Precision nitrogen-management practices influences growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under conservation agriculture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v60i4.4505Keywords:
Growth parameters, NDVI, SPAD, STCR, Yield attributes and YieldAbstract
A field experiment was conducted at New Delhi during the winter (rabi') season of 201213, to study the preci- Sion nitrogen management in wheat [Triticum aestivum emend. Fiori & Paol-] grown under conservation agri- culture. The experiment was laid out in a factorial randomized-block design with 20 treatments combinations of four nutrient management in preceding maize (Zea mays L.) [absolute control, recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF), 50% RDF and site-specific nutrient management (SSNM)] and 5 precision nitrogen-management practices in Wheat [control, RDF, green seeker, SPAD and soil-test crop response (STCR)]. Among the tested technologies for precision N management; a saving of N by 9.5 and 30 kg with green seeker and SPAD, respectively, while en- hancement of 18.4 kg Wha by STCR was found compared with RDF. The STCR-based nutrient-management plots received very less potassium (5.6 kg/ha) than RDF (40 kg/ha). The wheat growth parameters, viz. plant height, dry-matter accumulation, leaf-area index (LAI), tillers, crop-growth rate (CGR), relative growth rate (RGR) and net assimilation rate (NAR) were significantly higher by STCR-based nutrient management as well as with nu- trient expert-based SSNM applied in maize as residual effect. The yield attributes, viz. effective tillers/m2, grains/ spike, harvest index and 1 ,OOO-grain weight, were also recorded significantly higher with STCR and SSNM. How- ever, the grain yield was 5% higher with STCR compared to RDF which was on a par with green seeker-based N management. Thus, the RDF in wheat needs to be revisited in westem Indo Gangetic plains (IGP) as it responded to higher N levels and lower K application and green seeker sensor can be used for real time N management of wheat in this region while SSNM found best for maize.References
Jat, M.L., Bijay-Singh and Gerard, Bruno. 2014. Nutrient management and use efficiency in wheat systems of South Asia. Advances in Agronomy 125: 171259.
Jat, M.L., Satyanarayana, T., Majumdar, Kaushik, Parihar, C.M., Jat, S.L., Tetarwal, J.P., Jat, R.K. and Saharawat, Y.S. 2013. Fertilizer best management practices for maize systems. Indian Journal of Fertilisers 9(4): 8094.
Khurana, H.S., Phillips, S.B., Singh, B., Alley, M.M., Dobermann, A., Sidhu, A.S., Singh, Y. and Peng, S. 2008. Agronomic and economic evaluation of site-specific nutrient management for irrigated wheat in northwest India. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystem 82: 1531.
Kumar, V., Singh, A.K., Jat, S.L., Parihar, C.M., Pooniya, V., agement on productivity and economics of rice (Oryza sa-Sharma, S. and Singh, B. 2014. Influence of site-specific tiva)wheat (Triticum aestivum) system. Indian Journal of nutrient management on growth and yield of maize (Zea Agronomy 58(3): 28287. mays) under conservation tillage. Indian Journal of Singh, B. 2008. Crop demand-driven site-specific nitrogen applica-Agronomy 59(4): 65760. tions in rice (Oryza sativa) and wheat (Triticum aestivum):
Mauriya, A.K., Maurya, V.K., Tripathi, H.P., Verma, R.K. and some recent advances. Indian Journal of Agronomy 53(3): Radhey Shyam. 2013. Effect of site-specific nutrient man-15766.




