Enhancing crop and water productivity of spring maize (Zea mays) through drip fertigation

Authors

  • A.S. BRAR
  • G.S. BUTTAR
  • KRISHAN KUMAR VASHIST

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v64i1.5238

Keywords:

Drip fertigation, ETc, Spring maize, Water productivity

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the spring seasons of 2014 and 2015 at Ludhiana, Punjab, to find out the water and nutrient-efficient drip-fertigation schedule for higher productivity of spring maize (Zea mays L.). The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete-block design and treatment comprise combinations of 3 drip ir- rigation levels [60, 80 and 100% crop evapotranspiration (ETc)] and 4 fertigation levels [100, 80, 60% recom- mended dose of fertilizers (RDF) and soil application of RDF i.e. 125 kg N and 62.5 kg P O /ha]. Drip irrigation at 2 5 100% ETc resulted in the maximum grain yield which was statistically at par with that obtained with 80% ETc but significantly better than 60% ETc. Drip irrigation at 80 and 100% ETc registered 11.9 and 15.8% higher grain yield than 60% ETc because of significantly better growth and yield attributes resulting from adequate supply of mois- ture. However, irrigation water productivity (WP ) was significantly higher in 60% ETc than 80 and 100% ETc, but I total water productivity (WP ) remained statistically at par between 60 and 80% ETc. Net returns and benefit: cost T were also the highest from crop drip irrigated at 100% ETc and least from that drip irrigated at 60% ETc. Similarly, drip fertigation at 80% RDF while being statistically at par with drip fertigation at 100% RDF recorded significantly higher grain yield than drip fertigation at 60% RDF and soil application at 100% RDF. Hence spring maize should be drip fertigated at 80% ETc. with 80% RDF to save 20% nutrients and irrigation water with higher net returns and benefit: cost.

References

Abd El-Wahed, M.H. and Ali, E.A. 2013. Effects of irrigation system, amounts of irrigation water and mulching on corn yield,water use efficiency and net profit. Agricultural Water Management 120: 6471

Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Roes, D. and Smith, M. 1998. Crop[Vol. 64, No. 1evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop waterrequirements. FAO No. 56. Food and AgricultureOrganication of United Nations, Rome, Italy

Brar, A.S., Buttar, G.S. and Sharma, R. 2018. Water and energy productivity of rice as influenced by duration of cultivars, datesof transplanting and irrigation regime in north-western India

Paddy and Water Environment 16: 655663

Brar, S.K., Mahal, S.S., Brar, A.S., Vashist, K.K., Sharma, N. andButtar, G.S. 2012. Transplanting time and seedling age affectwater productivity, rice yield and quality in north-west India

Agricultural Water Management 115: 217222

Dagdelen, N., Yilmaz, E., Sezgin, F. and Gurbuz, T. 2006. Wateryield relation and water use efficiency of cotton and secondcrop corn in western Turkey. Agricultural Water Management 82: 6385

Dar, E.A., Brar, A.S. and Singh K.B. 2017 Waer use and productivity of drip irrigated wheat under variable climatic and soilmoisture regimes in North-West, India. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 248: 919

El-Hendawy, S. and Schmidhalter, U. 2010. Optimal coupling combinations between irrigation frequency and rate for drip-irrigated maize grown on sandy soil. Agricultural Water Management 97: 439448

El-Hendawy, S.E., El-Lattief, E. A., Ahmed, A. S. and Schmidhalter,U. 2008. Irrigation rate and plant density effects on yield andwater use efficiency of drip-irrigated corn. Agricultural Water Management 95: 836844

GoI, 2015. Statistical abstract. Government of India

www.indiastat.comIbrahim, M.M., El-Baroudy, A.A. and Taha, A.M. 2016. Irrigationand fertigation scheduling under drip irrigation for maizecrop in sandy soil. International Agrophysics 30: 4755

Irmak, S., Djaman, K. and Rudnick, D.R. 2016. Effect of full andlimited irrigation amount and frequency on subsurface dripirrigated maize evapotranspiration, yield, water use efficiency and yield response factors. Irrigation Science 34:271286

Kaur, A. and Brar, A.S. 2016. Influence of mulching and irrigationscheduling on productivity and water use of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) in north-western India. Irrigation Science34: 261269

Singh, K.B., Jalota, S.K. and Gupta, R.K. 2015. Soil water balanceand response of spring maize (Zea mays) to mulching anddifferential irrigation in Punjab. Indian Journal of Agronomy60: 279284

Singh, M. and Vashist, K. K. 2016. Enhancing productivity of springmaize (Zea mays) through planting methods, varieties andirrigation levels in Punjab. Indian Journal of Agronomy 61:348353

Sun, H.Y., Shen, Y.J., Yu, Q., Flerchinger, G.N., Zhang, Y.Q., Liu,C.M. and Zhang, X.Y. 2010. Effect of precipitation changeon water balance and WUE of the winter wheatsummermaize rotation in North China Plain. Agricultural WaterManagement 97: 1,1391,154

Szeles, A.V., Megyes, A. and Nagy, J. 2012. Irrigation and nitrogeneffects on the leaf chlorophyll content and grain yield ofmaize in different crop years. Agricultural Water Management 107: 133144

Downloads

Published

2001-10-10

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

A.S. BRAR, G.S. BUTTAR, & KRISHAN KUMAR VASHIST. (2001). Enhancing crop and water productivity of spring maize (Zea mays) through drip fertigation. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 64(1), 87-92. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v64i1.5238