Impact of cropping systems and nutrient management practices on yield, economics and nutrient uptake of mustard + chickpea intercropping system
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v69i2.369Keywords:
Economics, Equivalent yield, Intercropping system, Nutrient uptake, Rainfed ecosystem, Row ratiosAbstract
A field experiment was planned and executed in split plot design at ICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute farm, New Delhi during the rabi seasons of 2021 and 2022 to determine the impact of cropping systems and nutrient management practices on yield, nutrient uptake and economics of mustard + chickpea intercropping system. Sixteen treatments were taken with cropping systems as main plots and nutrient management practices as sub-plots replicated thrice. Though crop yields for individual crops of mustard and chickpea were found to be the highest for sole crop, but yield of intercropping system in terms of mustard equivalent yield was found to be the highest for mustard + chickpea 5:2 row ratio (2.98 t/ha in 2021 and 3.06 t/ha in 2022). Yields of both mustard and chickpea were observed to be the highest in the plots treated with combination of organic manures and microbial consortia i.e., 20 kg nitrogen through farmyard manure + leaf manure @ 4t/ha + microbial consortia (1.38 t/ha for mustard and 1.60 t/ha for chickpea). Highest gross returns (Rs 84,560), net returns (Rs 54,040) and benefit-cost ratio (1.77) were found in mustard + chickpea 5:2 row ratio. Analysis of nutrient uptake revealed maximum nutrient uptake in mustard + chickpea 2:5 intercropping system which led to better vegetative growth and higher yields.
References
Gomez K A and Gomez A A. 1984. Statistical Producers for Agricultural Research, 2nd Edition. John Wiley and Sons Incorporation, New York.
Govindan, K., & Thirumurugan, V. (2005). Synergistic association of Rhizobium with phosphate-solubilizing bacteria under different sources of nutrient supply on productivity and soil fertility in soybean (Glycine max). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 50(3), 214-217.
Kumar, A., & Singh, B. P. (2006). Effect of row ratio and phosphorus level on performance of chickpea (Cicer arietinum)–Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) intercropping. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 51(2), 100-102.
Mucheru-Muna M, Pypers P, Mugendi D, Kung’u J, Mugwe J, Merckx R and Vanlauwe B. 2010. A staggered maize legume intercrop arrangement robustly increases crop yields and economic returns in the highlands of Central Kenya. Field Crops Research 115: 132–139.
Neupane, P. R., Ghimire, A. J., Tiwari, T. P., & Basnet, S. R. (1997). Effect of intercropping lentil (Lens esculenta) or mustard (Brassica campestris) on seed quality and grain production of wheat (Triticum aestivum). PAC Technical Paper Pakhribas Agricultural Centre.
Sarkar, D., Rakshit, A., Al-Turki, A. I., Sayyed, R. Z., & Datta, R. (2021). Connecting bio-priming approach with integrated nutrient management for improved nutrient use efficiency in crop species. Agriculture, 11(4), 372.
Singh, T., & Rana, K. S. (2006). Effect of moisture conservation and fertility on Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) and lentil (Lens culinaris) intercropping system under rainfed conditions. Indian journal of Agronomy, 51(4), 267-270.
Srinivasa Rao, C., Gopinath, K. A., Rama Rao, C. A., Raju, B. M. K., Rejani, R., Venkatesh, G., & Visha Kumari, V. (2016). Dryland agriculture in South Asia: experiences, challenges and opportunities. Innovations in dryland agriculture, 345-392.
Viswanathan, P. K., Kavya, K., & Bahinipati, C. S. (2020). Global patterns of climate-resilient agriculture: A review of studies and imperatives for empirical research in India. Review of Development and Change, 25(2), 169-192.
