Agronomic strategies for sustainable use of poor quality water in wheat (Triticum aestivum) and hybrid Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) in a calcareous soil

Authors

  • G.S. BUTTAR
  • H.S. THIND
  • K.S. SEKHON
  • ANUREET KAUR

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v59i4.4598

Keywords:

Bt cotton, Cropping system, Good quality water, Saline sodic water, Wheat

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted from 200506 to 200809 on calcareous soil in semi-arid area, to evaluate the response of each furrow and alternate furrow irrigation in wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) emend. Fiori & Paol.] hybrid Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cropping system using irrigation waters of different qualities. Irrigation was applied to each and alternate furrow on bed-planted wheat followed by cotton for comparison with standard check-basin method of irrigation to both the crops. Three water qualities, namely good quality water (GW), sa- line-sodic water ( SSW) and pre-sowing irrigation to each crop with GW and all subsequent irrigations with SSW (GWpsi+SSW), were evaluated under 3 methods of irrigation (check-basin, each furrow and alternate furrow). The pooled results over 3 years revealed that wheat grain yield was not affected significantly by the quality of irri- gation water. However, significant wheat yield reduction was observed in alternate bed irrigation in all the water qualities. In hybrid Bt cotton, saline sodic water significantly reduced the seed-cotton yield in all the 3 methods of planting. The pre-sowing irrigation with GW and all subsequent irrigations with saline sodic water improved the seed-cotton yield as compared to the application of saline sodic water alone. However, in alternate furrow the yield increase was significant and the yield obtained was equal to the yield under alternate furrow in GW. Re- duced use of irrigation water under alternate furrow resulted in 21, 21 and 25% higher water-use efficiency in wheat under GW, SSW and GWpsi+SSW respectively. The corresponding increase under Bt cotton was 28, 19 and 36%.

References

riculture 32: 26986.

Ahmed, S., Ghafoor, A., Qadir, M. and Abbas Aziz, M. 2006. Amelioration of a calcareous saline-sodic soil by gypsum application and different crop rotations. International Journal of Agricultural Biology 42: 14246.

Aujla, M.S., Thind, H.S. and Buttar, G.S. 2007. Fruit yield and water-use efficiency of eggplant (Solanum melongema L.) as influenced by different quantities of nitrogen and water applied through drip and furrow irrigation. Scientia Horticulturae 112: 14248.

Aujla, M.S., Thind, H.S. and Buttar, G.S. 2008. Response of normally sown and paired sown cotton to various quantities of water applied through drip system. Irrigation Science 26: 35766.

Boumans, J.H., van Hoorn, J.W., Kruseman, G.P. and Tanwar, B.S. 1988. Water table control, reuse and disposal of drainage water in Haryana. Agricultural Water Management 14 : 53745.

Buttar, G.S., Thind, H.S. and Aujla, M.S. 2006. Methods of planting and irrigation at various levels of nitrogen affect the seed yield and water use efficiency in transplanted oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Agricultural Water Management 85: 25360.

Choudhary, O.P., Guman, B.S., Singh, Bijay, Buresh, R.J. and Thuy,

N. 2011. Effects of long-term use of sodic water irrigation, amendments and crop residues on soil properties and crop yields in ricewheat cropping system in a calcareous soil. Field Crops Research 121: 36372.

Datta, K.K. and de Jong, C. 2002. Adverse effect of water logging and soil salinity on crop and land productivity in northwest region of Haryana, India. Agricultural Water Management

: 22338.

Minhas, P.S., Sharma, D.R. and Chauhan, C.P.S. 2004. Management of saline and alkali waters for irrigation. (In:) Advances in Sodic Land Reclamation. International Conference on Sustainable Management of Sodic Lands, held during 914 February 2004, Lunknow, India, pp. 12162.

Munns, R. 2002. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environnent 25: 23950.

Prihar, S.S. and Sandhu, B.S. 1987. Irrigation of Field Crops: Principles and Practices pp. 142. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.

Stone, J.F., Reeves, H.E. and Garton, J.E. 1982. Irrigation water conservation by using wide-spaced furrows. Agricultural Water Management 5: 30917.

Suarez, D.L., Wood, J.D. and Lesch, S.M. 2006. Effect of SAR on water infiltration under a sequential rainwater management system. Agricultural Water Management 86: 15064.

Tang, L.S., Li, Y. and Zhang, J. 2005. Physiological and yield responses of cotton under partial root zone irrigation. Field Crops Research 94: 21423.

Thind, H.S., Aujla, M.S. and Buttar, G.S. 2008. Response of cotton to various levels of nitrogen and water applied to normal and paired sown cotton under drip irrigation in relation to check-basin. Agricultural Water Management 95: 2534.

Downloads

Published

2001-10-10

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

G.S. BUTTAR, H.S. THIND, K.S. SEKHON, & ANUREET KAUR. (2001). Agronomic strategies for sustainable use of poor quality water in wheat (Triticum aestivum) and hybrid Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) in a calcareous soil. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 59(4), 568-574. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v59i4.4598