Effect of different proportion of organic and inorganic nutrients on productivity and profitability of potato (Solanum tuberosum) varieties in Meghalaya hills

Authors

  • L.K. BAISHYA
  • M.KUMAR
  • D.C. GHOSH

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v55i3.4745

Keywords:

Nutrient management, Organic, Potato, Productivity, Profitability

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during summer seasons of 2005 and 2006 at Shillong in split plot design having three potato varieties in the main plots and six organic-inorganic nutrient combinations in the sub-plots with four replications. Among the varieties, Kufr i Megha recorded significantly higher tuber yield when compared with Kufri Giriraj and Kufri Jyoti. Number of tubers/plant, mean tuber weight, marketable and total tuber yield of potato increased significantly due to the use of recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) i.e. 120-52.4-50 kg N-P-K/ha or 75% RDF + 25% recommended dose of N (RDN) through FYM. The yield components and tuber yield decreased gradually as the crop received higher proportion of plant nutrients through FYM. Accordingly, substitution of RDN by FYM resulted in lower tuber productivity which was significantly lower than those of other organic-inorganic combinations except control. Kufri Megha receiving RDF or 75% RDF + 25% RDN through FYM produced the highest tuber yield (27.11/26.98 t/ha) among all treatment combinations. High net return was obtained from the crop receiving 100% RDF or 25% RDN through FYM + 75% RDF. Kufr i Megha at RDF or 75% RDF + 25% RDN through FYM may be recommended for better growth, higher tuber yield and greater net return from potato cultiva- tion in the North Eastern Hill Region of Meghalaya.

References

Arora, S. 2008. Balanced nutrition for suatainable crop production. Krishi World (Pulse of Indian Agriculture). pp. 15.

Gaur, A.C. 2001. Organic manure A basic input organic farming, Indian Farming 51(3): 35.

Ghosh, P.K., Saha, R., Das, A. and Munda, G.C. 2007. Organic farming in India: Potential and Prospects. In: Advancing Organic Farming Technology in India. (Munda, G.C., Ghosh, P.K., Das, A., Nagchan, S.V. and Bujarbaruah, K.M. Eds.) pp. 117.

Govindakrishnan, P.M. and Kushwah, V.S. 2003. Low input technology for potato production. The Potato. pp. 130135. Mehta Publishers, New Delhi, India.

Kumar, M., Gupta. V.K., Gogoi, M.B., Kumar, S., Lal, S.S. and Baishya, L.K. 2005. Effect of poultry manure on potato production under rainfed condition of Meghalaya. Potato Journal 32(34): 242.

Kumar, M., Trehan S.P., Jatav, M.K. and Lal, S.S. 2009. Efficacy of potato (Solanum tuberosum) cultivars under varying levels of nitrogen and growth duration in Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains. Indian Journal of Agronomy 54(1): 6368.

Manna, G.C., Swarup, A., Wanjari, R.H., Singh, Y.V., Ghosh, P.K., Singh, K.N., Tripathi, A.K. and Saha, M.N. 2006. Soil organic matter in a West Bengal Inceptisol after 30 years of multiple cropping and fertilization. Journal of the Soil Science Society of America 70(1): 121129.

Mondal, S.S. and Sarkar, B. 2005. Effect of integrated nutrient management on the growth and productivity of potato (Solanum tuberosum). Environment and Ecology 235: 387391.

Roy Burman, R., Kumar, M. and Nagraj, K.M. 2007. Organic potato production practices and extension strategy. In: Advancing Organic Farming Technology in India. (Munda, G.C., Ghosh, P.K., Das, A., Nagchan, S.V. and Bujarbaruah, K.M. Eds.) pp. 271279.

Singh, B.P. 2005. Potato Cultivars for NEH Region of India. Extension Bulletin No. 41, Central Potato Research Institute, Shimla.

Upadhyaya, N.C., Singh, N., Ranwal, S. and Kumar, P. 2003. Response of two potato cultivars to vermicompost and inorganic fertilizers. Journal of Indian Potato Association 30(1/ 2): 8586.

Downloads

Published

2001-10-10

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

L.K. BAISHYA, M.KUMAR, & D.C. GHOSH. (2001). Effect of different proportion of organic and inorganic nutrients on productivity and profitability of potato (Solanum tuberosum) varieties in Meghalaya hills. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 55(3), 230-234. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v55i3.4745