Rainwater conservation and yield of sorghum (Sorghum biclor) as influenced by tillage and cover management practices in red soils

Authors

  • DEV NARAYAN
  • B. LAL

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v54i4.4820

Keywords:

Luvisols, Mulch, Rainwater, Runoff, Soil, Sorghum, Sunnhemp

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during kharifof 2002 to 2003 at 2% slope in red soils at Datia, Madhya Pradesh to evolve a suitable tillage and surface mulching practice for higher rainwater conservation for aug- menting the crop growth and yield of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Monech.] under rainfed conditions. Nine treatment combinations [T,, zero tillage (no crop); T,, T, + sorghum; T,, T , in situ surface mulching; T,, traditional + tillage (no crop); T,, T , sorghum; T,, T , in situ surface mulching; T,, improved tillage (no crop); T,, T , sor- + + + ghum and T,, T , in situ surface mulching] were evaluated under randomized block design with 3 replications. + Maximum infiltration rate (5.6 cmlhr), pore space (47.9%), water holding capacity (37.1 cm of 0-30 cm soil layer) and water stable aggregates (48.1 1 and 49.92 of 0-15 and 15-30 cm soil layer, respectively) and lowest bulk density (1.38 Mg/m3) were recorded under improved tillage + sorghum + in situ surface mulching (T,). Bulk den- sity was maximum (1.54 Mg/m3) under zero tillage (T,). Owing to higher rainwater conservation (78.9% mean of 2 years) growth, yield attributes and yield of sorghum increased significantly under increasing tillage depths and in situ surface mulching. Thus highest grain (3.31 tlha) and stover (9.98 tlha) yield and moisture use efficiency (7.84 kglha-mm) were recorded under T,. The results indicated that improved tillage coupled with in situ surface mulch- ing of sunnhemp was helpful for higher rain water conservation and increasing the yield of sorghum under rainfed conditions in red soils under semi - arid conditions of Madhya Pradesh.

References

Abrol, I.P. and Sangar, S. 2006. Sustaining Indian agriculture -con- servation agriculture the way forward. Current Science 91(8): 1020-1025.

Bhardwaj, S.P. and Sindhwal, N.S. 1998. Zero tillage and weed mulch for erosion control on sloping farm land in Doon Val- ley. Indian Journal of Soil Conservation 26: 81-85.

Bertrand, A.R. 1965. Rate of water intake in field. In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part- I. (Black, C. A. Ed.) pp. 374-390. Ameri- can Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin.

Black, C.A. 1965. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 11.American So- ciety of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Gurumurthy, P. and Rao, M.S. 2006. Effect of tillage and inigation regimes on soil physical properties and performance of sun- flower in rice fallow 1. Soil physical properties and crop establishment. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 54(1): 12-17.

Gummurthy,P. and Rao, M.S. 2006a. Effect of tillage and imgation regimes on soil physical properties and performance of sun- flower in rice fallows. 11.Water use and crop yield. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 54(1): 18-23.

Pandey, I.B., Sharrna, S.L., Tiwari, S. and Misra, S.S. 2005. Eco- nomics of tillage and weed management system for wheat (Triticum aestivum) after lowland rice (Oryza sativa). Indian Journal of Agronomy 50(1): 44-47.

Singh, R., Prasad, S. N., Singh, K. D. and Samra, J. S. 1977. Run- off, Soil and Nutrient losses in Vertisols of South Eastern Rajasthan. Bulletin No. T-34lK-4, Central Soil and Water Conservation Research and Training Institute, Research Cen- tre, Kota, Rajasthan.

Downloads

Published

2001-10-10

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

DEV NARAYAN, & B. LAL. (2001). Rainwater conservation and yield of sorghum (Sorghum biclor) as influenced by tillage and cover management practices in red soils. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 54(4), 438-443. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v54i4.4820