Effect of fertility levels and weed-management practices on yield potential, nutri- ent uptake and economics of spring-planted sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum)

Authors

  • VACHIN KUMAR
  • SANDEEP KUMAR
  • SANJAY KUMAR
  • OMBIR SINGH
  • VIPIN KUMAR

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v59i1.4529

Keywords:

Cane yield, Economics, NPK levels, Nutrient uptake, Sugarcane, Weed management

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out during the spring seasons of 200708 and 200809 at Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh to study the effect of NPK levels and weed-management practices on yield potential, nutrient uptake and economics of sugarcane ( Saccharum officinar um L.). The crop was fertilized with 75% recommended dose of fer- tilizer (RDF), 100% RDF (150:60:60 kg/ha of N: P O : K O) and 125% RDF in combination with 7 weed manage- 2 5 2 ment practices, viz. weedy check; weed free; three hoeing at 30, 60 and 90 days after planting; one hoeing at 30 days after planting followed by atrazine @ 2.0 kg a.i./ha; atrazine @ 2.0 kg a.i./ha as pre-emergence (PE) + 2,4-D @ 1.0 kg a.i./ha at 60 days after planting; glyphosate @ 1.0 kg a.i./ha at 25 days after planting + one hoeing at 60 days after planting and Sesbania sowing in inter-row space followed by 2,4-D @ 1.0 kg a.i./ha at 45 days after planting. The crop fertilized with 125% RDF being at par with RDF resulted in the highest cane yield and number of millable canes, being 15.5 and 22.3% higher respectively, than lower fertility level mainly because of remarkable improvement in individual cane weight, cane girth, cane length, tillering and lower mortality. The dose of 125% RDF was found economically more sound, as it generated the highest return of 86,740/ha with benefit: cost ratio of 2.35. The highest nutrient uptake by sugarcane and total nutrient removal by sugarcane + weeds was recorded with 125% RDF which was significantly higher over RDF. The total uptake of nutrients followed the trend similar to that of nutrient removal by sugarcane. Among the weed-management practices, 3 manual hoeings at 30, 60 and 90 days after planting being at par with the treatment post-emergence application of glyphosate @ 1.0 kg a.i. at 25 days after planting + one hoeing at 60 days after planting proved efficient in controlling the weed population and dry-matter production all the growth stages, as evident by the highest weed control efficiency. The cane yield, millable canes and nutrient removal were witnessed higher under glyphosate @ 1.0 kg a.i. at 25 days after plant- ing + one hoeing at 60 days after planting, followed by 3 manual hoeing at 30, 60 and 90 days after planting. Under weedy check plots, weeds removed the maximum nutrients, whereas lower uptake was observed under weed free conditions. Glyphosate @ 1.0 kg a.i./ha at 25 days after planting + 1 hoeing at 60 days after planting was the best weed-management practices for higher net return ( 91,067/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (3.60) when it was com- pared to other treatments.

References

Khokar, A.K. and Nepaliya,V. 2010. Effect of herbicides and nutri

ent management on weed flora, nutrient uptake and yield of

wheat under irrigated condition. Indian Journal of Weed

Science 42(1-2): 1418. Kumar, S., Rana N.S. and Singh, R. 2004. Production potential of

spring sugarcane as influenced by intercropping of dual-pur

pose legumes under tarai conditions of Uttaranchal. Indian

Journal of Agronomy 51(4): 27173.

Nagraju, M.S., Shankuriah, C. and Ravindra, V. 2000. Effect of integrated use of fertilizers with sulphitation pressmud and Azotobactor on growth and yield of sugarcane. Co-operative Sugar 3(5): 39195.

Pandey, D.K., Kumar, S., Singh, P.K. and Singh, J. 2012. Interpreting phenotypic stability in sugarcane using different parametric models. Indian Journal of Sugarcane Technology 27(1): 4853.

Rana, N.S., Singh, A.K., Kumar, S. and Kumar, S. 2003. Effect of trash mulching and nitrogen application on growth and yield of sugarcane. Indian Journal of Agronomy 48(2): 12426.

Raskar, B.S. 2004. Evaluation of herbicides for weed control in sugarcane. Sugar Technology 6(3): 17375.

Singh, A. and Kaur, C. 2003. Evaluation of herbicides for the control of weeds in spring planted sugarcane. Sugar Technology 5(4): 31718.

Singh, R., Sen, D., Singh, V.K., Rana, N.S. and Kumar, S. 2005. Effect of weed management practices on spring planted sugarcane and associated weeds. Indian Journal of Agronomy 50(3): 23638.

Shahi, H. N. 2002. Crashing prices cause concern. The Hindu Survey of Indian Agriculture p. 11924.

Singh, A.K. and Lal, Menhi. 2008. Weed management in spring-planted sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid) based intercropping systems. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 78(1): 3539.

Singh, H., Kumar, Navneet and Singh, VP. 2008. Response of sugarcane varieties to fertility levels under rainfed condition. Rajendra Agricultural University Journal of Research 18(1 and 2): 3436.

Srivastava, T.K. 2001. Efficacy of certain new herbicides in spring planted sugarcane. Indian Journal of Weed Science 35(1 and 2): 5658.

Srivastava, T.K. and Chauhan, R.S. 2006. Weed dynamics and control of weeds in relation to management practices under sugarcane (Saccharum species complex hybrid) multi-ratooning system. Indian Journal of Agronomy 51(3): 22831.

Virida, H.M. and Patel, C.L. 2010. Integrated nutrient management for sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid complex) plant-ratoon system. Indian Journal of Agronomy 55(2): 14751.

Downloads

Published

2001-10-10

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

VACHIN KUMAR, SANDEEP KUMAR, SANJAY KUMAR, OMBIR SINGH, & VIPIN KUMAR. (2001). Effect of fertility levels and weed-management practices on yield potential, nutri- ent uptake and economics of spring-planted sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 59(1), 128-133. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v59i1.4529