Productivity and profitability of intercrops under four tree species throughout their rotation in north-western India

NAVNEET KAUR; BALJIT SINGH; R.I.S. GILL

doi:10.59797/ija.v62i2.4295

Authors

NAVNEET KAUR
BALJIT SINGH
R.I.S. GILL

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v62i2.4295

Keywords:

Agroforestry, Economics, Growth parameters, Intercropping, Soil fertility

Abstract

In an experiment, different crops, viz. pearlmillet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.], wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), Egyptian clover (Trifolium alexandrinum L.) and annual turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) were evaluated during 2005 to 2011 at Ludhiana, Punjab under 4 agroforestry tree species, viz. necklace poplar (Populus deltoides Bartr ex. Marsh.), eucalypt (Eucalyptus tereticornis Sm.), M. composita Willd. and toon (Toona ciliata M. Roem) during first to sixth year of tree age. Tree growth parameters, growth and yield param- eters of intercrops and sole crops, soil organic carbon, nutrient status and economics of agroforestry systems were determined. The diameter at breast height (DBH) and height of poplar and eucalypt were higher than the other species after 6 years of age. The fresh stem biomass was the lowest (73 t/ha) in toon and the highest in eu- calypt (213 t/ha). The growth and yield of all the crops declined under tree plantations with the increase in growth of trees during each subsequent year. Toon plantation had the minimum adverse effect on understorey crops, whereas eucalypt caused the maximum reduction in yield of all the intercrops. When grown as intercrops under tree block plantations, productivity of turmeric and wheat was better than the other crops under tree species. Amongst different tree-crop combinations, intercropping of turmeric with poplar and eucalypt gave the maximum net returns ( 16,22,225 and 14,62,065/ha respectively) followed by poplarwheat ( 14,30,000/ha). Agroforestry systems also improved the soil fertility status. Soil organic carbon, six years after planting, was the highest under Melia, i.e. 21.2% increase over its initial level (2.83 g/kg). Available N and P were the highest under Melia (139.1 kg/ha) and poplar (15.65 kg/ha) based agroforestry system, respectively, at the end of the experiment.

References

Allen, S.C., Jose, S., Nair, P.K.R., Brecke, B.J. and Ramsey, C.L.

Safety-net role of tree roots: evidence from a pecan

(Carya illinoensis K. Koch)cotton (Gossypium hirsutum

L.) alley cropping system in the southern United States. For

est Ecology and Management 192(23): 395407. Dawar, S., Summaira, M., Younus, M.T. and Zaki, M.J. 2007. Use of Eucalyptus sp., in the control of root infecting fungi on mungbean and chickpea. Pakistan Journal of Botany 39(3): 975979.

Dhillon, W.S., Chauhan, S.K. and Singh, N. 2009. Physiology and yield of turmeric under poplar canopy. Asia -Pacific Agroforestry Newsletter 35: 56.

Dhyani, S.K., Handa, A.K. and Uma. 2013. Area under agroforestry in India: An assessment for present status and future perspective. Indian Journal of Agroforestry 15(1): 111.

Edmonds, J.M. 1993. The potential value of Toona species (Meliaceae) as multipurpose and plantation trees in Southeast Asia. The Commonwealth Forestry Review 72(3): 181

Fang, S., Xu, X., Yu, X. and Zhengcai, Li. 2005. Poplar in wetland agroforestry: a case study of ecological benefits, site productivity, and economics. Wetlands Ecology and Management 13(1): 93104.

Fang, S., H, Li., Sun, Q. and Chen, L. 2010. Biomass production and carbon stocks in poplar-crop intercropping systems: a case study in northwestern Jiangsu, China. Agroforesrty Systems 79(2): 213222.

Gill, R.I.S., Singh, B. and Kaur, N. 2009. Productivity and nutrient uptake of newly released wheat varieties at different sowing times under poplar plantation in north-western India. Agroforesrty Systems 76(3): 579590.

