Productivity and economics of rice (Oryza sativa) in system of rice intensification in North-Western Himalayas

Authors

  • J. SHEKHAR
  • B. S. MANKOTlA
  • S.P. DEV

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v54i4.4817

Keywords:

Crop management, Economics, Intensification, Productivity, Rice

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Malan during kharif 2006 and 2007 to evaluate the productivity and prof- itability of rice under system of rice intensification (SRI) and integrated crop management (ICM). The SRI in- volved transplanting of 10-12 days old single seedlinglhill at 25 cm x 25 cm; ICM involved transplanting of 15-18 days old 1-2 seedlingslhill at 20 cm x 20 cm spacing and were compared with conventional transplanting (CT) of 4 weeks old 2-3 seedlingslhill at 20 cm x 10 cm spacing. The treatments (CT, SRI, ICM) were tested in 2 sets,l with same date of nursery sowing (consequently with different transplanting dates) and another with same date of transplanting (with different dates of nursery sowing). The SRI and ICM methods outperformed CT under same date of nursery sowing. The plants under SRI and ICM were taller by 7.4 cm and 6.1 cm, respectively and ma- tured 7 days earlier compared to CT (124 days). More tillering at hill level compensated and thus effective tillers1 m2 in ICM (247) were at par with CT (244) but were less in SRI (203). Panicle weight (g) was significantly more in SRI (3.75) followed by ICM (3.01) and CT (2.85). On an average ICM (6.67 tlha; 14.5%) and SRI (6.43 ffha; 10.6%) produced significantly more grain yield compared to CT (5.81 tlha). NPK uptake was significantly more in ICM (98.9, 19.6, 96.8 kglha) followed by SRI and CT. On an average, ICM recorded significantly higher net return (Rs 40,9431ha) and benefit:cost ratio (2.04) followed by SRI (Rs 39,1201ha and 1.98). Under same date of nurs- ery transplanting, the number of effective tillers/m2 were significantly less under SRI (164) and ICM (214) and so the productivity and profitability in new methods was less. Thus, it is concluded that under mid hills of Himachal Pradesh, ICM was promising to increase the productivity and profitability of transplanted rice.

References

Balasubramanian, V., Rajendran, R., Ravi, V., Chellaiah, N., Castro, E., Chandrasekaran, B., Jayaraj, T. and Ramanathan, S. 2005. Integrated crop management for enhancing yield, fac- tor productivity and productivity in Asian rice farms. Inter-national Rice Commission Newsletter 54: 63-72.

Balasubramanian, V., Sie, M., Hijmans, R.J. and Otsuka, K. 2007. Increasing rice productiion in Sub-Saharan Africa: chal-lenges and opportunities. Advances in Agronomy 94: 55-

Linhua, Wu., ChunZan., Chen AliLiu., Ding YuYun and Liao ChuanShuang. 2006. Yield increasing mechanism of system of rice intensification (SRI) and its key techniques. Hybrid Rice 21(1): 42-43.

Makarim, A.K., Balasubramanian, V., Zaini, Z., Syamsiah, I., Diratmadja, I.G.P.A., Handoco, A,, Wardana, I.P. and Gani,

A. 2002. System of rice intensification (SRI): evaluation of seedling age and selected components in Indonesia. In: Pro-ceedings of International Workshop on Water-wise rice pro- duction. 8-1 1 April, 2002. Los Banos, Philippines. pp. 129-

McDonald, A.J., Hobbs, P.R. and Riha, S.J. 2006. Does the system of rice intensification out perform conventional best manage- ment? A synopsis of the empirical record. Field Crops Re- search 96(1): 31-36.

Rajendran, R., Balasubramanian, V., Ravi, V., Valliappan, K., Jayaraj,

T. and Ramanathan, S. 2004. Nursery technology for early production of robust rice seedlings to transplant under inte- grated crop management. International Rice Research Notes 29(2): 73-75.

Reddy, G.K., Yakadri, M., Mohammad, S. and Rao, P.C. 2006. Higher productivity of inputs with system of rice intensifi-

DECEMBER 20091 PRODUCTIVITY AND ECONOMICS IN SYSTEM OF RICE INTENSIFICATION (SRI)

cation. Journal ofRice Research l(2): 182-184.

Sharma, P.K. and Masand, S.S. 2008. Evaluation of system of rice intensification in a high rainfall area of North-western Himalay as. Oryza 45(3): 206-2 1 1.

Sharma, S.D. and Prasada Rao, U. (Eds.) 2004. Genetic Improve- ment of Rice Varieties of India, 551-579 pp. Today and To- morrows Printers and Publishers, New Delhi.

Sinha, S.K. and Talati, J. 2007. Productivity impacts of the system of rice intensification (SRI): a case study in West Bengal, India. Agricultural Water Management 87:55-60.

Uphoff, N. 2003. SRI -Higher yields with fewer external inputs? The system of rice intensification and potential contribu-

tions to agricultural sustainability. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability l(1): 38-50.

Vijayakumar, M., Ramesh, S., Prabhakaran, N.K., Subbian, P. and Chandrasekaran, B. 2006. Influence of system of rice inten- sification (SRI) practices on growth characters, days to flowering, growth analysis and labour productivity of rice. _ Asian Journal of Plant Science 5: 984-989.

~ija~akumar,M., Singh, S.D.S., Prabhakaran, N.K. and Thiyagarajan,T.M. 2004. Effect of SRI (System of Rice In- tensification) practices on the yield attributes yield and wa- ter pruductivity of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Acta Agronomica Hungarica 52(4): 399408.

Downloads

Published

2001-10-10

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

J. SHEKHAR, B. S. MANKOTlA, & S.P. DEV. (2001). Productivity and economics of rice (Oryza sativa) in system of rice intensification in North-Western Himalayas. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 54(4), 423-427. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v54i4.4817