Biological and economical feasibility of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) + Indian mus- tard (Brassicajuncea) cropping systems under varying levels of phosphorus

Authors

  • H.N.TRIPATHI
  • SUBASH CHAND
  • A.K. TRIPATHI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v50i1.5054

Keywords:

Intercropping, Chickpea; lndian mustard, Chickpea-equivalent yield, Economic feasibility

Abstract

A study was undertaken by introducing lndian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. & Cosson] as an inter- crop with chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in 2 row proportions, viz. 6:2 and 8:2, fertilized with 0, 30, 60 and 90 kg P,O,/ha during the winter season of 1998-99 and 1999-2000, to assess the biological and economical feasibil- ity of chickpea + lndian mustard in association under varying levels of phosphorus. Intercropping systems re- duced the values of yield attributes and seed yield of chickpea, while reverse was true in case of lndian mustard than sole cropping of chickpea and lndian mustard respectively. Both intercropping systems recorded signifi- cantly higher chickpea-equivalent yield, net monetary returns and benefit : cost ratio than its sole cropping. Among the intercropping systems, 8:2 row ratio proved most efficient and profitable system resulting in maximum chickpea-equivalent yield (24.31 qlha), net monetary returns (Rs 17,10I/ha), benefit : cost ratio (2:11) and land- equivalent ratio (1.19). Both chickpea and lndian mustard in sole and intercropping systems responded favourably up to 60 kg P,O$ha only for yield attributes, yield and net monetary returns over no phosphorus and 30 kg P,O$ha. The interaction effects of the factors showed that mean chickpea equivalents responded to P ap- plication up to 60 kg/ha in sole stands and up to 90 kg P,O,/ha in intercropping systems.

References

Bhari, N.R., Siaq, S.K. and Mann, P.S. 2000. Response of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) to nitrogen and phosphorus on Torripsammends of north-western Rajasthan. Indian Journal ofAgronorny 45 (4) :746-75 1.

Donald, C.M. 1963. Competition among crop and pasture plants. Advances in Agronomy 15 :1-1 18.

Enania, A.R. and Vyas, A.K. 1995. To study the response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to phosphorus and zinc fertili- zation in calcareous soil of Rajasthan. Indian Journal of Agronomy 40 (4) :704-706.

Prasad, K., Rathi, K.S. and Ram, H. 2000. Studies on intercropping of mustard with chickpea varieties. Crop Research 19 (1) : 144-145.

Sarkar, R.K., Shit, D. and Chakraborty, A. 1995. Response of chickpea to levels of phosphorus in rainfed upland of Chhotanagpur plateau. Indian Journal ofAgronomy 40 (2) : 309-3 11.

Sarkar, R.K., Shit, D. and Maitra, S. 2000. Competition functions, productivity and economics of chickpea (Cicer arietinutn)- based intercropping system under rainfed conditions of Bihar plateau. Indian Journal ofAgronomy 45(4) :68 1-686.

Thakur, N.S., Pannase, S.K. and Sharma, R.S. 2000. Production po- tential of gram (Cicer arietinurn)-based intercropping system under rainfed condition. Indian Journal ofAgronotny 45(3) : 534-539.

Willey, R.W. 1979. Intercropping: its importance and research needs.

I. Competition and yield advantage. Field Crop Abstracts

Downloads

Published

2001-10-10

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

H.N.TRIPATHI, SUBASH CHAND, & A.K. TRIPATHI. (2001). Biological and economical feasibility of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) + Indian mus- tard (Brassicajuncea) cropping systems under varying levels of phosphorus. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 50(1), 31-34. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v50i1.5054