Influence of moisture-management practices on productivity, profitability and energy dynamics of rainfed maize (Zea mays) in semi-arid sub-tropical climate

Authors

  • PRAVEEN JAKHAR
  • K.S. RANA
  • ANCHAL DASS
  • ANIL K. CHOUDHARY
  • MUKESH CHOUDHARY

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v62i2.4279

Keywords:

Flat sowing, Maize, Residue, Ridge and furrow, VAM, Water-use efficiency

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, during the rainy (kharif) seasons of 2014 and 2015, to study the impact of moisture-conservation techniques on growth, pro- ductivity and profitability of maize (Zea mays L.). The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with 3 replications in a fixed lay-out. The treatments consisted of 4 moisture-conservation practices, viz. ridge and furrow (RF), RF + crop residue (CR) @ 4 t/ha, RF + CR @ 2 t/ha + VAM and flat sowing (FS). Among different moisture conservation techniques, RF with 4 t/ha CR recorded significant effect on growth parameters, viz. plant height, dry-matter accumulation (DMA) and leaf-area index (LAI) of maize in comparison to non-residue plots and FS. Values of canopy temperature depression (CTD) were significantly influenced by treatments 30 and 60 days after sowing (DAS), but remained unaffected at 90 DAS. SPAD values at 30, 60 and 90 DAS differed significantly at all stages and showed normal curve pattern with maximum values at 60 DAS. The treatment crop residue @ 4 t/ha in RF system produced numerically higher grain and stover yields of 3.43 and 9.51 t/ha respectively. Maize planted under RF with 4 t/ha CR exhibited significantly higher water-use efficiency (WUE) of 12.3 kg/ha-mm, followed by RF + CR 2 t/ha + VAM (10.9 kg/ha-mm) as compared to FS (8.45 kg/ha-mm) maximum net returns were obtained under RF + CR 4 t/ha (35.8 103 /ha) and the least under FS (22.7 103 /ha). Residue-based treatment, RF + CR 4 t/ha resulted in benefit: cost ratio of maximum value (1.39) maximum energy intensiveness (2.32 MJ/ ) and specific energy (17.57 MJ/kg) were also obtained for treatment RF + CR 4 t/ha.

References

Abadassi, J. 2015. Correlation between agronomic traits in maize populations. International Journal of Science and Environment and Technology 4(5): 1,2581,264.

Amin, M., Ullah, A.R. and Ramzan, M. 2006. Effect of planting methods, seed density and nitrogen phosphorus (NP) fertilizer levels on sweet corn (Zea mays L.) Journal of Research (Science), Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan 17(2): 8389.

Arora, S. and Bhatt, R. 2008. Impact of improved soil and in-situ water conservation practices on productivity in rainfed foothill region of north-west India. (In) Proceedings of 15th Annual Conference of International Society of Soil Conservation, Budapest 1823 May, 2008.

Bhale, V.M. and Wanjari, S.S. 2009. Conservation agriculture: A new paradigms to increase resource use efficiency Indian Journal of Agronomy 54(2): 166177.

CRIDA. 2015. Vision 2050. ICAR Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad, India, p. 1.

Ghosh, A. P., Dass, A., Kaur, R. and Kumar, A. 2016. Yield components and nutrient accumulation in maize (Zea mays) under variable growing environments and chlorophyll meter guided nitrogen fertilization. Indian Journal of Agronomy 61(2): 252255.

Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. 2010. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, edn 2, p. 704. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

GoI. 2016. Agricultural Situation in India. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare Government of India, Hutments, Dalhousie Road, New Delhi, April (LXXIII): 1315.

Govaerts, B. and Verhulst, N. 2010. The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) Green SeekerTM handheld sensor: Toward the integrated evaluation of crop management. Part A:

Concepts and case studies. CIMMYT, Mexico, D.F.

Khera, K.L. and Singh, G. 1995. Effect of paddy straw mulch and rainfall intensity on runoff and soil loss under simulated rainfall. Indian Journal of Soil Conservation 23: 2023.

Kumar, A., Rana, K.S., Rana, D.S., Bana, R.S., Choudhary, A.K. and Pooniya, V. 2015. Effect of nutrient and moisture management practices on crop productivity, water-use efficiency and energy dynamics in rainfed maize (Zea mays) + soybean (Glycine max) intercropping system. Indian Journal of Agronomy 60(1): 152156.

Lorzadeh, S., Mahdavidamghani, A., Enayatgholizadeh, M.R. and Yousefi, M. 2012. Research of energy use efficiency for maize production systems in Izeh, Iran Acta Agriculturae Slovenica 99(2): 137142.

Ravisankar, N., Balakrishnan, M., Ambast, S.K., Srivastava, R.C., Bommayasamy, N. and Subramani, T. 2014. Influence of irrigation and crop residue mulching on yield and water productivity of table purpose groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) in humid tropical Island. Legume Research 37(2): 195200.

Singh, S.S., Singh, A.K. and Sundaram, P.K. 2014. Agro technological options for upscaling agricultural productivity in eastern Indo-gangetic plains under impending climate change situations: A review. Journal of Agrisearch 1(2): 5565.

Downloads

Published

2001-10-10

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

PRAVEEN JAKHAR, K.S. RANA, ANCHAL DASS, ANIL K. CHOUDHARY, & MUKESH CHOUDHARY. (2001). Influence of moisture-management practices on productivity, profitability and energy dynamics of rainfed maize (Zea mays) in semi-arid sub-tropical climate. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 62(2), 191-196. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v62i2.4279