Productivity, economics, energetics and soil properties of vegetables-based relay intercropping systems

Authors

  • VED PRAKASH
  • NARENDRA KUMAR
  • RANJAN BHATTACHARIYYA
  • M. KUMAR
  • A.K. SRIVASTVA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v52i4.4943

Keywords:

Cultivated land-utilization index, Land-use efficiency, NW Himalayas, Production efficiency, Relay intercropping, Vegetables

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2002-03 and 2003-04 at Almora to find out the most productive and remunerative relay intercropping of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. nom. cons.) or french bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in maize (Zea mays L.), garden pea (Pisum sativum L.var. arvense poir.) in tomato or french bean, and french bean in garden pea. Results showed that relay intercropping of maize (green cobs) + tomato + garden pea + french bean, and maize (green cobs) + french bean + garden pea + french bean proved significantly superior in terms of maize grain-equivalent yield (71.3 and 51.5 t/ha), and net returns (Rs 2,39,558 and Rs 1,52,624/ha) than maize (green cobs) - garden pea (1 8.8 t/ha and Rs 48,02O/ha) and french bean - garden pea (30.7 t/ha, and Rs 94,0211ha) sequential cropping. Also, maize (green cobs) + tomato + garden pea + french bean recorded signifi- cantly highest production efficiency (195.4 kgldaylha) and economic efficiency (Rs 656/ha/day), system energy output (1 0,83,760 MJ/ha), system net energy return (1 0,40,856 MJIha) and system energy-use efficiency (2,852 MJIhdday). The lowest maize grain equivalent yield (18.8 t/ha), net returns (Rs 48,02O/ha), production efficiency (51.5 kgldaylha) and economic efficiency (Rs 132lhdday) were recorded under maize (green cobs) - garden pea sequential cropping. Physico-chemical properties of the soil improved significantly due to relay intercropping sys- tems over maize (green cobs) - garden pea sequence. Relay intercropping of maize (green cobs) + tomato + gar- den pea + french bean proved the best in terms of total production and monetary returns.

References

Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D. and Smith, M. 1998. Crop Evapotranspiration-Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirement. Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.

Jha, G., Singh, D.P. and Thakur, R.B. 2000. Production potential of maize (Zea mays) + potato (Solanum tuberosum) intercrop-ping as influenced by fertilizer and potato genotypes. Indian Journal of Agronomy 45(1): 59-63.

Keshta, M.M., El-Ahmar, B. and El-Shimy, A.A. 2000. Studies on sunflower-tomato relay cropping. Egyptian Journal of Agri- cultural Research 78(1): 173-183.

Padhi, A.K. 2001. Effect of vegetables intercropping on productiv- ity, economics and energetics of maize (Zea mays). Indian Journal of Agronomy 46 (2): 204-210.

Prakash, V., Pandey, A.K., Srivastva, A.K. and Gupta, H.S. 2004. Relay intercropping of hybrid tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)in maize (Zea mays) under mid-hill condition of north-western Himalayas. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 74(8): 405408.

Sharma, S.N., Prasad, R. and Singh, S. 1993. Relative productivity and economics of mono, sequential and relay cropping sys- tems of potato (Solanum tuberosum) and wheat (Triticum aestivum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 63(5):

-264. Singh, R.P., Das, S.K., Bhasakara Rao, U.M. and Narayan Reddy,

M. 1990. Towards Sustainable Dryland Agricultural Prac- tices. CRIDA, Hyderbad.

Downloads

Published

2001-10-10

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

VED PRAKASH, NARENDRA KUMAR, RANJAN BHATTACHARIYYA, M. KUMAR, & A.K. SRIVASTVA. (2001). Productivity, economics, energetics and soil properties of vegetables-based relay intercropping systems. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 52(4), 300-304. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v52i4.4943