Contribution and impact of production factors on growth, yield attributes, yield and economics of rainfed wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Authors

  • A.K. PANDEY
  • VED PRAKASH
  • R.D. SINGH
  • H.S. GUPTA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v46i4.3329

Keywords:

Wheat, Production factor, Yield, Economics, Rainfed

Abstract

Received : January 2001 A field experiment was conducted during the winter (rabr) season of 1996 97 to 1998 99 to find out the contribution of different production factors on grain yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori Paol.) and preferential order of input supply under resource constraint conditions. Complete package of practices resulted in significantly higher mean grain yield (3, 021 kglha) and net returns (Rs 7,797lha) compared with the grain yield (1,497 kglha) and net returns (Rs 1,670lha) obtained under farmer s practice. Inclusion of recommended fertilizers, weed management and variety separately in farmers practice resulted in significantly higher mean grain yield (41.9, 36.3 and 24.2%) and.net returns (Rs 5,522, 2,835 and 2,732lha respectively) than farmers s practice. However, inclusion of line sowing in farmers practice showed net loss of Rs 339 /ha compared to farmers practice. Grain yield decreased significantly when either of the production factors was withdrawn from complete package of practices and the maximum reduction in mean grain yield was recorded due to fertilizers (42.2%), followed by weed management (34.9%), variety (30.8%), timely sowing (1 7.4%), line sowing (9.1 %) and plant protection measures (8.2%). Net returns also reduced significantly when either improved variety or recommended fertilizers or weed management or timely sowing was withdrawn from complete package of practices. However, exclusion of line sowing or plant protection measures frdm complete package of plactices did not bring significant reduction in net returns compared to complete package of practices.

References

Ghosh, D.C. and Mukhopadhyay, S.K. 1.984.

Response of wheat varieties to low rates of

nitrogen application. Indian Journal of

Agronomy 29 (2) : 142-145. Paliwal, P.L., Gupta, I.N., Kothari, Anil and

Rathore, S.S. 1995. Effect of cultural practices on wheat (Triticum aestivum) under receding soil moisture condition. Indian Journal of Agronomy 40 (4) : 700-702.

Pandey, A.K. and Chauhan, V.S. 1999. Wheat front-line demonstration-an effective ap- proach for technology transfer to farmers in hills of Uttar Pradesh. Indian Farming 49(8) : 19-20,23-25.

Singh, Gurmel, Koranne, K.D.'and Bhusan, L.S. 1981. Advances in ginfed farming. Bulletin, Central Soil and Water Conservation and Training Institute, ~ehra Dun, pp. 1-106.

Singh, T., Singh, K.N., Bali, Amarjeet, S. and Bhatt, G.N. 1995:Response of wheat (Triti- cum aestivum) genotypes to nitrogen and phosphorus. Indian Journal of Agronomy 40

(1) : 99-101.

Downloads

Published

2001-10-10

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

A.K. PANDEY, VED PRAKASH, R.D. SINGH, & H.S. GUPTA. (2001). Contribution and impact of production factors on growth, yield attributes, yield and economics of rainfed wheat (Triticum aestivum). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 46(4), 46_4 . https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v46i4.3329