Effect of summer ploughing and in-situ moisture- conservation practices on growth and yield of rainfed pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v45i4.3435Keywords:
In situ moisture-conservation practices, Rainfed pearlmillet, Growth and yield, Soil-moisture depletionAbstract
A field experiment was conducted during the rainy season (kharit) of 1997 and 1998 with hybrid Pusa 322 pearlmillet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br. emend. Stuntz]. The treatments comprised 3 summer ploughing (no summer ploughing, summer ploughing, summer ploughing t FYM t herbicidet insecticide) and 6 in- . situ moisture-conservation methods (uniform row sowing, paired row sowing, ridge and furrow sowing, organic mulch, kaolin spray and mulch t kaolin). Significant increase in growth and yield of pearlmillet was observed owing to , summer ploughing and the maximum grain yield was recorded under summer ploughing + FYM + herbicide t lnsectlclde (22.70 and 25.09 q/ha in 1997 and 1998 respectlvely), Straw mulch + kaolln spray was found on a par with straw mulch alone and kaolln spray alone for graln yleld durlng both the years. The Increase In graln yleld of pearlmillet owlng to straw mulch+ kaolln epray was 9.93 and 10,33 qlha over unlform row eowlng and 7.34 and 6,02 qlha over rldge and furrow eowlng In 1997 and 1998 respectlvely. Growth and yleld-attrlbutlng characters showed elmllar trend, The eoll-moleture depletion pattern was Influenced by summer ploughing and moleture-coneewatlon treatments only .during 1998, lrrespectlve of the treatment applled, maxlmum sol1 molsture was depleted from top 0-30 cm sol1 layer and the lowest belng from 60-90 cm sol1 layer.References
Ali, M. and Prasad, R. 1974. Effect of mulches, reflectants and type of seedbed on yield of bar- ley grown under semi-arid conditions. Annals ofArid Zone 13 (4):330-338.
Bhatnagar, S.K., Yadav, O.P. and Gautam, R.C. 1998. Research achievements in pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum). Indian Journal of Ag-
Browing, G.M., Norton, R.A., Collins, E.V.and Willson, H.A. 1994. Tillage practices in rela- tion to soil and water conservation and crop yield in lowa. proceedings of Soil Science So- ciety of America 9 :241-247.
Kaushik, S.K. and Gautam, ~.~.'1994.Response of rainfed pearlmillet (Penniseam glaucum) to water harvesting, rnoisture,~onservation and plant population in light soils. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 64 (12): 858-860.
Kaushik, S.K. and Lal, K. 1997.Relative efficiency of mulches and anti-transpirants on productiv- ity and water use efficiency of rainfed pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum L.). Indian Journal of Agronomy 42 (1) : 104-106.
Mclntyre, B.D., Riha, S:J. and Flower, D.J. 1995. Water uptake by pearlmillet in a semi-arid en- vironment. Field Crops Research 43 : 67-76.
Pandey, S.K., Kaushik, S.K. and Gautam, R.C. 1988. Response of rainfed pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) to plant density and moisture conservation. Indian Journal of Agri- cultural Sciences 58 :517-520.
Singh, S., Kaushik S.K. and Gautam, R.C. 1997. Effect of tillage and moisture conservation practices on productivity, water use and water use efficiency of pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum) on light soils under dryland condi- tion. Indian Journal ofAgricultura1 Sciences 67 (6):232-236.




