Response of wheat (Triticum aestivtm) to seeding methods and weed management

Authors

  • I.B. PANBEY
  • KULBEEP KUMAR

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v50i1.5059

Keywords:

Wheat, Unidirectional sowing, Broadcasting, Criss-cross sowing, Herbicides, Yield

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the winter seasons of 2000-2001 to 2001-2002, to study the re- sponse of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.) to seeding methods and weed management. Criss- cross and unidirectional sowing resulted in significantly higher yield attributes, grain yield and net returns than broadcasting. Criss-cross sowing significantly reduced weed count and weed dry biomass than broadcasting. Test weight and protein content in grain were unaffected by seeding methods. Among the weed-control treatments, hand-weeding although recorded higher yield attributes, grain and straw yields but was found at par with those recorded under sulfosulfuron 33.3 g/ha and significantly higher than those recorded under isoproturon and 2,4-D. Net returns recorded among the weed-control treatments did not differ significantly. However, it was higher in isoproturon followed by sulfosulfuron, hand-weeding and 2,4-D. Weed-control treatments also recorded higher protein content weedy check.

References

Gogoi, A.K. and Kalita, H. 1995. Effect of seeding method and her-

bicide on weeds and growth of wheat. Indian Journal of

Agronomy 4 (2) :209-2 1 1. Gupta,U.K., Malik, R.K., Balyan, R.S. and Bhan, V.M. 1990. Effect

of growth stages of wild oat on the efficiency of urea herbi-

Harvest index Protein content Net return

w> in grain (%) (Rslha) 2000-2001-2000-2001-2000-2001-2001 2002 2001 2002 2001 2002

cide applied post-emergence. Research Journal, Hatyana Ag- ricultural University 20 :57-65.

Jhadhao, S.L. and Nalamwar, R.V. 1993. Response of wheat (Triti- cum aestivum L.) genotypes to planting method and manual weeding. Indian Journal ofAgronomy 38 (3) :382-385.

Malik, R.K., Yadav, A., Banga, R.S. and Singh, S. 2000. Zero-Till wheat sowing and alternate herbicides against Phalaris minor in rice-wheat cropping system. Indian Journal of Weed Sci- ence 32 (3,4) :220-222.

Sharma, B.D., Nanwal, R.K. and Panwar, R.S. 1999. Evaluation of herbicides for weed control in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Indian Journal of Weedscience 31 (1,2) :99-1 00.

Singh, R.D. and Ghosh, A.K. 1992. Evaluation of herbicides for control of wild oat (Avena ludoviciana) in wheat (Trilicunz species). Indian JournalofAgronomy 37(2) :327-33 I.

Tiwari, R.B. and Parihar, S.S. 1993. Weed management studies in wheat. Indian Journal of Weed Science 25(3,4) :90-9 1.

Walia, U.S., Brar, L.S. and Dhaliwal, B.K. 1997. ~esistance td isoproturon in Phalaris minor Retz. in Punjab. Plant Pro- tection Quarterly 12 : 138-140.

Downloads

Published

2001-10-10

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

I.B. PANBEY, & KULBEEP KUMAR. (2001). Response of wheat (Triticum aestivtm) to seeding methods and weed management. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 50(1), 48-51. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v50i1.5059