Integrated nutrient management for sustaining the productivity of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) based intercropping systems under rainfed condition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v58i2.4171Keywords:
Intercropping, Integrated nutrient management, Pigeonpea, Rainfed, Seed inoculation, Water use efficiency.Abstract
A field experiment to study the effect of integrated nutrient management for sustaining the productivity of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] based intercropping systems was conducted for six consecutive years dur- ing 2005-06 to 2010-11 at Tirhut College of Agriculture, Dholi, Bihar. Pigeonpea+urdbean [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] intercropping system, recorded higher yield of pigeonpea (1.85 t/ha), pigeonpea equivalent yield (2.17 t/ ha), LER (2.29), production efficiency (8.56 Kg/ha/day), water use efficiency (2.96 Kg grain/ha/mm), fruiting effi- ciency (17.16%) net return ( 67.3103/ha) and net return per rupee investment (3.05) as compared to pigeonpea + maize (Zea mays L.) intercropping and sole pigeonpea. Pigeonpea + urdbean intercropping enhanced total ni- trogen uptake and reduced total potassium uptake by the system, than pigeonpea + maize intercropping. Integra- tion of FYM 5.0 tonnes or vermicompost 2.5 tonnes together with RDF proved effective and recorded significantly higher yields of pigeonpea, pigeonpea equivalent yield, LER, production efficiency, fruiting efficiency, water use efficiency, net returns and total NPK uptake by the system than RDF alone. However, higher net returns per rupee investment was recorded in combined application of FYM 5.0 t/ha and RDF (3.01). Seed inoculation with PSB ex- erted significant effect only on net return ( 64.4103/ha) than un inoculated seed ( 60.2103/ha). Lower value of aggressivity was recorded under combined application of FYM 5.0 tonnes/ha or vermicompost 2.5 tonnes/ha and RDF. Pigeonpea + Urdbean intercropping and combined application of FYM 5.0 tonnes/ha or vermicompost 2.5 tonne/ha and RDF improved bulk density and organic carbon and increased available N,P, K content of the soil over initial soil value.References
Ansari, M.A., Rana, K.S. and Kumar, P. 2011. Effect of nutrient management and antitranspirant on rainfed sole and inter-cropped pearlmillet (Pennisitum glaucum) and pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan). Indian Journal of Agronomy 56(3): 209
Faroda, A.S., Joshi, N.L., Singh, R. and Saxena, A. 2007. Resource management for sustainable crop production in arid zone.
Indian Journal of Agronomy 52(3): 18193.
Kumpawat, B.S. 2010. Integated nutrient management in blackgram (Vigna mungo) and its residual effect on succeeding mustard (Brassica juncea) crop. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 80(1): 7679.
Meena, S.L., Shamsudhar, M. and Dayal, D. 2009. Production of cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) and sesame (Sesamum indicum) intercropping system under different row ratio and nutrient management in arid region Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 79(11): 90105.
Marathe, R.A., Bharambe, P.R., Sharma, R. and Sharma, U.C. 2009. Soil properties of vertisol and yield of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) as influenced by integrated use of organic manures inorganic and bio-fertilizers. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 79(1): 37.
Palaniappan, S.P. and Annadurai, K. 2007. Organic farming: Theory and Practices pp 169 Scientific publication Jodhpur.
Palaniappan, S.P. and Sivaraman, K. 1996. Cropping systems in the tropics: Principles and management, pp. 2835, revised 2nd edn, New Age International Publishers, New Delhi 110 002.
Pandey, I.B., Bharti, V. and Mishra, S.S. 2003. Effect of maize (Zea mays)- based intercropping system on maize yield and associated weeds under rainfed condition. Indian Journal of Agronomy 48(1): 3033.
Tomar, S.S. and Tiwari, S.S. 1990. Production potential and economics of different crop sequences. Indian Journal of Agronomy 35(1 and 2): 3035.




