Effect of irrigation scheduling on performance of summer legumes grown in 'association of sugarcane
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v50i4.5127Keywords:
Sugarcane, Intercropping, IW CPE ratio, CEY, Monetary returnsAbstract
A field experiment was conducted during 2001-03 to find out an optimum irrigation schedule for intercrops grown in association with spring sugarcane, on silty clay-loam soil, having 23.4% moisture at field capacity and 8.6% at permanent wilting point (PWP). Daily evapotranspiration (ET) varied from 3.3 to 16.8 mmlday. Mungbean (Phaseolus radiatus L.), urdbean (F! mungo L.) and cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] gave highest yield of 4.1, 3.85 qlha and 73.0 qha, respectively with irrigation at, 1W : CPE ratio of 1.2 compared to 3.25, 2.75 and 6.10 qlha with irrigations at flowering and pod-filling stage. All the intercrops reduced cane yield due to decline in number of millable canes and cane weight. Mean reduction in cane yield was 14.2% with cowpea, 11.5% with urdbean and 9.2% with mungbean. Irrigation at 1.2 IW : CPE ratio resulted in highest cane yield of 97.0 tonnesl ha, being respectively 3.7, 8.1 ; : CPE ratio of 1.0, 0.8, and irrigations at critical growth nd 13.3% higher than IW stages. Sugarcane + cowpea g.we highest mean cane-equivalent yield (1 07.0 tonneslha), being 6.8, 10.0, and 8.7% more than sole sugarcane and intercropping with urdbean and mungbean respectively. Sugarcane inter- cropped with cowpea gave highest gross return of R s 101,6501ha followed by sugarcane alone (Rs 951 90) as against Rs 92,435 with sugarcane + urdbean. Respective Benefit : cost ratio was 0.89, 0.90 and 0.73. Irrigation applied at 1.2 IW : CPE ratio gave significantly highest cane-equivalent yield (1 09.5 tonneslha) with benefit : cost ratio of 0.85 as against 92.4 tonneslha and 0.77 with irrigation at critical growth stages of intercrops.References
Gulati, J.M.L., Nayak, B.C. and Mishra, M.M. 1998. Biological and economic potential of autumn planted sugarcane in sole and intercropping system under varying moisture regimes. Zn-dian Journal ofAgricubura1 Sciences 68 (7) : 344-346.
Thanki, J.D., Patel, R.G., Patel, H.S. and Raman, S. 2000. Response of phasic irrigation on sugarcane crop under south Gujarat condition.Indian Sugar 49(11) :83 1-834.
Malavia, D.D., Patel, K.P. and Ramani, V.B. 1992. Cane yield and
Downloads
Published
2001-10-10
Issue
Section
Research Paper
How to Cite
N.S. RANA, SANJAY KUMAR, & S.K. SAINI. (2001). Effect of irrigation scheduling on performance of summer legumes grown in ’association of sugarcane. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 50(4), 281-284. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v50i4.5127




