Evaluation of sugargraze (Sorghum bicolor), fodder maize (Zea mays) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) under different sources of nitrogen

Authors

  • SURAJ KAR
  • MAGAN SINGH
  • PARVEEN KUMAR
  • RAKESH KUMAR
  • GOVIND MAKARANA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v62i2.4290

Keywords:

Fodder maize, Fodder sorghum, Nitrogen sources, Sugargraze

Abstract

The present study was carried out at Karnal, Haryana during rainy (kharif) season of 201415 to estimate green fodder yield, dry fodder yield and nitrogen uptake in fodder maize (Zea mays L.), fodder sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] and sugargraze (Sorghum bicolor) in response to organic and inorganic sources of nitrogen. The highest green fodder yield (63.74 t/ha), N uptake (259.1 kg/ha) and crude protein (10.42%) was recorded in sugargraze crop and the percent dry-matter was the highest in fodder sorghum (23.83%). Among the fertilizer sources, 100% N through inorganic form recorded the highest green fodder (51.10 t/ha), N uptake (230.0 kg/ha) and crude protein (10.2%). The N content as well as its uptake was also significantly higher in sugargraze than fodder maize and fodder sorghum. The highest net income ( 75,986/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (4.87) were ob- tained in sugargraze. Among the nitrogen sources, inorganic source of nitrogen recorded maximum net income ( 56,505/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (3.78). The study demonstrated that the fodder sugargraze has a capacity to accumulate dry-matter and N rapidly especially under inorganic fertilization. It could be a better choice in well irri- gated fertilized soils as a high yielding fodder crop.

References

Afzal, M., Ahmad, A. and Ahmad, A.U.H. 2012. Effect of nitrogen on growth and yield of sorghum forage (Sorghum bicolor) under three cuttings system. Agronomical Research in Moldavia 45(4): 5764.

Almodares, A., Jafarinia, M. and Hadi, M.R. 2009. The effects of nitrogen fertilizer on chemical compositions in corn and sweet sorghum. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences 6(4): 441446.

AOAC. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis. 18th Revised Edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Arlington, Virginia, USA.

Gabir, S.I.M.N., Khanna, M., Singh, M., Parihar, S.S., Mani, I. and Das, T.K. 2014. Effect of conservation practices and fertilizer on sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) yield under rainfed conditions of northern India. Indian Journal of Agronomy 59(2): 301305.

IRRI. 1999. IRRISTAT for windows version 4.0. Biometric Unit, IRRI, Los Banos, Philippines.

Kar, S., Singh, M., Kumar, R. and Kumar, P. 2016. Fodder yield and quality of sugargraze, sorghum and maize as affected by nitrogen sources. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 33(2): 160163.

Mahdi, S.S., Hasan, B. and Singh, L. 2012. Influence of seed rate, nitrogen and zinc on fodder maize (Zea mays) in temperate conditions of western Himalayas. Indian Journal of Agronomy 57(1): 8588.

Ramos, T.B., Simunek, J., Goncalves, M.C., Martins, J.C., Prazeres,

A. and Pereira, L.S. 2012. Two-dimensional modeling of water and nitrogen fate from sweet sorghum irrigated with fresh and blended saline waters. Agricultural Water Management 111: 87104.

Rasheed, M., Mahmood, T., Nazir, M.S., Bhutta, W.A. and Ghaffar,

A. 2004. Nutrient efficiency and economics of hybrid maize under different planting methods and nutrient levels. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 6(5): 922925.

Subbiah, B.V. and Asija, G.L. 1956.

Downloads

Published

2001-10-10

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

SURAJ KAR, MAGAN SINGH, PARVEEN KUMAR, RAKESH KUMAR, & GOVIND MAKARANA. (2001). Evaluation of sugargraze (Sorghum bicolor), fodder maize (Zea mays) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) under different sources of nitrogen. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 62(2), 236-238. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v62i2.4290