Performance of canola oilseed rape (Brassica napus), Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata) and Indian rape (Brassica rapa) in the intercropping system

Authors

  • MANDEEP KAUR
  • VIRENDER SARDANA
  • PUSHP SHARMA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v62i2.4283

Keywords:

Brassica species, Growth, Income, Intercropping, Oil content, Yield, Yield attributes

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Ludhiana, Punjab, during the winter (rabi) season of 201415, to study the production potential of Indian rape (Brassica rapa var. toria), oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) and Ethiopian mus- tard (Brassica carinata A. Braun) in different row spacings and row proportions in the intercropping systems. The experiment comprised 14 treatments which were replicated thrice as per randomized complete-block design. Plant height at maturity and dry-matter accumulation (DMA) at 90 days after sowing by component crops decreased sig- nificantly in intercropping as compared to their sole crops and such reduction in plant height was more for the nar- row row spacing, and for DMA with increasing row spacing. Number of siliquae/plant and 1,000- seed weight of In- dian rape and Ethiopian mustard, and number of seeds/siliqua of Ethiopian mustard were not influenced by the in- tercropping. The highest seed yield given by Indian rape (1.16 t/ha) in Ethiopian mustard + Indian rape intercrop- ping system (1:2, 22.5 cm) was 80.5% of its sole crop yield. Seed yield of non-canola oilseed rape when inter- cropped with Indian rape (1:1, 22.5 cm) was 45.7% lower than its sole crop yield (1.85 t/ha). However, oilseed rape-equivalent yield produced by non-canola oilseed rape + Indian rape (1 : 1, 22.5 cm) was 22.9% higher than sole non canola oilseed rape. Similarly, sole crop of canola oilseed rape (1.63 t/ha) gave 91.0, 60.2 and 35.3% higher seed yield than its yield under intercropping with Indian rape in different row proportions and spacing. Oil- seed rape- equivalent yield in the canola oilseed rape + Indian rape sown in 1 : 1 and 2 : 1 row proportion at 22.5 cm row spacing was 16.9 and 20.1% higher than sole canola oilseed rape (1.63 t/ha). Similar to seed yields, sto- ver yields of component crops were significantly decreased in the intercropping system (ICS). Canola/ non-canola oilseed rape based intercropping system (ICS) resulted in higher net returns than sole crops, whereas Ethiopian mustard sown as sole crop was more remunerative than its intercropping with Indian rape.

References

DAC, 201516. Annual Report, 201415. Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India. Agricultural Trade, pp. 138143. (www.agricoop.nic.in).

Gupta, T.R. and Saini, J.S. 1986. Follow relay cropping of toria and gobhi sarsonA diversification in cropping pattern. Seeds and Farms 58(1): 3536.

Gupta, T.R., Saini, J.S. and Labana, K.S. 1989. Intercropping of Indian mustard (Brassica napus var. napus) and gobhi sarson (Brassica napus subsp. olifera var. annua) with different planting patterns. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 59: 349353.

Sardana, V. and Sidhu, M.S. 1994. Effect of integrated nutrient management on the quality and oil yield of Indian rape (Brassica campestris var. toria) + Swede rape (Brassica napus L.) intercropping system. Crop Research 8: 431436.

Srivastava, R.K., Patel, D.A., Saravaiya, S.N. and Chaudhri, P.P. 2008. Intercropping of wheat and mustardA review. Agriculture Review 29(3): 167176.

Taylor, D.C., Kevin, C., Falk, C., Don, P. and Hammerlindl, V.B. 2010. Brassica carinataa new molecular farming platform for delivering bio-industrial oil feedstocks: case studies of genetic modifications to improve very long-chain fatty acid and oil content in seeds. Biofuels Bioproducts Biorefining 4: 538561.

Downloads

Published

2001-10-10

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

MANDEEP KAUR, VIRENDER SARDANA, & PUSHP SHARMA. (2001). Performance of canola oilseed rape (Brassica napus), Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata) and Indian rape (Brassica rapa) in the intercropping system. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 62(2), 211-214. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v62i2.4283