahal, S.S., Brar, A.S., Vashist, K.K., Sharma, N. andButtar, G.S. 2012. Transplanting time and seedling age affectwater productivity, rice yield and quality in north-west India
Agricultural Water Management 115: 217222
Dagdelen, N., Yilmaz, E., Sezgin, F. and Gurbuz, T. 2006. Wateryield relation and water use efficiency of cotton and secondcrop corn in western Turkey. Agricultural Water Management 82: 6385
Dar, E.A., Brar, A.S. and Singh K.B. 2017 Waer use and productivity of drip irrigated wheat under variable climatic and soilmoisture regimes in North-West, India. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 248: 919
El-Hendawy, S. and Schmidhalter, U. 2010. Optimal coupling combinations between irrigation frequency and rate for drip-irrigated maize grown on sandy soil. Agricultural Water Management 97: 439448
El-Hendawy, S.E., El-Lattief, E. A., Ahmed, A. S. and Schmidhalter,U. 2008. Irrigation rate and plant density effects on yield andwater use efficiency of drip-irrigated corn. Agricultural Water Management 95: 836844
GoI, 2015. Statistical abstract. Government of India
www.indiastat.comIbrahim, M.M., El-Baroudy, A.A. and Taha, A.M. 2016. Irrigationand fertigation scheduling under drip irrigation for maizecrop in sandy soil. International Agrophysics 30: 4755
Irmak, S., Djaman, K. and Rudnick, D.R. 2016. Effect of full andlimited irrigation amount and frequency on subsurface dripirrigated maize evapotranspiration, yield, water use efficiency and yield response factors. Irrigation Science 34:271286
Kaur, A. and Brar, A.S. 2016. Influence of mulching and irrigationscheduling on productivity and water use of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) in north-western India. Irrigation Science34: 261269
Singh, K.B., Jalota, S.K. and Gupta, R.K. 2015. Soil water balanceand response of spring maize (Zea mays) to mulching anddifferential irrigation in Punjab. Indian Journal of Agronomy60: 279284
Singh, M. and Vashist, K. K. 2016. Enhancing productivity of springmaize (Zea mays) through planting methods, varieties andirrigation levels in Punjab. Indian Journal of Agronomy 61:348353
Sun, H.Y., Shen, Y.J., Yu, Q., Flerchinger, G.N., Zhang, Y.Q., Liu,C.M. and Zhang, X.Y. 2010. Effect of precipitation changeon water balance and WUE of the winter wheatsummermaize rotation in North China Plain. Agricultural WaterManagement 97: 1,1391,154
Szeles, A.V., Megyes, A. and Nagy, J. 2012. Irrigation and nitrogeneffects on the leaf chlorophyll content and grain yield ofmaize in different crop years. Agricultural Water Management 107: 133144