Effect of tillage practices, mulching and intercropping on rainfed maize (Zea mays) in foothill of Shivaliks, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir


  • TEJBIR SINGH BUTTAR Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir 180 009
  • VIKAS SHARMA Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir 180 009
  • RAJEEV BHARAT Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir 180 009




Intercropping, Mulch, Nutrients, Rainfed maize, Tillage


A field experiment was conducted during the rainy (kharif) season of 2017 and 2018 at Advanced Centre for Rainfed Agriculture, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Jammu, Dhianasr, Jammu and Kashmir to evaluate the effect of tillage, residue mulching and intercropping on nutrients, growth and yield of rainfed maize (Zea mays L.). The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with 3 replications. The treatments included conventional tillage (CT), CT+ mulching (CTm), CT + intercropping with mash [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] (CTi), minimum tillage (MT), MT + mulching (MTm), MT + intercropping with mash (MTi), MT + residue (MTr), zero tillage (ZT), ZT + mulching (ZTm) and ZT + residue (ZTr). The highest grain yield (3.01 t/ha) and yield attributes were recorded with minimum tillage + residue incorporation (MTr). However, the grain yield recorded in all the treatments were at par when equivalent yield of intercrop was taken. The intercropping of mash in maize sown by conventional tillage resulted in 34.3% reduction in grain yield of maize as compared to conventional tillage. The stover yield ranged from 5.65 to 7.93 t/ha and harvest index ranged from 23.8 to 32.5% in all the treatments was at par.


Conley, S. and John, G. 2013. Top 7 Recommendations for winter wheat establishment, agronomy, soybean research. University of Wisconsin, USA.

Gangwar, K.S. and Sharma, S.K. 1994. Fodder legume intercropping in maize and its effect on succeeding wheat. Indian Journal Agricultural Sciences 64(1): 38–40.

Ghosh, A., Subba, V., Roy, A., Ghosh, A. and Kundagrami, S. 2014. Genetic variability and character association of grain yield components in some inbred lines of maize (Zea mays L.) Journal of Agroecology and Natural Resource Management 1(2): 34–39.

Gidnavar, V.S., Shashidhara, G.B., Manjunathaiah, H.M. and Satyanarayana, T. 1991. Studies on intercropping of legumes in kharif maize and its residual effect on succeeding rabi wheat in black soils. Farming Systems 7(3–4): 90–96.

Kahlon, M.S., Lal, R. and Varughese, M.A. 2013. Twenty-two years of tillage and mulching impacts on soil physical characteristics and carbon sequestration in Central Ohio. Soil and Tillage Research 126: 151–158.

Keshavarzpour, F. and Rashidi, M. 2007. Effect of different tillage methods on soil physical properties and crop yield of watermelon (Citrullus vulgaris). Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science 2: 1–6.

Khan, M.A.H. 2001. Microclimatic manipulation and adaptation of quality protein maize (QPM) under dryland conditions. Final Report, BARC/ARMP funded Contract Research Project, Trombay, Mumbai, pp.72.

Liu, Z., Wang, G., Liu, H.Y., Lei, L. and Wu. Y. 2000. The effect of different mulching methods with whole maize straw in dryland on maize yield. Shanxi Agriculture Science 28: 20–22.

Moriaque, A.T., Félix, K.A., Anastase, A.H., Pascal, H., Moncef, B., Naivo, R. and Lionel, M. 2019. Effect of tillage and mulching on agronomic performances of maize and soil chemical properties in Linsinlin Watershed of Centre of Benin. African Journal of Agricultural Research 14(31): 1,421–1,431.

Mu, X.Y., Zhao, Y., Liu, K., Ji, B., Guo, H., Xue, Z. and Li, C. 2016. Response of soil properties, root growth and crop yield to tillage and crop residue management in wheat maize cropping system of North China Plain. European Journal of Agronomy 78: 32–43.

Owla, M.L., Nepalia, V., Chouhan, G.S. and Singh, D. 2015. Effect of fertility levels, nutrient sources and weed control on weed dynamics and yield of quality protein maize (Zea mays) and relative nitrogen and phosphorus uptake. Indian Journal of

Agronomy 60: 267–272.

Rafey, A. and Prasad, N.K. 1992. Biological potential and economic feasibility of maize + pigeonpea intercropping system in drylands. Indian Journal Agricultural Sciences 62(2): 110– 113.

Reddy, G.R., Malewar, G.U. and Karle, B.G. 2002. Effect of crop residue incorporation and tillage operations on soil properties of vertisol under rainfed agriculture. Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and Development 17: 55–58.

Sekhon, F.S., Singh T. and Singh, S. 2018a. Effect of intercropping systems and application of nutrients level to intercrops on

growth, phenology and yield of pigeon-pea (Cajanus cajan L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 88(3): 509– 514.

Sekhon, F.S., Singh, T. and Saini, K.S. 2018b. Productivity and nutrient uptake of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) in pigeonpeabased intercropping systems as influenced by planting patterns and nutrients levels applied to intercrops. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 88(10): 1,582–1,586.

Sekhon, F.S., Singh, T. and Saini, K.S. 2019. Production potential and economic returns of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)- based intercropping system as influenced by planting pattern and nutrients levels. Legume Research 42(4): 533–537.

Singh, A., Phogat, V.K., Dahiya, R. and Batra, S.D. 2014. Impact of long-term zero till wheat on soil physical properties and wheat productivity under rice–wheat cropping system. Soil and Tillage Research 140: 98–105.

Singh, J.P., Hussain, S.A. and Abrol, V. 2009. Impact of tillage and nutrient management in maize-wheat cropping system under dryland cultivation. Agricultural Mechanization Asia, Africa, Latin America 40(1): 60–64.






Research Paper

How to Cite

TEJBIR SINGH BUTTAR, VIKAS SHARMA, & RAJEEV BHARAT. (2023). Effect of tillage practices, mulching and intercropping on rainfed maize (Zea mays) in foothill of Shivaliks, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 68(2), 171-175. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v68i2.350