Competition studies in intercropping of wheat (Triticum aestivm), rapeseed (Brassica campeshis) and pea (Pisum sativum)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v44i3.3545Keywords:
Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during winter (rabr) seasons of 1990-92 on intercropping of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.), rapeseed [Brassica campestris (L.) Czernj & Casson] and pea (Pisum sativum Poir.) at Jorhat. Results showed that wheat+rapeseed was the best combination for getting yield advantage in intercropping over wheat + pea and rapeseed+ pea as judged by wheat equivalent yield and various competitive functions like land-equivalent ratio and aggressivity. Among the proportions 1 : 1was found to be the most favourable. Yield advantage in wheat + pea and rapeseed+ pea combination was also observed except at 1 : 7 -- 3 sowing proportion. Either with wheat or rapeseed when the sowing proportion of pea was more than 50%, intercropping became disadvantageous.References
Dutta, H., Baroova, S.R., Rajkhowa, D.J. 1994. Feasibility and economic profitability of wheat (Triticum aestivum) based intercropping sys- tems under rainfed conditions. Indian Journal of Agronomy 39 (3) :448-450.
Mannan,A. 1987. Intercropping of wheat with rape-seed and mustard under rainfed condition, M.-Sc. (Agric.) thesis, Department of Agronomy:
Assam Agricultural university, orh hat.
Singh, J. and Yadav, D.S. 1990. Studies on the wheat based intercmpping system under rainfed conditions. Indian Journal of Agronomy 35
(2) :262-265.Dutta, H., Baroova, S.R., Rajkhowa, D.J. 1994. Feasibility and economic profitability of wheat (Triticum aestivum) based intercropping sys- tems under rainfed conditions. Indian Journal of Agronomy 39 (3) :448-450.
Mannan,A. 1987. Intercropping of wheat with rape-seed and mustard under rainfed condition, M.-Sc. (Agric.) thesis, Department of Agronomy:
Assam Agricultural university, orh hat.
Singh, J. and Yadav, D.S. 1990. Studies on the wheat based intercmpping system under rainfed conditions. Indian Journal of Agronomy 35
(2) :262-265.




