Effect of intercropping in sugarcane (Saccharurn complex hybrid) on productivity of plant cane - ratoon system

Authors

  • A.K. SINGH
  • MENHl LAL
  • ARCHNA SUMAN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v53i2.4849

Keywords:

Autumn sugarcane, B C ratio, Bulk density, Cane-equivalent yield, Commercial cane sugar, Infiltration rate, Net returns, Ratoon

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Lucknow during 2002-03 and 2003-04 to assess the production potential and economic viability of autumn-planted sugarcanefibased intercropping systems, viz. sugarcane sole and sug- arcane intercropped with lentil (Lens esculentus), rajmash (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), Indian mustard (Brassica compestris), rapeseed (Brassica sp.) and maize (Zea mays L.) for cobs at 2 row spacings of 90 and 75 cm. The intercropping with rajmash had no adverse effect on the number of millable canes (1 17.6 thousandlha), cane length (21 3 cm) and cane yield (83.4 t/ha) compared with sole cane. Intercropping of rajmash and maize for green cobs resulted in highest net profit (Rs 89,883 and 83,815lha) and benefit : cost ratio (B : C) (2.53 and 2.34) com- pared with sole sugarcane (Rs 50,199 /ha). Ratoon sugarcane intercropped with lentil gave higher cane yield (64.2 t/ha) than that from sugarcane sole. Besides, there was improvement in the physico-chemical properties of the soil under sugarcane + lentil intercropping system with lower bulk density (1.26 g/cm3) and higher infiltration rate (4.75 mmlhr) compared with sole sugarcane. Inclusion of short-duration intercrops like rajmash, and maize for green cobs in autumn-planted sugarcane improved the productivity and profitability, and lentil intercropping im- proved the soil health under plantfiratoon system.

References

IISR, Lucknow. 2007. Annual Report 2006-07, Indian Institute of

Sugarcane Research, Lucknow. Meade, G.P. and Chen, J.C.P. 1977. Cane Sugar Hundbook, edn.10,

pp. 882-885. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Lal, Menhi and Singh, A.K. 2004. Technology package for sugar- (g/cm3)

SINGH ETAL. [Vol. 53, No. 2

Table 4. Effect of cropping system on physico-chemical properties of soils

Cropping system After harvest of plant crop After harvest of ratoon cane

(2002-03) (2003-04)

Bulk density Infiltration rate Available N Bulk density Infiltration Available N

(-1(kgw (g/cm3) rate (kgw

Sugarcane (sole) 1.36 4.00 209.8 1.30 4.10 225.6 Sugarcane + lentil 1.26 4.75 246.9 1.28 4.25 238.4 Sugarcane + rajmash 1.28 4.50 231.9 1.30 4.15 232.2 Sugarcane + Indian mustard 1.34 3.75 190.5 1.34 3.75 220.2 Sugarcane + rapeseed 1.39 3.75 142.5 1.34 3.80 212.8 Sugarcane + maize 1.36 4.25 204.4 1.36 3.75 220.4 Initial value 1.35 4.00 196.3 1.36 4.00 209.8

cane based intercropping systems. Indian Institute of Sugar- sugar genotypes of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) hybrids. cane Research, Lucknow. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 76(2): Parsons, M.J. 2004. Successful intercropping of sugarcane. Sugar-Sultani, M.I., Gill, MA., Anwar, M.M. and Athar, M. 2007. Evalu-cane International 22(1): 14-28. ation of soil physical properties as influenced by various

Singh, A.K., Lal, M. and Srivastava, T.K. 2005. Enhancing produc- green manuring legumes and phosphorus fertilization under tivity and sustainability of sugarcane plant-ratoon system rainfed conditions. Intemtional Journal of Environmental through planting geometry, dual-purpose legume intercrop- Science and Technology 4(1): 109-1 18. ping and nitrogen nutrition. Indian Journal of Agronomy 50 Surnan, A., Lal, Menhi, Singh, A.K. and Gaur, A. 2006. Microbial (4): 285-288. biomass turnover in Indian sub-tropical soils under different

Singh, A.K., Lal, Menhi and Prasad, S.R. 2006. Effect of row spac- sugarcane intercropping systems. Agronomy Journal 98: ing and nitrogen on ratoonability of early maturing high 698-704.

Downloads

Published

2001-10-10

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

A.K. SINGH, MENHl LAL, & ARCHNA SUMAN. (2001). Effect of intercropping in sugarcane (Saccharurn complex hybrid) on productivity of plant cane - ratoon system. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 53(2), 140-144. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v53i2.4849