Herbicidal control of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) and its impact on aquatic environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v60i4.4502Keywords:
Fish mortality, Herbicides, Histopathology, Irrigability, Water hyacinth, Water qualityAbstract
A research programme was taken up to study the impact of herbicides on the control of water hyacinth [Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms-laubach], optimize dose and time of application, and to trace the impact on aquatic environment through a series of greenhouse and pond studies. The study was undertaken at Veeranum Lake which has a command area of 18,000 ha connected through 27 distributary channels, and infested heavily with water hyacinth. Among the different herbicides tried, viz. glyphosate, 2,4-D Na salt and paraquat, glyphosate proved more efficient with higher magnitude of plant height reduction, weed mortality and reduction in biomass compared with 2,4-D and paraquat. The optimum dose of glyphosate, 2,4-D Na salt and paraquat was 2.5 kg/ha, 1.5 kg/ha and 1.5 kg/ha respectively. Different seasons did not influence the efficacy of herbicides. Glyphosate caused least fish mortality of 23.3% after 32 days. Different organs like gills, brain, liver and kidney of the fishes were studied, for histology and the observations showed tissue distractions in herbicides- treated fish. Glyphosate also proved more efficient and safe on water quality in terms of pH, electrical conductivity, dissolved oxygen, chemical oxygen demand and mineral content of treated water. The glyphosate-treated water was found safe for irrigating crops with 87, 58 and 62% germination of rice, cotton and okra respectively.References
Deivasigamani, S. and Kathiresan, RM. 2013. Changes in physicochemical properties of aquatic environment due to herbicidal control of water hyacinth. Green Farming 4(1): 12324.
Harley, K.L.S., Julien, M.H. and Wright, A.D. 1996. Water hyacinth: A tropical worldwide problem and methods for its control. (In) Proceedings of the Second International Weed Control Congress, held during 2528 June at Denmark, pp. 63944.
Kannan, C. and Kathiresan, R.M. 2002. Herbicidal control of water hyacinth and its impact of fish growth and water quality. Indian Journal of Weed Science 34(1 and 2): 9295.
Kathiresan, R.M. 2000. Allelopathic potential of native plants on water hyacinth. Crop Protection 19(810): 70508.
Kathiresan, R.M. and Ramah, K. 2000. Impact of weed management in ricefish farming systems, Indian Journal of Weed Science 32(1 and 2): 3943.
Murugesan, A.G., Ruby, J., Paulraj, M.G. and Sukumaran, N. 2005. Impact of different densities and temperature regimes on the feeding behaviour of water hyacinth weevils, Neochetina bruchii and Neochetina eichhorniae on Eichhornia crassipes. Asian Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Environmental Sciences 7(1): 7376.
Patnaik, B.B., Hongray Howrelia, J., Theresia Mathews and Selvanayagam, M. 2011. Histopathology of gill, liver, muscle and brain of Cyprinus carpio communis L. exposed to sublethal concentration of lead and cadmium. African Journal of Biotechnology 10(57): 12,218223.
Reza Sayrafi, Gholamreza Najafi, Hooman Rahmati-Holasoo, Aref Hooshyari, Ramin Akbari, Sara Shokrpoor and Masoomeh Ghadam. 2011. Histological study of hepatopancreas in Hi Fin Pangasius (Pangasius sanitwongsei). African Journal of Biotechnology 10 (17): 3,463466.
Singh, S. and Gill, M.S. 1996. Evapo-transpiration loss of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) and chemical control of the weed. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 66 (8) : 487
Waelder, L. and Schmidt, R.R. HRAC. 2000. (In:) The World of Herbicides. (http://www.plantprotection.org/hrac.).




