Effect of phosphorus, irrigation and Rhizobium on productivity, water use and nutrient uptake in fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum)

Authors

  • S.R. BHUNIA
  • R.P.S. CHAUHAN
  • B.S.YADAV
  • A.S. BHATl

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v51i3.5018

Keywords:

Fenugreek, Phosphorus, Irrigation, Rhizobium, Yield, Nutrient uptake

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during winter season of 2001-2004 for consecutive 3 years at Sriganganagar in Rajasthan to study the effect of phosphorus, irrigation and Rhizobiurn inoculation on seed, economics, water use and nutrient uptake of fenugreek (Trigonella foneurn-graecurn L.). Application of 40 kg P,O$ha significantly increased the yield attributes, viz. branchestplant, podstplant, pod length, seedstpod and test weight and finally the yield (8.08 qtha) over 20 kg P,O,. Phosphorus @ 40 kg P,O,/ha gave the highest mean benefit : cost ratio (1.47) in comparison with 20 (1.38) and 60 kg P,O,/ha (1.42). The highest P-use efficiency (35.95 kgtkg P,O,) was recorded at 20 kg P,O$ha, and further increase in P decreased the P-use efficiency. An increase m P level, increased the consumptive use but had no effect on water-use efficiency. Highest level of P,O, led to greater ex- traction of moisture from lower depth of rhizosphere. Application of P increased the N, P and K uptake up to 40 kg P,O,/ha. IW:CPE ratio of 0.8 significantly increased the yield (10.20 qtha), benefit : cost ratio (1.81), consump- tive water use (291.9 mn?) and nutrient uptake compared to IW : CPE ratio of 0.4 and 0.6. Higher yield attributes as well as higher seed (8.14 qtha) and stover yields (17.36 qtha) were recorded with Rhizobiurn inoculation than with uninoculated crop. Higher water use (244.8 mm), water-use efficiency (3.2 kgtha-mm) and nutrient uptake (N 31.6, P 5.5 and K 37.9 kgtha) were also recorded with the inoculated crop.

References

fixed more atmospheric nitrogen, which was used by the crop. Higher harvest index and benefit : cost ratio were Bhati, D.S. 1993. Effect of imgation and phosphorus on seed yi Id

and yield attributes of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-

also given by Rhizobium inoculated crop (Table 1). Higher

graecum). Indian Journal of Agronomy 38(3) :449-452.

water-use efficiency (3.3 kglha-mm) was also recorded

Chaudhary, G.R. 1999. Response of fenugreek (Trigonella foenu~n-

when the crop was inoculated with Rhizobium than

graecum) to N, P and Rhizobium inoculation. Indian Jour-

uninoculated crop. Rlzizobium inoculation had favourable

nal of Agronomy 44(2) :424-426. effects on nutrient uptake, and higher amount of N, P and

Khiriya, K.D. and Singh, B.P. 2003. Effect of phosphorus and farm' K were taken up by the crop when inoculated with Rlzizo-yard manure on yield attributes and nitrogen, phosphorus bium than by the uninoculated crops (Table 2). Rhizobium and potassium uptake of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum- graecum). Indian Journal of Agronomy 48 (1) : 62-65.

inoculation also recorded higher phosphorus-use effi- Shivran, P.L., Chaudhary, G.R., Gora, D.R. and Shivran, A.C. 1995.

ciency (20.34 kgkg P20,/ha). Higher nitrogen availability

Response of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) to ni-

in plant through Rhizobium inoculation might have in-

trogen and Rhizobium. Indian Journal of Agronomy 40(2) :

creased the uptake of all other nutrients, which in turn

-72 1. helped the crop for better performance in respect to phos-

Solaiappan, U. and Ramial, S. 1990. Effect of seed treatment, soil phorus use efficiency, consumptive water use and water- and foliar application of N and P on yield and yield at- use efficiency. tributes of pigeonpea grown under rainfed conditions. Indian

Fenugreek gave optimum yield with irrigation level of Jo~~rnal

of Agronomy 35(3) : 234-237.

Downloads

Published

2001-10-10

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

S.R. BHUNIA, R.P.S. CHAUHAN, B.S.YADAV, & A.S. BHATl. (2001). Effect of phosphorus, irrigation and Rhizobium on productivity, water use and nutrient uptake in fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 51(3), 239-241. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v51i3.5018