Productivity, profitability and quality of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) plant- ratoon system in relation to planting methods and seeding rate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v53i3.4859Keywords:
Pit, Planting, Ratoon, Seed, Sugarcane, System, TrenchAbstract
Field studies were conducted at Ladhowal, on sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) plant (2004-05 and 2005-06) and ratoon (2005-06 and 2006-07) crops to work out suitable combination of planting method and seed rate for sugar- cane plant-ratoon system. Three planting methods, viz. flat (conventional planting in 15 cm deep furrows spaced 75 cm apart), trench (planting in paired rows on both sides of trench 30 cm wide, 30 cm deep, spaced 120 cm apart), pit (60 cm dia meter, 45 cm deep, spaced 120 cm apart) along with three seeding rates, viz. 4.0 Uha (trans- planted), 8.0 t/ha (sett planting, recommended) and 16.0 t/ha (sett planting), were evaluated in split-plot design. Trench planting recorded the highest number of shoots and millable canes, whereas pit planting the highest single- cane weight. The planting method did not influence the cane and sugar yields in plant crop, but the ratoon-crop yield in trench was significantly higher than by conventional method, but was on a par with that of pit method. Use of 16.0 tlha seed significantly increased the cane and sugar yields of plant crop than both the lower seed rates, whereas the ratoon-crop yield did not vary among seed rates. The transplanted crop gave crop yield on a par with that of recommended seed. Trench planting showed significantly higher pol reading than pit method, in plant crop and, in ratoon crop 16 Uha seed gave significantly higher pol, brix and commercial cane sugar content than trans- planted crop. Trench planting using 8.0 Uha seed recorded the highest total net returns (Rs 73,800lha) as well as benefit: cost ratio (0.920) from sugarcane plant-ratoon system. Trench transplanting also gave higher economic re- turns than conventional planting with recommended seed.References
Bajelan, B. and Nazir, N.S. 1993. Effect of fertility variation and planting pattern on growth, yield and quality of sugarcane. International Journal of Tropical Agriculture 11: 249-254.
Bell, M.J. and Garside, A.L. 2005. Shoot and stalk dynamics and the yield of sugarcane crops in tropical and subtropical
Seed rate (tha)
Ratoon crop Plant -ratoon system
0 8.0 16.0 4.0 8.0 16.0
Queensland, Australia. Field Crops Research 92: 23 1-248.
Garside, A.L., Bell, M.J., Berthelsen, J.E. and Halpin, N.V. 2002. Effect of fumigation, density and row spacing on the growth and yield of sugarcane in two diverse environments. Pro-ceedings of Australian Society of Sugarcane Technologists
: 135-144. Singles, A., Smit, M.A., Redshaw, K.A. and Donaldson, R.A. 2005.
The effect of crop start date, crop class and cultivar on sug-
arcane canopy development and radiation interception. Field
Crops Research 92: 249-260.
Yadav, R.L. 2004. Enhancing efficiency of fertilizer N use in sugar- cane by ring-pit method of planting. Sugar Technology 6(3): 169-171.
Yadav, R.L. and Kumar, R. 2005. On farm comparison of ring- pit and conventional flat planting methods for yield and quality of sugarcane in northwest India. Indian Journal of Agricul- tural Sciences 75: 605-607.
Yadav, R.L., Kumar, R. and Verma, R.S. 1990. Effect of planting techniques and planting density on yield of late planted sug- arcane in North Central India. Experimental Agriculture 27: 281-286.
Yadav, R.L., Singh, R.V., Singh, R. and Srivastava, V.K. 1997. Ef- fect of planting geometry and fertilizer nitrogen on nitrate leaching, nitrogen use efficiency and sugarcane yield. Tropi-cal Agriculture 74: 115-120.
Bajelan, B. and Nazir, N.S. 1993. Effect of fertility variation and planting pattern on growth, yield and quality of sugarcane. International Journal of Tropical Agriculture 11: 249-254.
Bell, M.J. and Garside, A.L. 2005. Shoot and stalk dynamics and the yield of sugarcane crops in tropical and subtropical
Seed rate (tha)
Ratoon crop Plant -ratoon system
0 8.0 16.0 4.0 8.0 16.0
Queensland, Australia. Field Crops Research 92: 23 1-248.
Garside, A.L., Bell, M.J., Berthelsen, J.E. and Halpin, N.V. 2002. Effect of fumigation, density and row spacing on the growth and yield of sugarcane in two diverse environments. Pro-ceedings of Australian Society of Sugarcane Technologists
: 135-144. Singles, A., Smit, M.A., Redshaw, K.A. and Donaldson, R.A. 2005.
The effect of crop start date, crop class and cultivar on sug-
arcane canopy development and radiation interception. Field
Crops Research 92: 249-260.
Yadav, R.L. 2004. Enhancing efficiency of fertilizer N use in sugar- cane by ring-pit method of planting. Sugar Technology 6(3): 169-171.
Yadav, R.L. and Kumar, R. 2005. On farm comparison of ring- pit and conventional flat planting methods for yield and quality of sugarcane in northwest India. Indian Journal of Agricul- tural Sciences 75: 605-607.
Yadav, R.L., Kumar, R. and Verma, R.S. 1990. Effect of planting techniques and planting density on yield of late planted sug- arcane in North Central India. Experimental Agriculture 27: 281-286.
Yadav, R.L., Singh, R.V., Singh, R. and Srivastava, V.K. 1997. Ef- fect of planting geometry and fertilizer nitrogen on nitrate leaching, nitrogen use efficiency and sugarcane yield. Tropi-cal Agriculture 74: 115-120.




