Effect of planting technique and fertigation on growth, yield and quality of banana (Musa sp)

Authors

  • B.S. RASKAR

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v48i3.3087

Keywords:

Banana, Planting technique, Fertigation, Yield

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during 1997 98 and 1999 2000 to assess the effect of planting technique and fertigation through drip on the growth, yield and quality of banana (Musa sp.). Twelve treatments comprising 2 fer tilizer sources [water soluble and straight (N through drip)], 3 fertilizer levels [50, 75 and 100% of recommended fertilizer (444:178:888 kg N : P,O, : K,O/ha)] and 2 planting systems [ normal planting (1.5 m x 1.5 m) and triangu lar paired planting (0.90 2.1 0 m x 1.5 m) along with surface method of irrigation using straight fertilizer as usual were tried in factorial randomized block design with 3 replications. Banana yield was significantly higher under nor mal planting than paired planting, resulting 11.38 % higher fruit yield. The yield of banana was increased signifi cantly where water soluble fertilizer used in fertigation compared to straight fertilizer. The yield, pulp : peel ratio and total soluble solids (TSS) were increased significantly by application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizer. Application of 50% recommended fertilizer dose thought drip, resulted in 50% of fertilizer saving than surface irri gation. Water use efficiency under drip at 100% fertilizer level was more than double compared to surface method of irrigation (2.18 kglha cm). The returns and benefit : cost ration were significantly higher in normal planting in straight fertilizer with N through drip and application of 100% recommended dose of fertilizer than those observed under the treatments of paired planting straight fertilizer and lower fertilizer levels.

References

(Table 2). The acidity decreased significantly with in- Berad, S.M. 1996. 'Use of liquid fertilizer through drip irrigation of creased fertilizer dose and it was maximum under 50% Banana (Cv. Basari).' M. Sc. (Agriculture), Thesis, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapath, Rahuri, Maharashtra.

Daniel, J. W., Fawell, P. J. and Champbell, S. J. 1985. The response of banana to plant spacing in double rows in North

Economic analysis

Quensland. Queensland Journal of Agricultural and Animal

The net returns due to planting system were significant

Sciences 42 (1) :45-5 1. and were maximum in normal planting (Rs 110,281) Hegde, D.M. and Shrinivas, K. 1990. Growth, productivity and wa- compared with paired planting system (Rs 94,139). The ter use of banana under drip and basin irrigation in relation net returns were significantly higher under straight to evaporation replenishment. Indian Journal of Agronomy

(1,2) :100-102.

fertilizer with N through drip (Rs 118,370ha) than WSF

Kumar, A. and Singh, A.K. 2002. Improving nutrient and water use

(Rs 86,050ha). Though the fruit yield was increased about

efficiency through fertigation. Journal of Water Management

46 tomesfha due to water-soluble fertilizer, its additional

(1,2) :42-48. cost indicating economic infeasibility when compared Parikh, M. M., Shrivastava, P.K., Savani, N. G., Holar, G. H. and with N through drip alone in medium deep soil. The Raman, S. 1993. Response of Banana to N application

application of recommended dose of fertilizer through drip

Downloads

Published

2001-10-10

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

B.S. RASKAR. (2001). Effect of planting technique and fertigation on growth, yield and quality of banana (Musa sp). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 48(3), 48_3 . https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v48i3.3087