Impact of row ratio and nutrient management on performance of clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) + sesame (Sesamum indicum) intercropping system
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v53i4.4874Keywords:
Clusterbean, Farmyard manure, Fertility, Intercropping, SesameAbstract
A field experiment was conducted during rainy ( khar if) season of 2005 to 2007 at Kukma, Bhuj, (Gujarat) in sandy soil to study the effect of row ratio and nutrient management on sustainability of clusterbean [ Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.] + sesame ( Sesamum indicum L.) intercropping system under arid condition. Treatments comprised of 15 combinations of cropping systems, viz. sole clusterbean, sole sesame, clusterbean + sesame in 1:2, 1:1 and 2:1 row proportions and nutrient management, viz. the control, 40 kg N/ha and 20 kg N + 5 t FYM/ha. Intercropping declined the seed yield of clusterbean by 30% compared to sole crop (mean of 3 years 0.71 t/ha). However, clusterbean-equivalent yield (0.92 t/ ha), net returns (Rs 6,251/ ha) and benefit : cost (B : C) ratio (1.67) were higher with clusterbean + sesame (2 : 1) intercropping system over the corresponding values of 0.71, 3,572 and 1.41 in sole clusterbean. Irrespective of the cropping system, application of 20 kg N + 5 t FYM/ha recorded significantly higher clusterbean-equivalent yield (1.036 t/ha), net monetary returns (Rs 7,793/ha) and B: C ratio (1.79) than of 40 kg N/ha alone and the absolute control. Addition of 5 t FYM/ha along with 20 kg N/ha gave 8.5 and 9.8% higher uptake of N than of 40 kg N/ha and the control respectively. The sustainable yield index (SYI) and sustainable value index (SVI) were higher with clusterbean + sesame under 2:1 row ratio (0.74, 0.76), and the highest SYI (0.81) and SVI (0.82) indices were observed under the application of 20 kg N/ha with 5 t FYM/ha. Clusterbean + sesame (2:1) with application of 20 kg N + 5 t FYM/ha was more advantageous and saved 50% rec- ommended dose of N fertilizer.References
Ahlawat, I.P.S., Gangaiah, B. and Singh, Ompal. 2005. Production potential of chickpea (Cicer arietinum)based intercropping systems under irrigated conditions. Indian Journal of Agronomy 50(1): 2730.
Bastia, D.K., Garnayak, L.M. and Barik, T. 2008. Diversification of rice (Oryza sativa) based cropping systems for higher productivity, resource use efficiency and economics. Indian Journal of Agronomy 53(1): 2226.
Faroda, A.S., Joshi, N.L, Singh, Raj. and Sexena, Anurag. 2007. Resource management for sustainable crop production in arid zone: a review. Indian Journal of Agronomy 52(3): 181
Imayavaramban, V., Thanunathan, K., Singhravel, R. and Manikam,
G. 2002. Studies on the influence of integrated nutrient management on growth, yield parameters and seed yield of sesame. Crop Research, Hisar 24(2): 309313.
Kumar, S. 2002. Effect of planting pattern and fertilizer management on castor-based intercropping system. Indian Journal of Agronomy 47(3): 355360.
Mankotia, B.S. 2007. Effect of fertilizer application with farmyard manure and in-situ green manures in standing rice (Oryza sativa)wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 77(8): 512515.
Mishra, J.P., Ali, Masood and Arya, R.L. 2001. Genotypic compatibility in relation to row ratio in the intercropping of linseed and gram under rainfed conditions. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 71(6): 359362.
Nambiar, K.K.M. 1994. Soil fertility and crop productivity under long-term fertilizer use in India. ICAR, New Delhi.
Padhi, A.K. and Panigrahi, R.K. 2006. Effect of intercropping and crop geometry on productivity, economics, energetics and soil-fertility status of maize (Zea mays)-based intercropping systems. Indian Journal of Agronomy 51(3): 174177.
Sarkar, R.K., Goswami, S. and Pal, P.K. 2003. Production potential and economic feasibility sunflower (Helianthus annuus) and pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) intercropping system on rainfed upland condition. Indian Journal of Agronomy 40(4): 263 266
Singh, R. 2002. Effect of integrated nutrient management in cluster bean-wheat cropping system under western Rajasthan condition. Indian Journal of Agronomy 47(1): 4145.
Singh, Raj. and Khan, M.A. 2003. Response of clusterbean varieties to fertility levels and cropping systems under arid conditions. In: Advances in Arid Legume Research, pp. 225228. Henry, A., Kumar, D. and Singh, N.B. (Eds). Scientific Publishers, and Indian Society of Arid Legumes, Jodhpur.
Singh, R.P., Das, S.K., Bhaskar Rao, V.M. and Narayan Reddy, M. 1990. Towards Sustainable Dryland Agricultural Practices, pp.58. Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad.
Willey, R.W. 1979. Intercropping: its importance and research needs. Part 1. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crops Abstracts 32(1): 110.




