Production potential of spring sugarcane as influenced by intercropping of dual- purpose legumes under tarai conditions of Uttarakhand
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v51i4.5027Keywords:
Sugarcane, Legume intercropping, NPK levels, Yield, EconomicsAbstract
A field experiment was conducted during 2000-02 at the Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, to study the effect of dual-purpose legume intercropping with spring sugarcane under different NPK levels. All intercrops, except Sesbania reduced the cane yield significantly. The reduction in cane yield was 14.0, 8.9 and 11.4% with cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.], mungbean (Vigna radiata) and urdbean (Vigna mungo) intercropping respectively. Sugarcane intercropped with Sesbania (GM) yielded similar to that of sole sugarcane. Different fertility levels did not show significant effect on cane yield. Sugarcane + cow- pea gave 17.2, 15.8, 19.0 and 26.5% higher mean cane-equivalent yield (118.4 tonneslha) than sole sugarcane, sugarcane + mungbean, sugarcane + urdbean and sugarcane + Sesbania intercropping respectively. A dose of 100% of recommended NPK resulted in 5.0% higher cane-equivalent yield than 75% dose and was on a par with 125% of NPK dose. Sugarcane + cowpea also gave the highest net return of Rs 57,772 compared to Rs 41,449 with urdbean and Rs 48,330 with sole sugarcane. Respective benefit : cost raio was 2.06, 1.78 and 2.01. A dose of 125% of the recommended NPK gave highest monetary return and benefit : cost ratio with maintaining the residual soil-fertility status after harvest of sugarcane.References
yield and economics (Table 2). Cane-equivalent yield and Bezbaruah, R. and Thakuria, K. 1996. Production potential of te- returnsha exhibited an increasing trend with increasing osinte and cowpea in mixed cropping system under rainfed levels of NPK up to the highest levels. A dose of 125% of conditions. Forage Research 22(1) :55-58.
Islam, S.A., Hossain, A.H. M.D., Sikka, L.C. and Midmore, D.J.
recommended NPK resulted in 7.0 tonnesrha more cane-
Agronomic management of potatolsugarcane inter-
equivalent yield than 75% dose. Such increase in cane-
cropping and its economic implications. Field Crops Re-
equivalent yield might be owing to under higher fertility
search 25 (1-2) :11 1-122.
condition, sugarcane compensate the shading effect in
Panwar, B. S., Singh, B.V. and Sharma, J.C. 1990. Feasibility of inter- respect of the good yield of the intercrops. Similar opinion cropping in autumn planted sugarcane. Indian Sugar was also given by Singh et al. (2002). 39(10) :75 1-756. When fertilized with 125% of recommended dose, sug- Raju, M.S., Srinivas, A. and Raju, V. 1997. Effect of N and legume intercropping on forage yield, crude protein and NPK up-
arcane crop removed highest amount of N (192.2 kg/ha),
take in forage maize (Zea mays L.). Forage Research
P (18.0'kg/ha) and K (298 kgha) which were significantly
(1-2) :59-63.
higher by 11.0, 27.7 and 8.0% over 75% recommended
Singh, J.P., Singh, M., Gangwar, K.S., Singh, Prem. andpathak, J.N.
NPK dose. Residual soil fertility followed the same trend
Economic security in sugarcane production through as that of nutrient uptake. These results are in close con- intercropping. Indian Journal cf Sugarcane Technology
formity with those of Raju et al. (1997). 17(1-2) :47-49.
