Yield, quality and economics as influenced by winter maize (Zea mays) based intercropping system in eastern Uttar Pradesh

Authors

  • B.N. MISRA
  • BHAGWAN SINGH
  • A.L. RAJPUT

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v46i3.3285

Keywords:

Winter maize based cropping system, Yield, Quality, Economics

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during winter (rabq season of 1994 95 and 1995 96 to evaluate the yield, quality and economics of winter maize (Zea mays L.) based intercropping system under different planting pattern system and fertility level at Kumarganj (Faizabad). Maize grown with lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus) was more advantageous than rajma (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and I ndian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. Cosson] and gave significantly highest average maize yield (74.0 qlha), intercrop yield (1 1.4 qlha), maize equivalent yield (104.3 qlha), uptake of W, P and K (168.9, 23.7 and 158.7 kglha), protein content (lo%), carbohydrate content (68.7%), gross returns (Rs. 49,672/ha), net returns (Rs 32,5711ha) and benefit : cost ratio (1.91) over other intercropping system owing to minimum competition between crops. The paired planting pattern gave significantly higher yield (91.34 qlha), uptake of nutrients, contents of protein and carbohydrate and monetary returns as well as income equivalent ratio (1.48) over alternate planting pattern. Application up to 100 h recommended dose of fertilizer to intercrop increased significantly maize, lentil and maize equivalent yields of 69.5, 11.1 and 93.5 qlha, uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium of 159.1, 25.4 and 145.8 kglha and content of protein and carbohydrate 10.1 and 70.1%. However, gross returns, net returns and benefit : cost ratio of Rs 47,865/ha, Rs 30,7641ha and 1.80 were significantly increased with increasing up to 50% recommended dose of fertilizer to intercrop. Growth and yjeld components such as plant height, dry matter accumulation, leaf area index, rowslcob, test weight and shelling (%) showed trends similar to yields. The intercropping system when maize was grown with lentil row with 50% recommended dose of fertilizer to intercrop was found to be more profitable.

References

AICRMIP. 1979. Annual Report Rabi (I 978-79). All India Co-ordinated Maize Improvement Project, Dholi, Bihar.

Bhatt, B.S. and Damor, G.M.1985. Relative per- formance of inter crops at graded levles of fer- tilizer in maize. Indian Journal of Agronomy 30 (4) : 514-515. -

Hegde, D.M. and Saraf, C.S. 1962. Effect of inter- cropping, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilization on concentration, uptake and po- tassium fertilization concentration, uptake and productivity of pigeopea, Journal of Agro- nomy and Crop Science 151 (4) : 302-3 14.

Mishra, B.N., Yadav, R.S., Rajput, A.L. and Singh, S.P. 1994. Performance of maize and pegeonpea intercropping under different row spacings in eastern Uttar Pradesh. Indian Jour- nal of Agronomy 39(3) : 45 1452,

Prasad, U.K. and Prasad, T.N. 1988. Production potential of intercrops with winter maize. In-dian Farming 37(10) : 9-10.

Singh, G. and Singh, O.P. 1993. Intercropping compatibility of differed crops with winter maize. Indian Journal of Agronomy 38(4) : 5 19-522.

Sinha, K.K., Mishra, S.S. and Singh, S.J. 1999. Yield and economics as influenced by winter maize-based intercropping system in North Bihar. Indian Journal of Agronomy 44(1) : 30-35.

Downloads

Published

2001-10-10

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

B.N. MISRA, BHAGWAN SINGH, & A.L. RAJPUT. (2001). Yield, quality and economics as influenced by winter maize (Zea mays) based intercropping system in eastern Uttar Pradesh. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 46(3), 46_3 . https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v46i3.3285