Yield and economics as influenced by wiier maize (Zea mays)- based intercropping systems in North Bihar

Authors

  • K.K. SINHA
  • S.S. MISHRA
  • S.J. SlNGH

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v44i1.3458

Keywords:

Intercropping. Maize. Potato. French bean. Planting pattern, Fertility. Weed management

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during 1991-92 and 1992-93 to evaluate the yield and economics of-winter maize (Zea mays L.)-based intercropping systems under different fertility and weed-management systems at Pusa (Bihar). Maize grown with potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in normal (1 : I ) and paired row planting (2 :2) reduced the weed population, their dry weight and increased the weed-smothering efficiency of crop canopy (66.10 and 60.59% respectively). Maize intercropped with potato was more advantageous than French bean.(Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and sig- nificantly improved all the yield attributes as well as yield of component crops and finally recorded significantly higher maize-equivalent yield (12.30 and 12.02 tonnesl ha) than normal (1 : 2) and paired planting (2 :4) of maize with French bean (9.81 and 9.65 tonneslha). On an average, maize htercropped with potato under normal ,-_ and paired planting systems, recorded 20.69 and 18.89% higher maize-equivalent yield than normal and paired row maize with French bean. Although gross return was more with maize + potato, the net return and net return per rupee investment were higher in maize + French bean. The higher level of fertilizer resulted in significant increase in all the yield attributes and yield of component crops and ultimately the maize-equivalent yield. Net return was significantly higher with 100% fertilizer dose but the net return per rupee of investment was higher with 75% dose. Weedy eco- system registered a yield reduction of 29.63,26.79 and 38.85% in maize, potato and French bean respectively. Significantly higher maize-equivalent yield was recorded under hand-weeding and pendimethalin-treated plots than weedy check. Chemical weeding recorded signicantly higher net return per rupee of investment.

References

Balyan, R.S. and Bhan, V.M. 1987. Studieson cultural and chem~cal weed control in maize fndian Journal of Agronomy 32 (1) :41-43.

Pandey,J. and Shukla, K. 1985. Chemical weed control for intercropped maize with potato. Pesficides 19(6) :

Prusty, J.C., Mahendrapal and Dayanand. 1987. Influence ofnitrogen on yield and yield attributesofmaize un- der different methods ofweed control and cropping systems. Indian Journal ofAgronomy 32 (4) :370-

Shah, M.H., Bali, A.S., Khanday, B.A. and Singh, K.N. 1992. Economics of fertilizer management in maize (Zea mays)and its effects on yield under limited mois- ture resources. lndian Journal ofAgronomy 37 (2) : 243-245.

Singh,G. and Singh, O.P. 1993. Intercropping compatibil- ity ofdifferent crops with winter maize (Zen mays). Indian Journal ofAgronomy 38 (4) :5 19-522.

Sinha, R., Lal, S.S.,Govind Krishnan, P.M., Jaiswal, V.P. and Akhade, M.N. 1994. Evaluation and development of potato-based cropping systems in different agro- climatic region (in.) Annual Scienrijic Repon, 1992-

Cenbal Potato Research Institute, Shimla, pp. 32-

Downloads

Published

2001-10-10

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

K.K. SINHA, S.S. MISHRA, & S.J. SlNGH. (2001). Yield and economics as influenced by wiier maize (Zea mays)- based intercropping systems in North Bihar. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 44(1), 44_1 . https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v44i1.3458