Tillage and irrigation management in chickpea (Cicer arietinum)fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) cropping system under semi-arid conditions of India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v59i4.4572Keywords:
Chickpea, Fodder sorghum, Irrigation, Soil health, System productivity, TillageAbstract
A field experiment was conducted at Jhansi during the winter season (rabi) of 200910 to rainy season (kharif) of 2012 to study the impact of tillage practices and irrigation management on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and their carry-over effects on succeeding fodder sorghum [Sorghum bicolour (L.) Moench]. Reduced tillage recorded 1.74 t/ha grain yield of chickpea and was on a par with conventional tillage. However, reduced tillage (57.7%) and zero tillage (57.4%) recorded significantly higher harvest index than conventional tillage (55.2%). Similarly, appli- cation of 2 irrigations to chickpea recorded higher grain yield (1.90 t/ha) and system productivity in terms of chickpea-equivalent yield (4.00 t/ha) but application of only 1 irrigation recorded higher irrigation water-use effi- ciency (295 kg grain /ha-cm). Significantly higher plant height, plant population, grains per pod, 100-seed weight, weeds count and weed dry matter were also recorded in irrigated plots than unirrigated control. Higher system productivity in terms of chickpea-equivalent yield (CEY) was recorded under reduced tillage (3.85 t/ha) and con- ventional tillage (3.90 t/ha) than zero tillage. Reduced tillage and 2 irrigations in chickpea recorded higher net re- turns i.e. 33.1 103 and 34.6 103/ha and benefit: cost ratio i.e. 0.85 and 0.87, from whole system. After 3 years, the bulk density of 1530 cm soil depths was lower in zero tillage (1.34 Mg/m3) than conventional (1.40 Mg/ m3) and reduced tillage (1.37 Mg/m3). Similarly, significantly higher values of total organic carbon (10.31 g/kg), electrical conductivity (0.20 dS/m), available N (260.1 kg/ha) and available K (197.7 kg/ha) were recorded under zero tillage. Application of 2 irrigations recorded lower electrical conductivity (0.152 dS/m) and available N (237.0 kg/ha) and higher available K (189.8 kg/ha) status.References
Angadi, S.V., McConkey, B.G., Cutforth, H.W., Miller, P.R., Ulrich, D., Selles, F., Volkmar, K.M., Entz, M.H. and Brandt, S.A. 2008. Adaptation of alternative pulse and oilseed crops to semi arid Canadian pairie: seed yield and water use efficiency. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 88: 42538.
Barzegar, A.R., Asoodar, M.A., Khadish, A., Hashemi, A.M. and Herbert, S.J. 2003. Soil physical characteristics and chickpea yield responses to tillage treatments. Soil and Tillage Research 71(1): 4957.
Chaudhary V.P., Gangwar, B. and Pandey, D.K. 2006. Auditing of energy use and output of different cropping systems in India. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal 8: 65258.
Ibagimov, N., Evett, S., Esenbecov, Y., Khasanova, F., Karabaev, I., Mirzaev, L. and Lamers, J. 2011. Permanent beds vs. conventional tillage in irrigated arid central Asia. Agronomy Journal 103(4): 100211.
Kaushik, M.K. and Chaubey, A.K. 1999. Studies on irrigation requirement of chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Indian Journal of Agronomy 44(2): 36769.
Mishra, J.S., Singh, V.P., Bhanu, C. and Subrahmanyam, D. 2012.
Crop establishment, tillage and weed management techniques on weed dynamics and productivity of rice (Oryza sativa) chickpea (Cicer arietinum) cropping system. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 82(1): 1520.
Naresh, R.K., Singh, O.P. and Gupta, R.K. 1985. Growth and yield attributing parameters in relation to different irrigations in chickpea. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology 28(4): 323
Rathore, A.L., Pal, A.R. and Sahu, K.K. 1998. Tillage and mulching effect on water use, root growth and yield of rainfed mustard and chickpea grown after lowland rice. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 78: 14961.
Singh, D., Chhonkar, P.K. and Pandey, R.N. 1999. Soil Plant Water Analysis: A Methods Manual, pp. 160. Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi.
Singh, K.B., Malhotra, R.S. and Saxena, M.C. 1989. Chickpea evaluation for cold tolerance under field condition. Crop Science 29: 28285.
Singh, S., Saini, S.S. and Singh, B.P. 2004. Effect of irrigation, sulphur and seed inoculation on growth, yield and sulphur uptake of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) under late sown conditions. Indian Journal of Agronomy 49(1): 5759.
Tripathi, R.S., Kumar, M., Pandey, N., Sonboir, H.L. and Pandey, D. 2004. Establishment, yield and water use efficiency of on-farm rainfed chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) as influenced by tillage practices. Annals of Agricultural Research 25(1): 35
Veronica, Munoz-Romero, V., Lopez-Bellido, L. and Lopez-Bellido,
R.J. 2012. The effects of the tillage system on chickpea root growth. Field Crops Research 128: 7681.
West, T.O. and Post, W.M. 2002. Soil organic carbon sequestration rates by tillage and crop rotation: a global data analysis. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66: 193046.