Hossain, M.A., Hikaru, A.K., Ishimine, Y., Teruya, R., Aniya, Y. and Yamawaki, K. 2009. Effects of relative light intensity on the growth, yield and curcumin content of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) in Okinawa, Japan. Plant Production Science 12(1): 2936.

Kotowskil, W., Andel, V. J., Diggelen, V. R. and Hogendorf, J. 2001. Response of fen plant species to groundwater level and light intensity, Netherlands. Plant Ecology 155: 147156.

Kakiuchi, J. and Kobata, T. 2004. Shading and thinning effects on seed and shoot dry matter increase in determinate soybean during the seed filling period. Agronomy Journal 96(2): 398405.

Kasajima, S., Inoue, N., Mahmud, R., Fujita, K. and Kato, M. 2007. Effect of light quality on developmental rate of wheat under continuous light at a constant temperature. Plant Production Science 10(3): 286291.

Kumar, A., Hooda, M.S. and Bahadur, R. 1998. Impact of multipurpose trees on productivity of barley in arid ecosystem. Annals of Arid Zone 37(2): 153157.

Kumar, A. and Nandal, D.P.S. 2004. Performance of winter crops under Eucalyptus tereticornis based agri-silviculture system. Indian Journal of Agroforestry 6(2): 9799.

Manna, M.C., Ghosh, P.K. and Acharya, C.L. 2008. Sustainable crop production through management of soil organic carbon in semiarid and tropical India. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 2(3): 85114.

Masoodi, T.H., Masoodi, N.A., Gangoo, S.A., Mushtaq, S.M. and Ahmad, H. 2013. Comparative field performance of some agricultural crops under a canopy of Populus deltoides and Ulmus wallichiana. Journal of Forestry Research 24(4): 783790.

Muthuri, C.W., Ong, C.K., Black, C.R., Ngumi, V.W. and Mati,

B.M. 2005. Tree and crop productivity in Grevillea, Alnus and Paulownia-based agroforestry systems in semi-arid Kenya. Forest Ecology Management 212(1): 2339.

Nair, P.K.R., Kumar, B.M. and Nair, Y.D. 2009. Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 172(1): 1023.

Piper, G.S. 1966. Soil and Plant Analysis, Hans Publications, Bombay, Maharashtra. pp. 368.

Puri, S. and Nair, P.K.R. 2004. Agroforestry research for development in India: 25 years of experiences of a national program. Agroforestry System 61(13): 437452.

Rivest, D., Alain, C., Anne, V. and Alain, O. 2009. Production of soybean associated with different hybrid poplar clones in a tree-based intercropping system in southwestern Qubec, Canada. Agriculture Ecosystem and Environment 131(1): 5160.

Sanou, J., Bayala, J., Teklehaimanot, Z. and Bazie, P. 2012. Effect of shading by baobab (Adansonia digitata) and nere (Parkia biglobosa) on yields of millet (Pennisetum glaucum) and taro (Colocasia esculenta) in Parkland Systems in Burkina Faso, West Africa. Agroforestry Systems 85(3): 431441.

Singh, A. and Kumar, A. 2014. Critical issues in poplar-based agroforestry system. Indian Journal of Agroforestry 16(1): 5867.

Subbiah, B.V. and Asija. C.L. 1956. A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soil. Current Science 25(8): 259260.

Samra, J.S., Dhyani, B.L. and Sharma, A.R. 1999. Problem and prospects of natural resource management in Indian Himalayas- a base paper. Hill and Mountain Agro-ecosystem Directorate, NATP, CSWCRTI, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, p.

Wanvestraut, R.H., Jose, S., Nair, P.K.R. and Brecke, B.J. 2004. Competition for water in a pecan (Carya illinoensis K. Koch)cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) alley cropping system in the Southern United States. Agroforestry Systems 60(2): 167179.

Yadhav, R.S., Yadhav, B.L., Chippa, B.R. and Keshwar, G.L. 2005. Nutrient removal and yield wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as influenced by different tree species in agroforestry under semiarid condition of Rajasthan. Indian Journal of Agroforestry 7(1): 2124.