Integrated farming system and agriculture sustainability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v54i2.4790Keywords:
Employment, Integrated farming system, Profitability, Resource management.Abstract
There are 115 million operational holdings in the country and about 80 % are marginal and small farmers. To fulfill the basic needs of house hold including food (cereal, pulses, oilseeds, milk, fruit, honey, meat, etc.), feed, fodder, fiber, etc. warrant an attention about Integrated Farming System (IFS). Undoubtedly, majority of the farm- ers are doing farming since long back but their main focus was individual components but not in a integrated manner. At the ICAR and State Agricultural Universities level, lot of efforts have been made aiming at increasing the productivity of different components of farming system like crop, dairy, livestock, poultry, piggery, goat keep- ing, duckery, apiculture, sericulture, horticulture, mushroom cultivation etc. individually but lacking in their inte- gration by following farming system approach. The integration is made in such a way that product of one com- ponent should be the input for other enterprises with high degree of complimentary effects on each other. The fodder fed to the cattle produces milk. The dung, urine and litter produce farmyard manure and energy used for crops and fish pond. The siltation of fish pond is utilized as manure to crops. The farmyard manure can substi- tute about 25% of recommended N P and K for crops, besides improving the physical and biological properties of soil. The fish pond water can be used by gravity method while there is breakdown in electricity supply. Oil- seeds provide nectar for honeybee, edible oils for human and oilseed-cake for animal feed. Integrated nutrient management can enhance the productivity of cereals by 0.5 to 1.0 t/ha. Processing of different products en- hances the value addition to the extent of 25 to 50% besides generating 50-75-man days/ family/ year of em- ployment. The fish pond embankment comprising 20-30% can be used for growing cucurbits and fruit trees which provide effective soil cover to checks the soil erosion and also make the system economically viable. The apportionment of farm land involving different enterprises, viz., cereal (40%), pulses (10%), oilseed (10%), horti- culture (15%), fishery (10%), livestock (10%), poultry/piggery/goatry (2%), storage, threshing floor, implement shed, vermicompost, straw storage and farm building etc. (3%) for the efficient use of resources available and to enhance the input use efficiency. The preliminary research investigations advocated the benefits of productiv- ity improvement by 30-50% depending upon the number and kind of enterprises and their management. The in- formation on farming system in a systematic way is presented here. The methodology is explained keeping in mind the work done so far to realize better productivity, profitability and sustainable production systems that would help to solve the fuel, feed and energy crisis, create more employment avenues, ensure regular income and encourage agricultural oriented industry.References
Anonymous, 1993. Guidelines for land use planning. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
Balusamy, M., Shanmugham, P.M. and Baskaran, R. 2003. Mixed farming an ideal farming. Intensive Agriculture 41 (1112): 2025.
Bhati, T.K. 1997. Integrated farming systems for sustainable agricultural on drylands. In: Sustainable Dryland Agriculture, CAZRI Publications, pp. 102105.
Bujarbarua, K.M., Satapathy, K.K. and Bhat, B.P. 2005. Alternate farming system : issue and opportunities in north eastern hills. In : Proceedings, National Symposium on Alternative Farming Systems held at PDCSR, Modipuram, 16-18 September, 2004, pp. 47-56.
Ganesan, G., Chinnasamy, K.N., Bala Subramanian, A. and Manickasundram, P. 1990. Studies on rice based farming system with duck cum fish culture in deltaic region of Thanjavur district, Tamilnadu. Farming Systems Newsletter 1(2) : 14.
Gill, M.S. 2004. Methodologies for farming system approach- A case study. In : Proceedings, National Symposium on Alternative Farming Systems held at PDCSR, Modipuram, 16-18 September, 2004, pp. 95-108.
Gill, M.S., Samra, J.S. and Singh, Gurbachan. 2005. Integrated farming system for realizing high productivity under shallow water-table conditions. Research bulletins, Department of Agronomy, PAU, Ludhiana, pp. 1-29.
Jayanthi, C., Rangasamy, A., Mythili, S., Balusamy, M., Chinnusamy, C. and Sankaran, N. 2001. Sustainable productivity and profitability to integrated farming systems in low land farms. In: Extended summaries, pp. 79-81. (Eds:
A.K. Singh, B. Gangwar, Pankaj and P.S. Pandey), National Symposium on Farming System Research on New Millennium, PDCSR, Modipuram.
Keir, B., Preston, T.R., Orskov, E.R., Nguyen Thi Duyen and Dinh van Binh. 1997. The nutritive value of tree leaves for goats. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volum 9, Number 3.
Khieu Borin and Preston, T.R. 1995. Conserving biodiversity and the environment and improving the well being of poor farmers in Cambodia by promoting pig feeding systems using the juice of the sugar palm tree (Borasus flabellifer). Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 7, Number
Korikanthimath, V.S. and Manjunath, B.L. 2005. Resource use efficiency in integrated farming systems. In : Proceeding of A symposium on Alternative Farming Systems: Enhanced income and employment generation options for small and marginal farmers PDCSR, Modipuram, pp. 109118.
Lal, R. and Miller, F.P. 1990. Sustainable farming for tropics. In: Sustainable agriculture: Issues and Prospective. Vol.1 (Ed.)
R.P. Singh, pp. 69-89, Indian Society of Agronomy, IARI, New Delhi.
Lasson de, A. and Dolberg, F. 1995. The casual effect of landholdings on livestock holdings. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, Germany, Frankfurt, Vol. 24. No. 4, pp.339-354.
Madalena, F.E. 1989. Cattle breeed resource utilization for dairy production in Brazil Revista Brazilena de Genetica, 12 (2) : pp 183-220 (Supplement).
Manjunath, B.L. 2002. 'Integrated farming systems for coastal region of Goa'. Ph.D. Thesis Department of Agronomy, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad.
Manjunath, B.L. and Itnal, C.J. 2003. Farming system options for small and marginal holdings in different topographies of Goa. Indian Journal of Agronomy 48 (1): 4-8.
Narain, P. and Bhati, T.K. 2005. Alternative farming system : issue and opportunities in arid ecosystem. In : Proceeding, National Symposium on Alternative Farming Systems held at PDCSR, Modipuram, 16-18 September, 2004, pp. 57-64.
Parthasarathy, V.A., Champakam, B., Kandiannam, K. and Srinivasan,V. 2004. Spices in farming systems. In : Proceeding A symposium on Alternative farming systems: Enhanced income and employment generation options for small and marginal farmers, pp. 144-153.
Radha, Y., Eshwara Prasad, Y. and Vijayabhinandana, B. 2000. Study on income and employment generation on agricultural based livestock farming systems. Paper presented at VIII Annual Conference of AERA at TNUASU, Chennai, 28-29 December, 2000.
Rodriguez, L. and Cuellar, P. 1994. Evaluacion de la Hacienda Arizona como Siustema Intergrado de Produccion. CIPAV : Cali, Colombia.
Shanmugasundaram, V.S. and Baluswamy, M. 1993.




