Influence of post-emergence herbicides on weeds and productivity of garden pea (Pisum sativum) under mid hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v58i2.4177Keywords:
Dose, Garden pea, Imazethapyr, Quizalofop, Time of applicationAbstract
To standardize dose and time of application of post-emergence herbicides in garden pea (Pisum sativum var. hortense) under mid-hills of Himalaya, eleven treatments viz., imazethapyr 100 and 150 g/ha at 20 and 40 DAS, quizalofop 25 and 37.5 g/ha at 20 DAS, isoproturon 1.0 and 1.25 kg/ha at 40 DAS, pendimethalin 1.5 kg/ha (pre- emergence), hand-weeding twice (30 and 60 DAS) and unweeded check were tested during the winter season of 2005-06 and 2006-07 at Palampur. The major weed flora was Phalaris minor, Avena fatua and Vicia sativa in both the years. Post-emergence application of all the herbicides except quizalofop 25 g/ha at 20 DAS and hand weed- ing twice resulted in significantly lower dry weight of weeds over pre-emergence pendimethalin 1.5 kg/ha. Higher doses of all the post-emergence herbicides were superior to their lower doses. Significantly lower dry matter accu- mulation of all the weed species and highest weed control efficiency were obtained with imazethapyr 150 g/ha (40 DAS). Imazethapyr 150 g/ha at 40 DAS resulted in maximum plant height, dry matter accumulation, crop growth rate, relative growth rate, nodule count and weight and green pod and haulm yields. Weeds in untreated check re- duced pea pod yield by 56.8% over the best post-emergence herbicidal treatment (imazethapyr 150 g/ha at 40 DAS) in 200506 and 60.1% in 200607.References
Bhyan, B.S., Batra, V.K., Singh, J. and Thakral, K.K. 2004. Effect
of weed competition on quality of pea seed. Haryana Jour
nal of Horticultural Sciences 33(12): 13031. Casarini, B., Poldini, L. and Silvestri, G. 1996. Experimental stud
ies on weed control in peas grown for processing. Industria
Conserve 3: 15. Doberzanski, A., Polczyski, J., Anyszka, Z., Vlinska, Z. and Smolinska, V. 1991. Influence of some of herbicides on weed control, legume and soil microflora. Pruszynski; S, Lipa J.J. (eds). Materialy 34 sesji Movkowej instytu Ochrong Roslin C.Z. 2. Postery-Poznan (Poland). Ponstwowe Vydawnictvo Rolmcze, Lense 11419.
Haar, M.J., Fennimore, S.A. and Lambert, C.L. 2001. Economics of pronamide and pendimethalin in use in weed management during stand establishment. Horticulture Science 36(4): 650
Khan, I., Hassan, G. and Marwat, K.B. 2002. Efficacies of different herbicides for controlling weeds in wheat crop, weed dynamics and herbicides. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research 8(12): 4147.
Nelson, D.C. and Giles, J.F. 1989. Weed management in two potato (Solanum tuberosum) cultivars using tillage and pendimethalin. Weed Science 37(2): 22832.
Singh, A.K. and Nepalia, V. 1994. Comparative efficiency of fluchloralin and pendimethalin for weed control in field pea. Indian Journal of Agronomy 39(2): 16465.
Singh, C.M., Angiras, N.N. and Kumar S. 1996. Weed Management.
M.D. Publications, New Delhi.
Skrzypczak, G., Pudelko, J., Blecharczyik, A. and Voznica, Z. 1994. Influence of pivot 100 SL (Imazethapyr) herbicide used in leguminous plants on rotational crops. Pruszynski S, Lipa JJ (Eds). Materialy 34 Sesji Movkowej Instytu Ochrong Roslin
C.Z. 2. Postery-Poznan (Poland). Ponstwowe Vydawnictvo Rolmcze, Lense 2025.
Stone, J.D. and Pedigo, L.P. 1972. Development and economic injury level of the green clover worm on soybean in Iowa. Journal of Economic Entomology 65: 19701.
Vaishya, R.D., Rai, O.P. and Singh, R.K. 1999. Weed control in pea with pre and post-emergence herbicides. Indian Journal of Pulses Research 12: 20105.
Walia, U.S. 2003. Weed Management. Kalyani Publishers, Ludhiana 396 p.




