Fodder productivity and economics of pearlmillet (Pennisetum typhoides) with legumes intercropping under various row proportions

Authors

  • R.P. SHARMA
  • K.R. RAMAN
  • A.K. SINGH

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v54i3.4807

Keywords:

Crude protein, Economics, Fodder crops, Intercropping, Legumes, Pearlmillet, Yield

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the summer seasons of 2007 and 2008 at Sabour to assess the pro- ductivity and economics of intercropping of forage pearlmillet [ Pennisetum typhoides (L.) R. Br. Emend & Stuntz.] with cowpea [ Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.], clusterbean [ Cyamposis tetragonaloba (L.) Taub.] and rice bean [ Vigna umbellata (Thumb) ohwi and ohashi] under 4 row proportions, viz., 1: 1, 1: 2, 2: 1 and 2: 2. Fodder yields of both the component crops were substantially reduced under intercropping system compared with their sole stands. Pooled analysis of 2 years showed that pearlmillet + cowpea (2: 2) recorded significantly higher total green (52.8 t/ha), dry fodder (13.24 t/ha), crude protein yield (1.36 t/ha), as well as net returns (Rs 24,060/ha) compared with the other treatments. The highest land-equivalent ratio (1.42), relative crowding coefficient (6.54) and lowest value of competitive ratio (1.29) also indicated superiority of pearlmillet + cowpea system. Among the component crops, pearlmillet was more competitive and aggressive to legume intercrops. However, maximum aggressivity index (0.55) and competitive ratio (3.42) were obtained with pearlmillet + clusterbean (1: 2). Thus, in- tercropping of pearlmillet and cowpea in 2: 2 row ratio may be adopted for higher fodder productivity, quality and profitability during summer.

References

Bezbaruah, R. and Thakuria, K. 1996. Production potential of teosinte and cowpea in mixed cropping system under rainfed condition. Forage Research 22(1): 5558.

Kumar, S., Rawat, C.R. and Melkania, N.P. 2005. Forage production potential and economics of maize (Zea mays) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) intercropping under rainfed conditions. Indian Journal of Agronomy 50(3): 184186.

Ram, S.N. and Singh, B. 2003. Physiological growth parameters, forage yield and nitrogen uptake of sorghum (Sorghum bi-color) as influenced with legume intercropping, harvesting time and nitrogen level. Indian Journal of Agronomy 48(1): 3841.

Sarkar, R.K. and Pal, P.K. 2004. Effect of intercropping rice (Oryza sativa) with groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) and pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) under different row combinations on rainfed uplands. Indian Journal of Agronomy 49(3): 147150.

Sharma, K.C. 2008. Fodder productivity and economics of multi-cut pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum) intercropped with clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba). Indian Journal of Agronomy 53(1): 5156.

Sharma, R.P., Singh, A.K., Poddar, B.K. and Raman, K.R. 2008. Forage production potential and economics of maize (Zea mays) with legume intercropping under various row proportions. Indian Journal of Agronomy 53(2): 121124.

Singh, B., Kumar, R., Dhukia, R.S. and Singh, B.P. 2005. Effect of intercropping on the yield of summer fodders. Forage Research 31(1): 5961.

Verma, S.S., Joshi, Y.P. and Saxena, S.C. 2005. Effect of row ratio of fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) intercropping system on productivity, competition functions and economics under rainfed condition of North India. Indian Journal of Agronomy 50(2): 123125.

Willey, R. W. 1979. Intercropping, its importance and research needs, competition and yield advantages. Field Crops Abstracts 32 (1): 110.

Downloads

Published

2001-10-10

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

R.P. SHARMA, K.R. RAMAN, & A.K. SINGH. (2001). Fodder productivity and economics of pearlmillet (Pennisetum typhoides) with legumes intercropping under various row proportions. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 54(3), 301-305. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v54i3.4807