Participatory evaluation of choice and combination of enterprises for integrated farming system under dry-land and irrigated agro-ecosystems

Authors

  • ARUN BALAMATTI
  • SHAMARAJ

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v62i1.4267

Keywords:

Complementary enterprises, Dryland, Integrated farming system, Irrigated, Livelihoods, Supplementary enterprises

Abstract

The Krishi Vigyan Kendra Sutur, Mysore, has developed 6 integrated farming system (IFS models), 3 each un- der dryland and irrigated farming situations, between 2012 and 2015. The models were analyzed using case- study approach to draw principles of enterprise combination. The average number of enterprizes for 3 dryland models, sericulture, horticulture and cotton (Gossypium sp.)-- based IFS, during base year and after 3 years was 3 and 13, respectively; it was 6 and 14, respectively, for the 3 irrigated models, organic horticulture, sericulture and agro-forestry-based IFS. The maximum annual net incomes under dryland in the base year were from agriculture ( 49,600/ha), coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) ( 39,800) and sericulture ( 16,700/ha); after 3 years, the order changed to coconut ( 46,000), sericulture ( 30,900) and agriculture ( 16,600). Under irrigated condition higher net returns in the base year came from coconut ( 94,000/ha), horticulture ( 42,300/ha) and vegetables ( 40,000/ ha), which changed after 3 years to coconut ( 1,34,500/ha), sericulture ( 81,400/ha) and silviculture ( 77,600/ ha). However, the maximum benefit: cost ratio under dry farming was from forage crops and goat/sheep rearing followed by vermicomposting, implying short-duration low-investment enterprises complemented the core enterprizes, coconut and sericulture. On the contrary, under irrigated farming system, the maximum profitability was in silviculture, coconut and goat/sheep rearing, indicating long-duration enterprises acting as supplementary enterprizes offered better returns. The results revealed that the choice of enterprises, their combination and contri- bution to the improvement of system productivity differed for dryland and irrigated farming systems but IFS en- abled the systems more productive, profitable and sustainable under both the situations.

References

Ashby, J.A. 2001. Integrating research on food and the environment: An exit strategy from the rational fool syndrome in agricultural science. Conservation Ecology 5(2): 20.

Jagadeeshwara, Nagaraju, K.Y., Bhagyavathi and Nagaraju, K. 2011. Livelihood improvement of vulnerable farmers through integrated farming systems of Southern Karnataka. Journal of International Academic Research for Multidisciplinary 3(7): 319328.

Jayanthi, C., Balusamy, M., Chinnasamy C. and Mythili, S. 2003. Integrated nutrient supply system of linked components in lowland integrated farming system. Indian Journal of Agronomy 48(4): 241246.

Nhan, D.K., Phong, L.T., Verdegem, M.J.C., Duong, L.T., Bosma,

R.H. and Little, D.C. 2007. Integrated freshwater aquaculture, crop and livestock production in the Mekong delta, Vietnam: Determinants and the role of the pond. Agricultural Systems 94: 445458.

Radhamani, S. 2001. Sustainable integrated farming system for dry land Vertisol areas of Western Zone of Tamil Nadu. Ph.D. Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu.

Senthilvel, T., Latha, K.R. and Gopalasamy, N. 1998. Farming system approach for sustainable yield and income under rain fed vertisols. Madras Agriculture Journal 55(1): 6567.

Thilakar, P. G., Senthilkumar, Manivannan, C. and Ezhilvalavan, S.

KVK as integrated extension services (IES) for inte- Tripathi, S. C. and Rathi, R.C. 2011. Livestock farming system

grated farming system. (In) Proceedings of 22nd National module for hills. (In) Proceedings of National Symposium

Seminar on Role of Extension in Integrated Farming Sys- on Technological Interventions for Sustainable Agriculture

tems for Sustainable Rural Livelihood, 910 December, 35 May 2011, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agricul

, Maharashtra, pp. 41. ture and Technology, Hill Campus, Ranichuri, pp. 103.

Downloads

Published

2001-10-10

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

ARUN BALAMATTI, & SHAMARAJ. (2001). Participatory evaluation of choice and combination of enterprises for integrated farming system under dry-land and irrigated agro-ecosystems. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 62(1), 42217 . https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v62i1.4267